Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62010CN0412

Case C-412/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (Queen's Bench Division) (United Kingdom) made on 18 August 2010 — Deo Antoine Homawoo v GMF Assurances SA

OJ C 301, 6.11.2010, p. 9–10 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
18/08/2010
Author:
Court of Justice
Form:
Judicial information
Authentic language:
English
Type of procedure:
Reference for a preliminary ruling
Link
Select all documents mentioning this document
Case affecting:
Link

6.11.2010   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/9

Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (Queen's Bench Division) (United Kingdom) made on 18 August 2010 — Deo Antoine Homawoo v GMF Assurances SA

(Case C-412/10)

()

2010/C 301/12

Language of the case: English

Referring court

High Court of Justice (Queen's Bench Division)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Deo Antoine Homawoo

Defendant: GMF Assurances SA

Questions referred

1.

Are Articles 31 and 32 of Regulation (BC) No 864/2007 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II), in conjunction with Article 297 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, to be interpreted to require a national court to apply Rome II, and in particular Article 15(c) thereof, in a case where the event giving rise to the damage occurred on 29th August 2007?

2.

Is the answer to question 1 affected by either of the following facts:

(i)

that the proceedings seeking compensation for damage were commenced on 8th January 2009;

(ii)

that the national court had not made any determination of the applicable law before 11 January 2009?

(1)  OJ L 199, p. 40

Top