Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014TN0030

    Case T-30/14: Action brought on 13 January 2014 — Laverana v OHIM (BIO — INGRÉDIENTS VÉGÉTAUX — PROPRE FABRICATION)

    OJ C 85, 22.3.2014, p. 22–23 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    22.3.2014   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 85/22


    Action brought on 13 January 2014 — Laverana v OHIM (BIO — INGRÉDIENTS VÉGÉTAUX — PROPRE FABRICATION)

    (Case T-30/14)

    2014/C 85/39

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Laverana GmbH & Co. KG (Wennigsen, Germany) (represented by J. Wachinger und M. Zöbisch, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 11 November 2013 in Case R 1749/2013-4 and authorise the publication of the application for registration of the Community trade mark No 11 642 527 for goods and services in Classes 3, 5 and 35;

    in the alternative, annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 11 November 2013 in Case R 1749/2013-4 and refer the case back to the Office so that it adopts a new decision;

    in the alternative, annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 11 November 2013 in Case R 1749/2013-4;

    order the defendant to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark in black and white, including the word elements ‘BIO — INGRÉDIENTS VÉGÉTAUX — PROPRE FABRICATION’ for goods and services in Classes 3, 5 an 35 — application for registration of Community trade mark No 11 642 527

    Decision of the Examiner: Refused the application in part

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

    Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009.


    Top