This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012CN0170
Case C-170/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 11 April 2012 — Peter Pinckney v KDG mediatech AG
Case C-170/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 11 April 2012 — Peter Pinckney v KDG mediatech AG
Case C-170/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 11 April 2012 — Peter Pinckney v KDG mediatech AG
OJ C 174, 16.6.2012, p. 19–19
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
16.6.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 174/19 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 11 April 2012 — Peter Pinckney v KDG mediatech AG
(Case C-170/12)
2012/C 174/29
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Cour de cassation
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Peter Pinckney
Defendant: KDG mediatech AG
Questions referred
1. |
Is Article 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (1) to be interpreted as meaning that, in the event of an alleged infringement of copyright committed by means of content placed online on a website,
|
2. |
Is the answer to Question 1 the same if the alleged infringement of copyright results, not from the placing of dematerialised content online, but, as in the present case, from the online sale of a material carrier medium which reproduces that content? |