Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62009CA0240

    Case C-240/09: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 March 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky (Slovakia)) — Lesoochranárske zoskupenie VLK v Ministerstvo životného prostredia Slovenskej republiky (Environment — Aarhus Convention — Public participation in the decision-making process and access to justice in environmental matters — Direct effect)

    OJ C 130, 30.4.2011, p. 4–5 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    30.4.2011   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 130/4


    Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 March 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky (Slovakia)) — Lesoochranárske zoskupenie VLK v Ministerstvo životného prostredia Slovenskej republiky

    (Case C-240/09) (1)

    (Environment - Aarhus Convention - Public participation in the decision-making process and access to justice in environmental matters - Direct effect)

    2011/C 130/07

    Language of the case: Slovakian

    Referring court

    Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Lesoochranárske zoskupenie VLK

    Defendant: Ministerstvo životného prostredia Slovenskej republiky

    Re:

    Request for a preliminary ruling — Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic — Interpretation of Article 9(3) of the Council Decision of 17 February 2005 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the Aarhus Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters (OJ 2005 L 124, p. 1) — Direct effect of that provision — Interpretation of the concept of ‘acts of public authorities’ — Inclusion or not of the decisions of a public authority, the unlawfulness of which lies in their effect on the environment

    Operative part of the judgment

    Article 9(3) of the Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters approved on behalf of the European Community by Council Decision 2005/370/EC of 17 February 2005 does not have direct effect in European Union law. It is, however, for the referring court to interpret, to the fullest extent possible, the procedural rules relating to the conditions to be met in order to bring administrative or judicial proceedings in accordance with the objectives of Article 9(3) of that convention and the objective of effective judicial protection of the rights conferred by European Union law, in order to enable an environmental protection organisation, such as the Lesoochranárske zoskupenie, to challenge before a court a decision taken following administrative proceedings liable to be contrary to European Union environmental law.


    (1)  OJ C 233, 26.9.2009.


    Top