This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011CN0028
Case C-28/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 18 January 2011 — Eurogate Distribution GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt
Case C-28/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 18 January 2011 — Eurogate Distribution GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt
Case C-28/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 18 January 2011 — Eurogate Distribution GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt
OJ C 130, 30.4.2011, p. 8–9
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
30.4.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 130/8 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 18 January 2011 — Eurogate Distribution GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt
(Case C-28/11)
2011/C 130/15
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Finanzgericht Hamburg
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Eurogate Distribution GmbH
Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt
Question referred
On a proper interpretation of Article 204(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (1) (‘the Customs Code’) does infringement of the obligation, in the case of non-Community goods which were in the customs warehousing procedure and acquired a new customs destination at the termination of that procedure, to record the removal of the goods from the customs warehouse in the apposite computer programme forthwith upon termination of the customs warehousing procedure — rather than considerably later — cause a customs debt to arise in respect of the goods?