This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TN0769
Case T-769/15: Action brought on 29 December 2015 — SeNaPro v OHIM — Paltentaler Splitt & Marmorwerke (Dolokorn)
Case T-769/15: Action brought on 29 December 2015 — SeNaPro v OHIM — Paltentaler Splitt & Marmorwerke (Dolokorn)
Case T-769/15: Action brought on 29 December 2015 — SeNaPro v OHIM — Paltentaler Splitt & Marmorwerke (Dolokorn)
OJ C 78, 29.2.2016, p. 30–30
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
29.2.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 78/30 |
Action brought on 29 December 2015 — SeNaPro v OHIM — Paltentaler Splitt & Marmorwerke (Dolokorn)
(Case T-769/15)
(2016/C 078/41)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: SeNaPro GmbH (Pommelsbrunn, Germany) (represented by: A. Schröder, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Paltentaler Splitt & Marmorwerke GmbH (Rottenmann, Austria)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Dolokorn’ — Application No 11 877 181
Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 October 2015 in Case R 2643/2014-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order OHIM to pay its own costs and those incurred by SeNaPro GmbH. |
Plea in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 75 and Article 76(1) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009. |