Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013TA0426

    Case T-426/13: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2015 — L'Oréal v OHIM — Cosmetica Cabinas (AINHOA) (Community trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Community word mark AINHOA — Genuine use of the mark — Article 15(1)(a) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Form differing in elements which do not alter the mark’s distinctive character)

    OJ C 389, 23.11.2015, p. 35–35 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    23.11.2015   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 389/35


    Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2015 — L'Oréal v OHIM — Cosmetica Cabinas (AINHOA)

    (Case T-426/13) (1)

    ((Community trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Community word mark AINHOA - Genuine use of the mark - Article 15(1)(a) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Form differing in elements which do not alter the mark’s distinctive character))

    (2015/C 389/36)

    Language of the case: Spanish

    Parties

    Applicant: L'Oréal (Paris, France) (represented by: H. Granado Carpenter and M. L. Polo Carreño, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: O. Mondéjar Ortuño and A. Schifko, agents)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Cosmetica Cabinas SL (El Masnou, Spain) (represented by: L. Montoya Terán and J.-B. Devaureix, lawyers)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 June 2013 (Case R 1642/2012-1), relating to revocation proceedings between L’Oréal and Cosmetica Cabinas SL.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders L’Oréal to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 304, 19.10.2013.


    Top