Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 April 2013.#GRP Security v Court of Auditors of the European Union.#Arbitration clause — Public service contracts — Surveillance and security services for the buildings of the Court of Auditors — Action for annulment — Decision unilaterally to terminate the contract with application for payment of damages and interest — Measure of a contractual nature — Action not reclassified — Inadmissibility — Decision to impose a penalty of exclusion for three months — Interest in bringing proceedings — Rights of defence — Serious breach of obligations — Principle that penalties must have a proper legal basis — Misuse of powers — Proportionality.#Case T‑87/11.

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 April 2013.
GRP Security v Court of Auditors of the European Union.
Arbitration clause — Public service contracts — Surveillance and security services for the buildings of the Court of Auditors — Action for annulment — Decision unilaterally to terminate the contract with application for payment of damages and interest — Measure of a contractual nature — Action not reclassified — Inadmissibility — Decision to impose a penalty of exclusion for three months — Interest in bringing proceedings — Rights of defence — Serious breach of obligations — Principle that penalties must have a proper legal basis — Misuse of powers — Proportionality.
Case T‑87/11.

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 April 2013.
GRP Security v Court of Auditors of the European Union.
Arbitration clause — Public service contracts — Surveillance and security services for the buildings of the Court of Auditors — Action for annulment — Decision unilaterally to terminate the contract with application for payment of damages and interest — Measure of a contractual nature — Action not reclassified — Inadmissibility — Decision to impose a penalty of exclusion for three months — Interest in bringing proceedings — Rights of defence — Serious breach of obligations — Principle that penalties must have a proper legal basis — Misuse of powers — Proportionality.
Case T‑87/11.

European Court Reports 2013 -00000

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2013:161