Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62018TN0631

    Case T-631/18: Action brought on 17 October 2018 — Herholz Vertrieb v EUIPO (
    )

    OJ C 445, 10.12.2018, p. 24–24 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    10.12.2018   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 445/24


    Action brought on 17 October 2018 — Herholz Vertrieb v EUIPO (#)

    (Case T-631/18)

    (2018/C 445/30)

    Language in which the application was lodged: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Herholz Vertrieb GmbH & Co. KG (Ahaus, Germany) (represented by: D. Sprenger, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Trade mark at issue: EU word mark # — Application for registration No 16 967 267

    Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 August 2018 in Case R 445/2018-2

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    vary the contested decision by registering the EU trade mark as applied for;

    order EUIPO to pay the costs.

    Plea in law

    Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.


    Top