This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TA0367
Case T-367/17: Judgment of the General Court of 18 October 2018 — Linak v EUIPO -ChangZhou Kaidi Electrical (Electrically operated lifting column) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing an electrically operated lifting column — Earlier Community design — Ground for invalidity — No individual character — Informed user — No different overall impression — Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)
Case T-367/17: Judgment of the General Court of 18 October 2018 — Linak v EUIPO -ChangZhou Kaidi Electrical (Electrically operated lifting column) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing an electrically operated lifting column — Earlier Community design — Ground for invalidity — No individual character — Informed user — No different overall impression — Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)
Case T-367/17: Judgment of the General Court of 18 October 2018 — Linak v EUIPO -ChangZhou Kaidi Electrical (Electrically operated lifting column) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing an electrically operated lifting column — Earlier Community design — Ground for invalidity — No individual character — Informed user — No different overall impression — Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)
OJ C 436, 3.12.2018, p. 44–44
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
3.12.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 436/44 |
Judgment of the General Court of 18 October 2018 — Linak v EUIPO -ChangZhou Kaidi Electrical (Electrically operated lifting column)
(Case T-367/17) (1)
((Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing an electrically operated lifting column - Earlier Community design - Ground for invalidity - No individual character - Informed user - No different overall impression - Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002))
(2018/C 436/61)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Linak A/S (Nordborg, Denmark) (represented by: V. von Bomhard and J. Fuhrmann, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented initially by: G. Sakalaite-Orlovskiene and A. Folliard-Monguiral, and subsequently by G. Sakalaite-Orlovskiene and J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: ChangZhou Kaidi Electrical Co. Ltd (Changzhou, China)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 March 2017 (Case R 1411/2015-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Linak and ChangZhou Kaidi Electrical.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Linak A/S to pay the costs. |