EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TJ0035
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#SFD S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ALLNUTRITION DESIGNED FOR MOTIVATION – Earlier EU word marks ALLMAX NUTRITION – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-35/21.
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 30 March 2022.
SFD S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ALLNUTRITION DESIGNED FOR MOTIVATION – Earlier EU word marks ALLMAX NUTRITION – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
Case T-35/21.
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 30 March 2022.
SFD S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ALLNUTRITION DESIGNED FOR MOTIVATION – Earlier EU word marks ALLMAX NUTRITION – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
Case T-35/21.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:173
- Date of document:
- 30/03/2022
- Date lodged:
- 22/01/2021
- Author:
- General Court
- Country or organisation from which the request originates:
- Poland
- Form:
- Judgment
- Additional information:
- POURVOI C-383/22 P
- Authentic language:
- English
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment - unfounded
- Judge-Rapporteur:
- Kreuschitz
- Treaty:
- Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Affected by case:
-
- Related judicial information 62021TA0035
- Review of judgement requested by 62022CN0383
- Instruments cited in case law:
-
- 32009R0207: N 1 13 14
- 32009R0207-A41: N 5
- 32009R0207-A07P1LB: N 63
- 32009R0207-A08P1LB: N 7 15 19 20 90
- 32017R1001: N 14
- 32017R1001-A46: N 5
- 32017R1001-A07P1LB: N 63
- 32017R1001-A08P1LB: N 7 17
- 61997CJ0039-N17: N 80
- 62001TJ0162-N30: N 18
- 62001TJ0162-N31: N 18
- 62001TJ0162-N32: N 18
- 62001TJ0162-N33: N 18
- 62002CJ0064-N31: N 63
- 62002CJ0064-N32: N 63
- 62002CJ0064-N44: N 63
- 62003TJ0081-N74: N 80
- 62004TJ0029-N57: N 51
- 62004TJ0256-N42: N 22
- 62004TJ0256-N57: N 41
- 62005CJ0334-N35: N 35
- 62005CJ0334-N41: N 37
- 62005CJ0334-N42: N 37
- 62005TJ0434-N47: N 44
- 62005TJ0443-N37: N 29
- 62006CJ0193-N42: N 37
- 62006CJ0193-N43: N 37
- 62006TJ0134-N70: N 85
- 62006TJ0205-N54: N 58
- 62008CJ0398-N36: N 63
- 62008CJ0398-N39: N 63
- 62008TJ0258-N57: N 44
- 62011CJ0090-N32: N 59
- 62011CJ0090-N38: N 59
- 62011TJ0623-N38: N 51
- 62012CJ0591-N12: N 13
- 62014TJ0195-N42: N 42
- 62014TJ0262-N47: N 47
- 62015TJ0736-N88: N 45
- 62016TJ0403-N26: N 47
- 62016TJ0721-N66: N 51
- 62017CJ0519-N73: N 86
- 62018CJ0702-N2: N 13
- 62018TJ0059-N33: N 47
- 62018TJ0711-N63: N 44
- 62019TJ0329-N36: N 57
- Notes relating to the decision:
-
- 1. Martin, Stefan: Validité de la marque - Motifs relatifs - Procédure d’opposition – Opposition fondée sur l’article 8, §1(b) du RMUE – Appréciation globale du risque de confusion – Élément commun peu distinctif (oui) – Autres éléments composant les marques encore moins distinctifs (oui) – Risque de confusion (oui), Propriétés intellectuelles 2022, n° 84, p. 110 (FR)
- Subject matter:
- Case law directory code:
-
