Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62012CB0073

    Case C-73/12: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 July 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di Pace di Revere — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Ahmed Ettaghi (Reference for a preliminary ruling — No description of the dispute in the main proceedings — Manifest inadmissibility)

    OJ C 303, 6.10.2012, p. 8–8 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    6.10.2012   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 303/8


    Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 July 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di Pace di Revere — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Ahmed Ettaghi

    (Case C-73/12) (1)

    (Reference for a preliminary ruling - No description of the dispute in the main proceedings - Manifest inadmissibility)

    2012/C 303/15

    Language of the case: Italian

    Referring court

    Giudice di Pace di Revere

    Criminal proceedings against

    Ahmed Ettaghi

    Re:

    Reference for a preliminary ruling — Giudice di Pace di Revere — Interpretation of Articles 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 15 and 16 of Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98) and of Article 4(3) TEU — National legislation imposing a fine on a third-country national who has entered or stayed in the country illegally — Admissibility of the criminal offence of illegal stay — Possibility of substituting the fine with an order for expulsion with immediate effect for a period of at least five years or with a home detention (‘permanenza domiciliare’) sentence — Obligations of the Member States during the period prescribed for the transposition of a directive

    Operative part of the order

    The reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di Pace di Revere (Italy), by decision of 26 January 2012, is clearly inadmissible.


    (1)  OJ C 118, 21.4.2012.


    Top