Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62017CN0699

    Case C-699/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 14 December 2017 — Allianz Vorsorgekasse AG

    OJ C 104, 19.3.2018, p. 15–15 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    19.3.2018   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 104/15


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 14 December 2017 — Allianz Vorsorgekasse AG

    (Case C-699/17)

    (2018/C 104/18)

    Language of the case: German

    Referring court

    Verwaltungsgerichtshof

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Appellant: Allianz Vorsorgekasse AG

    Participating parties: Bundestheater-Holding GmbH, Burgtheater GmbH, Wiener Staatsoper GmbH, Volksoper Wien GmbH, ART for ART Theaterservice GmbH, fair-finance Vorsorgekasse AG

    Question referred

    Are the provisions of Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement (1) and/or Articles 49 and 56 TFEU, and the principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination and the obligation of transparency which derive from them in respect of public procurement, applicable to the conclusion of contracts by a contracting authority with company provident funds in respect of the management and investment of contributions in cases where the conclusion of the contract and hence the choice of provident fund requires the approval of the workforce or its representatives and can therefore not be done by the contracting authority alone?


    (1)  Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC, OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65.


    Top