This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012FA0113
Case F-113/12: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 11 December 2013 — Balionyte-Merle v Commission (Civil service — Open competition — Notice of competition EPSO/AD/204/10 — Failure to include the applicant on the reserve list — Assessment of candidates’ general competencies — Assessment on the basis of performance in tests at the assessment centre — Consistency between the mark obtained and comments appearing in the competency passport)
Case F-113/12: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 11 December 2013 — Balionyte-Merle v Commission (Civil service — Open competition — Notice of competition EPSO/AD/204/10 — Failure to include the applicant on the reserve list — Assessment of candidates’ general competencies — Assessment on the basis of performance in tests at the assessment centre — Consistency between the mark obtained and comments appearing in the competency passport)
Case F-113/12: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 11 December 2013 — Balionyte-Merle v Commission (Civil service — Open competition — Notice of competition EPSO/AD/204/10 — Failure to include the applicant on the reserve list — Assessment of candidates’ general competencies — Assessment on the basis of performance in tests at the assessment centre — Consistency between the mark obtained and comments appearing in the competency passport)
OJ C 71, 8.3.2014, p. 34–34
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
8.3.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 71/34 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 11 December 2013 — Balionyte-Merle v Commission
(Case F-113/12) (1)
(Civil service - Open competition - Notice of competition EPSO/AD/204/10 - Failure to include the applicant on the reserve list - Assessment of candidates’ general competencies - Assessment on the basis of performance in tests at the assessment centre - Consistency between the mark obtained and comments appearing in the competency passport)
(2014/C 71/65)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Vilija Balionyte-Merle (Auderghem, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi and A. Tymen, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Eggers and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision of the selection board not to include the applicant on the reserve list for competition EPSO/AD/204/10 and for annulment of the decision to reject the complaint.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Ms Balionyte-Merle to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |