(1)

Article 10 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 (2) sets out rules for the granting of advances for direct payments where financial discipline referred to in Article 8 of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (3) applies in respect of the relevant claim year. In order to ensure the uniform application of those rules in all Member States, it is appropriate to clarify that financial discipline should not be taken into account for the calculation of advances for direct payments, given that the final adjustment rate to be set by 1 December may not yet be known at the moment of paying advances.

(2)

In order to enhance the correctness of the aid application or payment claim, it should be explicitly stated that Member States are able to introduce, on a voluntary basis, a system of ‘preliminary checks’ that will inform beneficiaries about potential non-compliances and will allow them to change their aid applications and payments claim in time in order to avoid reductions and administrative penalties. Full administrative checks will still have to be carried out before payment is made. In order to avoid a different treatment between farmers of the same Member State, such system should be applied at the Member State level, not at holding level. Since that system is based on the existence of the geo-spatial aid application, it can only be applied once such a system is fully in place in the Member State concerned. As the responsibility of submitting a correct aid application or payment claim remains with the beneficiary, any results of ‘preliminary checks’ should be without prejudice to the subsequent results of the administrative cross-checks. Such system can be applied at regional level provided that the pre-established form and corresponding graphic material referred to in Article 72(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 provided through a GIS-based interface, enabling the processing of the spatial and alphanumerical data of the areas declared, are set up at regional level.

(3)

The possibility that a group of farmers applying for support under some of the rural development measures is treated as the beneficiary (hereinafter referred to as ‘collective’) is relevant especially for agro-environment-climate measures as referred to in Article 28 of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (4) implemented at the level of habitat, such as biodiversity and nature conservation measures. A legal framework should therefore be provided for the management and control of such collectives. In order to give further flexibility to those beneficiaries to facilitate a result-oriented approach, Member States should also be given the possibility to combine this system with a system of real-time notification of commitments, where the beneficiaries would notify commitments planned no later than 14 days before they are actually carried out. Tailor-made checks should complete the mechanism.

(4)

As regards the fulfilment of the greening obligations, beneficiaries need to declare the use of agricultural parcels at the latest by the final date for submission of the single application or aid application as referred to in Article 13 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014. However, during growing season the beneficiary might need to adapt the cultivation plan as regards the crop or its location. Therefore, beneficiaries should be given the possibility to modify, in duly justified circumstances, and for the purpose of the greening only, their declaration with respect to the agricultural parcels declared. This possibility should be applicable provided that it does not have an effect on the status of compliance with the greening obligations with respect to the initial declaration.

(5)

The on-the-spot control sample of beneficiaries who are exempted from the greening requirements is currently not selected according to the sampling methodology via the cascade mechanism as set out in Article 34 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014. As a consequence, it is not counted against the sample of beneficiaries applying for the basic payment scheme or the single area payment scheme, contrary to the sample of beneficiaries who are subject to the greening requirements. In order to increase the efficiency of the sample selection and to lower the number of beneficiaries to be checked on-the-spot, this sample should be selected according to the same sampling methodology.

(6)

The on-the-spot control sample for animal-aid schemes is currently not selected according to the sampling methodology via the cascade mechanism as set out in Article 34 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014. In order to further increase the efficiency of the sample selection and to minimise the number of beneficiaries to be checked on-the-spot, it should be provided that this sample can be selected according to the same sampling methodology.

(7)

In order to reduce the administrative burden and to increase the efficiency of the selection of samples for on-the-spot checks, it is appropriate to provide for the explicit possibility for Member States to combine the sample selection for on-the-spot checks under the direct payment schemes and some rural development support measures covered by the integrated administration and control system (‘integrated system’). As the direct payments and rural development populations do not fully match one to one, Member States need to ensure the representativeness of the resulting samples.

(8)

The current rules on the selection of the control sample for the purpose of on-the-spot checks within the integrated system do not include a provision on the type of sampling selection which should apply to the additional beneficiaries to be selected where the ecological focus areas are not identified in the identification system for agricultural parcels. It is appropriate to provide for that this additional sample is to be selected on the basis of a risk analysis.

(9)

When applying the current provisions on the reduction of the control rate for the purpose of on-the-spot checks within the integrated system in respect of claim years 2015 and 2016, only those Member States which have implemented a voluntary system for the certification of the error rate by their certification body in the last years can actually benefit from a possible reduction of the control rate. For all other Member States, the first opportunity to reduce the control rate starts only as from claim year 2017. For that reason, it is appropriate to open the possibility to reduce the control rates for certain direct payments to other Member States that in respect of claim year 2016 certify their error rates in accordance with the new methodology drawn up at Union level taking account of Article 7(4) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 908/2014 (5) from financial year 2015.

(10)

Article 42 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 sets out rules as regards the on-the-spot checks of livestock aid applications and payment claims under animal-related support measures that are to be carried out during the retention period for animals. Those rules aim at ensuring that the respect of the retention period obligation can be checked adequately. However, it is appropriate to give Member States the possibility to decide that on-the-spot checks are to be spread where the retention period starts before an aid application or payment claim is submitted or where it cannot be fixed in advance.

(11)

Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 should therefore be amended accordingly.

(12)

The amendments made by this Regulation should apply to aid applications, applications for support or payment claims relating to claim years or premium periods starting as from 1 January 2016. However, taking into account the fact that beneficiaries might need to adapt the cultivation plan as regards the crop or its location in claim year 2015, the provision allowing Member States to authorise the beneficiary to modify the content of the single application as regards the use of the agricultural parcels should apply from 1 January 2015. In addition, taking into account the difficulties encountered in claim year 2015 by the Member States having set up such a retention period, the provision allowing to spread on-the-spot checks where the retention period starts before an aid application or payment claim is submitted or where it cannot be fixed in advance should also apply from 1 January 2015.

(13)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for Direct Payments and the Rural Development Committee,

(1)

Article 10 is replaced by the following:

(2)

In Article 11, the following paragraphs 4 and 5 are added:

(3)

In Article 14, the following paragraph 4 is added:

(4)

The following Article 14a is inserted:

(5)

Article 15 is amended as follows:

(6)

In Article 17, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:

(7)

In Article 25, the second subparagraph is replaced by the following:

‘However, for on-the-spot checks concerning livestock aid applications or payment claims under animal-related support measures or commitments notified in accordance with Article 14a(5), the announcement shall not exceed 48 hours, except in duly justified cases. Furthermore, where the legislation applicable to the acts and standards relevant to cross-compliance requires the on-the-spot check to be unannounced, those rules shall also apply in the case of on-the-spot checks related to cross-compliance.’

(8)

In Article 26(2), the following second subparagraph is added:

‘The on-the-spot checks on commitments notified in accordance with Article 14a(5) shall be carried out within the time limits that ensure an effective verification of the commitment notified.’

(9)

In Article 31, the first subparagraph of paragraph 3 is replaced by the following:

(10)

Article 32 is amended as follows:

(11)

Article 34 is amended as follows:

(12)

Article 36 is amended as follows:

(13)

In Article 37, the following paragraph 4 is added:

(14)

In Article 41(2), the following subparagraph is inserted after the first subparagraph:

‘By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, where the Member State uses the option to introduce collective claims, the Member State may decide not to give the collective the opportunity to sign the control report if no non-compliance is revealed during the check. If any non-compliance is revealed as a consequence of such checks, the opportunity to sign the report shall be given before the competent authority draws its conclusions from the findings with regard to any resulting reductions, refusals, withdrawals or penalties.’

(15)

In the second subparagraph of Article 42(1), the following sentence is added:

‘However, where the retention period starts before an aid application or payment claim has been submitted or where it cannot be fixed in advance, Member States may decide that the on-the-spot checks provided for in Article 32 or 33 shall be spread over the period in which an animal may qualify for the payment or support.’