This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TB0617
Case T-617/18: Order of the General Court of 16 September 2019 — ZH v ECHA (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — 2016 staff report — Sick leave — Claim for compensation — Complaint brought after expiry of the three-month period prescribed by Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations — Force majeure — Excusable error — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case T-617/18: Order of the General Court of 16 September 2019 — ZH v ECHA (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — 2016 staff report — Sick leave — Claim for compensation — Complaint brought after expiry of the three-month period prescribed by Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations — Force majeure — Excusable error — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case T-617/18: Order of the General Court of 16 September 2019 — ZH v ECHA (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — 2016 staff report — Sick leave — Claim for compensation — Complaint brought after expiry of the three-month period prescribed by Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations — Force majeure — Excusable error — Manifest inadmissibility)
OJ C 399, 25.11.2019, p. 60–61
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
25.11.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 399/60 |
Order of the General Court of 16 September 2019 — ZH v ECHA
(Case T-617/18) (1)
(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - 2016 staff report - Sick leave - Claim for compensation - Complaint brought after expiry of the three-month period prescribed by Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations - Force majeure - Excusable error - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2019/C 399/74)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: ZH (represented by: L. Levi and N. Flandin, lawyers)
Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (represented by: M. Heikkilä, T. Zbihlej and C.-M. Bergerat, acting as Agents, and by A. Duron, lawyer)
Re:
Application pursuant to Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the applicant’s 2016 staff report and, second, compensation for the non-material damage which she claims to have suffered.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed. |
|
2. |
ZH shall pay the costs. |