23.8.2016   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 228/16

(1)

By Regulation (EU) No 513/2013 (3), the European Commission (‘the Commission’) imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports into the European Union (‘the Union’) of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules (‘modules’) and key components (i.e. cells and wafers) originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China (‘the PRC’).

(2)

A group of exporting producers gave a mandate to the China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products (‘CCCME’) to submit a price undertaking on their behalf to the Commission, which they did. It is clear from the terms of that price undertaking that it constitutes a bundle of individual price undertakings for each exporting producer, which is, for reasons of practicality of administration, coordinated by the CCCME.

(3)

By Decision 2013/423/EU (4), the Commission accepted that price undertaking with regard to the provisional anti-dumping duty. By Regulation (EU) No 748/2013 (5), the Commission amended Regulation (EU) No 513/2013 to introduce the technical changes necessary due to the acceptance of the undertaking with regard to the provisional anti-dumping duty.

(4)

By Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 (6), the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports into the Union of modules and cells originating in or consigned from the PRC (‘the products concerned’). By Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 (7), the Council also imposed a definitive countervailing duty on imports into the Union of the products concerned.

(5)

Following the notification of an amended version of the price undertaking by a group of exporting producers (‘the exporting producers’) together with the CCCME, the Commission confirmed by Implementing Decision 2013/707/EU (8) the acceptance of the price undertaking as amended (‘the undertaking’) for the period of application of definitive measures. The Annex to this Decision lists the exporting producers for whom the undertaking was accepted, inter alia:

(6)

By Implementing Decision 2014/657/EU (9) the Commission accepted a proposal by the exporting producers together with the CCCME for clarifications concerning the implementation of the undertaking for the products concerned covered by the undertaking, that is modules and cells originating in or consigned from the PRC, currently falling within CN codes ex 8541 40 90 (TARIC codes 8541409021, 8541409029, 8541409031 and 8541409039) produced by the exporting producers (‘product covered’). The anti-dumping and countervailing duties referred to in recital 4 above, together with the undertaking, are jointly referred to as ‘measures’.

(7)

By Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/866 (10) the Commission withdrew the acceptance of the undertaking for three exporting producers.

(8)

By Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1403 (11) the Commission withdrew the acceptance of the undertaking for another exporting producer.

(9)

By Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2018 (12) the Commission withdrew the acceptance of the undertaking for two exporting producers.

(10)

The Commission initiated an expiry review investigation under Article 11(2) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation by a Notice of Initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Union  (13) on 5 December 2015.

(11)

The Commission initiated an expiry review investigation under Article 18 of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation by a Notice of Initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Union  (14) on 5 December 2015.

(12)

The Commission also initiated a partial interim review under Article 11(3) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 19 of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation by a Notice of Initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Union  (15) on 5 December 2015.

(13)

By Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/115 (16) the Commission withdrew the acceptance of the undertaking for another exporting producer.

(14)

By Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/185 (17), the Commission extended the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 on imports of the products concerned originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China to imports of the product concerned consigned from Malaysia and Taiwan, whether declared as originating in Malaysia and in Taiwan or not.

(15)

By Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/184 (18), the Commission extended the definitive countervailing duty imposed by Council Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 on imports of the products concerned originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China to imports of the product concerned consigned from Malaysia and Taiwan, whether declared as originating in Malaysia and in Taiwan or not.

(16)

By Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1045 (19) the Commission withdrew the acceptance of the undertaking for another exporting producer.

(17)

By Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1382 (20) the Commission withdrew the acceptance of the undertaking for another five exporting producers.

(18)

The exporting producers agreed, inter alia, not to sell the product covered to the first independent customer in the Union below a certain minimum import price (‘the MIP’) within the associated annual level of imports to the Union (‘annual level’) laid down in the undertaking.

(19)

The exporting producers also agreed to sell the product covered only by means of direct sales. For the purpose of the undertaking, a direct sale is defined as a sale either to the first independent customer in the Union or via a related party in the Union listed in the undertaking.

(20)

The undertaking sets out, in a non-exhaustive list, the breaches of the undertaking. That list includes, in particular, issuing a commercial invoice (‘undertaking invoice’ as defined in the Implementing Regulations referred to in recital 4) or resale invoice for which the underlying financial transaction (e.g. the amount of money actually received from the buyer after any adjustments for credit/debit notes and the like) is not in conformity with the face value of the commercial invoice.

(21)

The list of breaches also includes indirect sales to the Union by companies other than listed in the undertaking and taking part in a trading system leading to a risk of circumvention.

(22)

The undertaking also obliges the exporting producers to provide the Commission on a quarterly basis with detailed information on all their export sales to and resales in the Union (‘the quarterly reports’). This implies that the data submitted in these quarterly reports must be complete and correct and the reported transactions fully comply with the terms of the undertaking.

(23)

The exporting producer is liable for the breach of any of its related parties, whether or not listed in the undertaking.

(24)

While monitoring compliance with the undertaking, the Commission verified information submitted by Osda Solar, Qixin Solar, and Linuo that was relevant to the undertaking. The Commission also received evidence from customs authorities of one Member State on the basis of Article 8(9) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 13(9) and of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation.

(25)

The findings set out in recitals 26 to 34 address the problems identified for Osda Solar, Qixin Solar and Linuo which oblige the Commission to withdraw the acceptance of the undertaking for these exporting producers.

(26)

In its quarterly reports, Osda Solar had reported a sales transaction of the product covered to an allegedly unrelated importer in the Union and had issued an undertaking invoice. Based on the information available to the Commission, the importer involved in the above transaction was related to Osda Solar. As this importer is not listed as related party in the undertaking, Osda Solar breached the terms of the undertaking as described in recitals 19 and 21.

(27)

In addition, this related importer issued at least one resale invoice to the final customer in the Union for which the MIP was not respected. Therefore, Osda Solar breached the terms of the undertaking as described in recitals 18 and 23.

(28)

In its quarterly reports, Qixin Solar had reported a sales transaction of the product covered to an allegedly unrelated importer in the Union and had issued an undertaking invoice. Based on the information available to the Commission, the importer involved in the above transaction was related to Qixin Solar. As this importer is not listed as related party in the undertaking, Qixin Solar breached the terms of the undertaking as described in recitals 19 and 21.

(29)

In addition, the related importer issued at least one resale invoice to the final customer in the Union for which the MIP was not respected. Therefore, Qixin Solar breached the terms of the undertaking as described in recitals 18 and 23.

(30)

Moreover, in the month in which the transaction referred to in recital 29 had taken place, Qixin Solar carried out direct sales of the product covered to the same customer, thus entering into a trading system leading to cross-compensation. Therefore, Qixin Solar breached the terms of the undertaking as described in recital 21.

(31)

In its quarterly reports, Linuo had reported a sales transaction of the product covered to an allegedly unrelated importer in the Union and had issued an undertaking invoice. Based on the information available to the Commission, the importer involved in the above transaction was related to Linuo. As this importer is not listed as related party in the undertaking, Linuo breached the terms of the undertaking as described in recitals 19 and 21.

(32)

In addition, this related importer issued at least one re-sale invoice to the final customer in the Union for which the MIP was not respected. Therefore, Linuo breached the terms of the undertaking as described in recitals 18 and 23.

(33)

The information contained in the quarterly reports and the evidence received demonstrate that the re-sale invoices referred to in recitals 27, 29 and 32 and the undertaking invoices referred to in recital 30 are linked to the following transactions.

Therefore, in accordance with Article 3(2)(b) of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 and Article 2(2)(b) of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013, these invoices are declared invalid. The customs debt incurred at the time of acceptance of the declaration for release into free circulation should be recovered by the national customs authorities under Article 105(3)-(6) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (21) when the withdrawal of the undertaking in relation to the three exporting producers together with their related companies in the Union enters into force. The national customs authorities responsible for the collection of duties will be informed accordingly.

In this context, the Commission recalls that pursuant to Article 3(1)(b) read in conjunction with Annex III, No 7 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 and to Article 2(1)(b) read in conjunction with Annex 2, No 7 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013, imports are only exempted from duties if the invoice indicates the price and possible rebates. Where those conditions are not complied with, duties are due, even where the commercial invoice accompanying the goods has not been invalidated by the Commission.

(34)

The undertaking stipulates that a breach by an individual exporting producer does not automatically lead to the withdrawal of the acceptance of the undertaking for all exporting producers. In such a case, the Commission shall assess the impact of that particular breach on the practicability of the undertaking with the effect for all exporting producers and the CCCME.

(35)

The Commission has accordingly assessed the impact of the breaches by Osda Solar, Qixin Solar, and Linuo on the practicability of the undertaking with the effect for all exporting producers and the CCCME.

(36)

Although the breaches by the three exporting producers show a similar pattern, the Commission considers that the responsibility for the breaches lies with the exporting producers in question; the monitoring has so far not revealed systematic breaches of this pattern by a major number of exporting producers or the CCCME. At present, the Commission considers that the overall functioning of the undertaking is not affected and that there are no grounds for withdrawal of the acceptance of the undertaking for all exporting producers and the CCCME.

(37)

However, by letter of 11 July 2016 the Commission informed the CCCME about the above breaches by the three exporting producers showing a similar pattern and stated at the same time that should breaches of a similar pattern persist in the future, the Commission might re-assess the overall practicability of the undertaking.

(38)

Interested parties were granted the opportunity to be heard and to comment pursuant to Article 8(9) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 13(9) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation.

(39)

Two exporting producers submitted limited comments after the disclosure on the sales channels or on the compliance with the MIP. However, the comments were of a confidential nature and despite the Commission's request no non-confidential summaries were provided within the deadline set for that purpose. Under Article 19(3) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 29(3) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation, these comments may thus be disregarded. In any event, the comments received were not such as to alter the Commission's assessment regarding the breaches referred to in recitals 26 to 32 and the invalidation of the undertaking invoices referred to in recital 33.

(40)

Therefore, in accordance with Article 8(9) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation, Article 13(9) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation and also in accordance with the terms of the undertaking, the Commission has concluded that the acceptance of the undertaking for Osda Solar, Qixin Solar and Linuo together with their related companies in the Union shall be withdrawn.

(41)

Accordingly, pursuant to Article 8(9) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 13(9) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation, the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Article 1 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 and the definitive countervailing duty imposed by Article 1 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 automatically apply to imports originating in or consigned from the PRC of the product concerned and produced by Osda Solar (TARIC additional code B859), Qixin Solar (TARIC additional code B860) and Linuo (TARIC additional code B869) as of the day of entry into force of this Regulation.

(42)

For information purposes the table in the Annex to this Regulation lists the exporting producers for whom the acceptance of the undertaking by Implementing Decision 2013/707/EU is not affected,