EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document E2019J0013
Judgment of the court of 10 December 2020 in Case E-13/19 Hraðbraut ehf. v The Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, Verzlunarskóli Íslands ses., Tækniskólinn ehf., and Menntaskóli Borgarfjarðar ehf. (Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Public service contract – Article 37 EEA – Notion of ‘services’ – Upper secondary education) 2021/C 113/06
Judgment of the court of 10 December 2020 in Case E-13/19 Hraðbraut ehf. v The Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, Verzlunarskóli Íslands ses., Tækniskólinn ehf., and Menntaskóli Borgarfjarðar ehf. (Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Public service contract – Article 37 EEA – Notion of ‘services’ – Upper secondary education) 2021/C 113/06
Judgment of the court of 10 December 2020 in Case E-13/19 Hraðbraut ehf. v The Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, Verzlunarskóli Íslands ses., Tækniskólinn ehf., and Menntaskóli Borgarfjarðar ehf. (Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Public service contract – Article 37 EEA – Notion of ‘services’ – Upper secondary education) 2021/C 113/06
OJ C 113, 31.3.2021, p. 11–11
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
31.3.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 113/11 |
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
of 10 December 2020
in Case E-13/19
Hraðbraut ehf. v The Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, Verzlunarskóli Íslands ses., Tækniskólinn ehf., and Menntaskóli Borgarfjarðar ehf.
(Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Public service contract – Article 37 EEA – Notion of ‘services’ – Upper secondary education)
(2021/C 113/06)
In Case E-13/19, Hraðbraut ehf. v The Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, Verzlunarskóli Íslands ses., Tækniskólinn ehf., and Menntaskóli Borgarfjarðar ehf. – REQUEST to the Court under Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by the Public Procurement Complaints Committee (Kærunefnd útboðsmála) concerning the interpretation of Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC, and in particular point (9) of Article 2(1) and Article 74 thereof, the Court, composed of Páll Hreinsson, President, Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur), and Bernd Hammermann, Judges, gave judgment on 10 December 2020, the operative part of which is as follows:
Contracts with characteristics such as those described in the request, which do not have as their object the provision of services within the meaning of Directive 2014/24/EU, do not constitute public service contracts within the meaning of point (9) of Article 2(1) of that directive.