Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62018TN0107

    Case T-107/18: Action brought on 20 February 2018 — Aytekin v EUIPO — Dienne Salotti (Dienne)

    OJ C 134, 16.4.2018, p. 38–38 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    20/02/2018
    Date lodged:
    20/02/2018
    Author:
    General Court
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    English
    Type of procedure:
    Action for annulment
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    16.4.2018   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 134/38

    Action brought on 20 February 2018 — Aytekin v EUIPO — Dienne Salotti (Dienne)

    (Case T-107/18)

    (2018/C 134/54)

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    Parties

    Applicant(s): Erkan Aytekin (Ankara, Turkey) (represented by: V. Martín Santos, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Dienne Salotti SRL a socio unico (Altamura, Italy)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

    Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark Dienne — Application for registration No 15 080 302

    Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

    Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 December 2017 in Case R 1444/2017-2

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the contested decision;

    —

    order Applicant/Intervener and/or the EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the Appellant in connection with this appeal, and all procedural costs generated by EUIPO decisions.

    Plea in law

    —

    Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 2017/1001.
    Top