Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62006CJ0171

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 March 2007.
T.I.M.E. ART Uluslararasi Saat Ticareti ve diş Ticaret AŞ v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and Devinlec Développement Innovation Leclerc SA.
Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8(1)(b) - Figurative mark - Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier national trade mark - Likelihood of confusion.
Case C-171/06 P.

European Court Reports 2007 I-00041*

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2007:171





Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 March 2007 – T.I.M.E. ART v OHIM

(Case C‑171/06 P)

Appeal – Community trade mark – Regulation (EC) No 40/94 − Article 8(1)(b) − Figurative mark − Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier national trade mark – Likelihood of confusion

1.                     Appeals – Pleas in law – Plea submitted for the first time in the context of the appeal – Inadmissible (see paras 22-24)

2.                     Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an identical or similar earlier mark registered for identical or similar goods or services (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 33-41)

3.                     Appeals – Pleas in law – Mistaken assessment of the facts – Inadmissibility – Review by the Court of the assessment of the evidence – Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 225(1) EC; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see para. 51)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 January 2005 in Case T-147/03 Devinlec Développement Innovation Leclerc v OHIM annulling, upon application by the proprietor of the national figurative mark QUANTIEME for goods in Classes 14 and 18, Decision R 109/2002-3 of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 January 2003 which annulled the decision of the Opposition Division refusing registration of the figurative Community trade mark QUANTUM for goods in Class 14.

Operative part

 

The appeal is dismissed.

 

T.I.M.E. ART Uluslararasi Saat Ticareti ve diş Ticaret AŞ is ordered to pay the costs.

Top