Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62009TJ0299

    Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 February 2011.
    Gühring OHG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
    Community trade mark - Application for a Community trade mark consisting of a combination of the colours broom yellow and silver grey - Application for a Community trade mark consisting of a combination of the colours yellow ochre and silver grey - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Examination of the facts of the Court's own motion - Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.
    Cases T-299/09 and T-300/09.

    European Court Reports 2011 II-00017*

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2011:28





    Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 February 2011 – Gühring v OHIM (Combination of the colours broom yellow and silver grey and combination of the colours yellow ochre and silver grey)

    (Cases T-299/09 and T-300/09)

    Community trade mark – Application for a Community trade mark consisting of a combination of the colours broom yellow and silver grey – Application for a Community trade mark consisting of a combination of the colours yellow ochre and silver grey – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Examination of the facts of the Court’s own motion – Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 – Duty to state reasons – Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009

    1.                     Community trade mark – Procedural provisions – Statement of reasons for decisions – Article 75, first sentence, of Regulation No 207/2009 – Scope identical to that of Article 253 EC (Art. 253 EC; Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 75, first sentence) (see para. 16)

    2.                     Community trade mark – Procedural provisions – Statement of reasons for decisions (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 75) (see paras 17-19)

    3.                     Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks devoid of any distinctive character (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(b)) (see paras 63, 65, 73)

    Re:

    Two actions brought against the decisions of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 April 2009 (Cases R 1330/2008-1 and R 1329/2008-1) concerning applications for registration of the combination of the colours broom yellow and silver grey and the combination of the colours yellow ochre and silver grey as Community trade marks.

    Information relating to the case

    Applicant for the Community trade marks:

    Gühring OHG

    Community trade marks concerned:

    Mark made up of a combination of the colours of broom yellow and silver grey for goods in Class 7 – Application No 6703581

    Mark made up of a combination of the colours of yellow ochre and silver grey for goods in Class 7 – Application No 6703565

    Decision of the Opposition Division:

    Registrations refused

    Decision of the Board of Appeal:

    Appeals dismissed


    Operative part

    The Court:

    1.

    Orders that Cases T-299/09 and T-300/09 be joined for the purposes of the judgment;

    2.

    Dismisses the actions;

    3.

    Orders Gühring OHG to pay the costs.

    Top