This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62008CN0165
Case C-165/08: Action brought on 17 April 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Poland
Case C-165/08: Action brought on 17 April 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Poland
Case C-165/08: Action brought on 17 April 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Poland
OJ C 183, 19.7.2008, p. 11–11
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
19.7.2008 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 183/11 |
Action brought on 17 April 2008 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Poland
(Case C-165/08)
(2008/C 183/20)
Language of the case: Polish
Parties
Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: B. Doherty and A. Szmytkowska, Agents)
Defendant: Republic of Poland
Form of order sought
|
— |
declare that, by introducing a ban on the free movement of seed derived from genetically modified varieties and by prohibiting the registration of genetically modified varieties in the national catalogue of varieties, the Republic of Poland has failed to comply with its obligations under Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) in its entirety, and in particular pursuant to Articles 22 and 23 thereof, as well as its obligations under Council Directive 2002/53/EC (2), and in particular Articles 4(4) and 16 thereof; |
|
— |
order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The national provision stating that ‘seed derived from genetically modified varieties may not be authorised for marketing within the territory of the Republic of Poland’ is at variance with Directive 2001/18/EC, which lays down the principles governing the bringing onto the market of genetically modified organisms. Article 22 of that directive prohibits the Member States from imposing additional conditions on the marketing of organisms which have been authorised at Community level, while Article 23 of the directive provides for restrictions and prohibitions only in the case of particular genetically modified organisms and only in special circumstances. In none of its provisions does the directive authorise a Member State to prohibit, in a general and unjustified manner, the marketing, within its territory, of an entire category (in this case, seed) of genetically modified organisms. The aforementioned provision is also at variance with Directive 2002/53/EC, in particular Article 16 thereof, inasmuch as it constitutes a marketing restriction in relation to seed derived from varieties listed in the common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species.
The national provision stating that ‘genetically modified varieties may not be registered in the national catalogue’ is at variance with Directive 2002/53/EC. Article 4(4) of that directive does not authorise Member States to prohibit generally the registration of genetically modified varieties in the national catalogue, but rather imposes on them solely the obligation to ensure, when such varieties are being entered in the national catalogue, that each of those varieties had been approved in accordance with the Community legislation applicable to genetically modified organisms.
(1) OJ L 106, 17.4.2001, p. 1-39.
(2) OJ L 193, 20.7.2002, p. 1-11.