Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62019CN0687

    Case C-687/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Mons (Belgium) lodged on 18 September 2019 — Ryanair Ltd v PJ

    OJ C 399, 25.11.2019, p. 33–33 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    25.11.2019   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 399/33


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Mons (Belgium) lodged on 18 September 2019 — Ryanair Ltd v PJ

    (Case C-687/19)

    (2019/C 399/38)

    Language of the case: French

    Referring court

    Cour d’appel de Mons

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Ryanair Ltd

    Defendant: PJ

    Question referred

    Must Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 889/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 May 2002 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 on air carrier liability in the event of accidents, (1) and therefore Article 17(1) of the Montreal Convention of 28 May 1999 for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air, be interpreted as precluding the payment of compensation for a psychological injury, such as post-traumatic stress, on the basis of those provisions?


    (1)  OJ 2002 L 140, p. 2.


    Top