Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62023TN0066

    Case T-66/23: Action brought on 13 February 2023 — Aesculap v EUIPO — Aeneas (AESKUCARE Allergy)

    OJ C 112, 27.3.2023, p. 48–49 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    27.3.2023   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 112/48


    Action brought on 13 February 2023 — Aesculap v EUIPO — Aeneas (AESKUCARE Allergy)

    (Case T-66/23)

    (2023/C 112/63)

    Language in which the application was lodged: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Aesculap AG (Tuttlingen, Germany) (represented by: N. Hebeis, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Aeneas GmbH & Co. KG (Wendelsheim, Germany)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

    Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU figurative mark AESKUCARE Allergy — Application No 17 917 493

    Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

    Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 November 2022 in Case R 20/2022-2

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    annul the contested decision in so far it annulled the decision of the Opposition Division of EUIPO of 30 November 2021 and rejected the opposition in respect of the claimed goods and services in Classes 5, 42 and 44;

    order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court and order the intervener to pay the costs of the proceedings before EUIPO.

    Plea in law

    Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.


    Top