This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011CN0548
Case C-548/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidshof te Antwerpen (Belgium), lodged on 31 October 2011 — Edgard Mulders v Rijksdienst voor Pensioenen
Case C-548/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidshof te Antwerpen (Belgium), lodged on 31 October 2011 — Edgard Mulders v Rijksdienst voor Pensioenen
Case C-548/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidshof te Antwerpen (Belgium), lodged on 31 October 2011 — Edgard Mulders v Rijksdienst voor Pensioenen
OJ C 25, 28.1.2012, p. 32–32
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
28.1.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 25/32 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidshof te Antwerpen (Belgium), lodged on 31 October 2011 — Edgard Mulders v Rijksdienst voor Pensioenen
(Case C-548/11)
(2012/C 25/59)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Arbeidshof te Antwerpen
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Edgard Mulders
Respondent: Rijksdienst voor Pensioenen
Question referred
Is Article 46 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 (1) of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community infringed in the case where, in the calculation of the pension of a migrant worker, a period of incapacity for work during which a work incapacity benefit was awarded and contributions under the Netherlands General Law on Old-Age Pensions were paid is not regarded as being a ‘period of insurance’ within the meaning of Article 1(r) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71?
(1) OJ, English Special Edition 1971(II), p. 416.