Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2006/326/55

    Case C-420/06: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Schwerin (Germany) lodged on 16 October 2006 — Rüdiger Jager v Amt für Landwirtschaft Bützow

    OJ C 326, 30.12.2006, p. 27–27 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    30.12.2006   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 326/27


    Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Schwerin (Germany) lodged on 16 October 2006 — Rüdiger Jager v Amt für Landwirtschaft Bützow

    (Case C-420/06)

    (2006/C 326/55)

    Language of the case: German

    Referring court

    Verwaltungsgericht Schwerin

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Rüdiger Jager

    Defendant: Amt für Landwirtschaft Bützow

    Question referred

    Can Article 2(2) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests (1) be construed as meaning that a provision imposing a more favourable penalty (concerning livestock aid) is to be applied retroactively even if that provision in principle only applies for a period of time during which livestock aid in the Member State concerned is no longer granted as a direct payment has been introduced?


    (1)  OJ 1995 L 312, p. 1.


    Top