EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010TO0203
Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 December 2011.#Stichting Woonpunt and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Scheme of aid granted by the Netherlands to housing corporations – Existing aid – Decision accepting Member State’s commitments – Decision declaring new aid compatible – Action for annulment – Not individually concerned – No interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility.#Case T-203/10.
Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 December 2011.
Stichting Woonpunt and Others v European Commission.
State aid – Scheme of aid granted by the Netherlands to housing corporations – Existing aid – Decision accepting Member State’s commitments – Decision declaring new aid compatible – Action for annulment – Not individually concerned – No interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility.
Case T-203/10.
Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 December 2011.
Stichting Woonpunt and Others v European Commission.
State aid – Scheme of aid granted by the Netherlands to housing corporations – Existing aid – Decision accepting Member State’s commitments – Decision declaring new aid compatible – Action for annulment – Not individually concerned – No interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility.
Case T-203/10.
European Court Reports 2011 II-00462*
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2011:766
- Date of document:
- 16/12/2011
- Date lodged:
- 30/04/2010
- Author:
- General Court
- Country or organisation from which the request originates:
- Netherlands
- Form:
- Order
- Additional information:
- POURVOI C-132/12 P
- Authentic language:
- Dutch
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment - inadmissible, Application to intervene - decision unnecessary
- Applicant:
- Individual
- Defendant:
- EU institutions and bodies, European Commission
- Judge-Rapporteur:
- Wiszniewska-Białecka
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Affected by case:
-
- Declared void by 62012CJ0132
- Annulment requested by 62012CN0132
- Instruments cited in case law:
-
- 12008E263: N 15 24 62
- 12008E263-L4: N 25 52
- 31991Q0530-A116P1: N 17
- 31991Q0530-A113: N 22
- 31991Q0530-A114P3: N 22
- 31991Q0530-A114P4: N 22
- 31996R0659-A07P4: N 61
- 61962CJ0025: N 28
- 61982CJ0011: N 40
- 61985CJ0067: N 29
- 61988CJ0152: N 41
- 61998CJ0451: N 47
- 61999TO0011: N 49
- 62000CJ0298: N 28 29
- 62000TJ0254: N 43
- 62001TJ0301: N 61
- 62002TJ0309: N 29 47
- 62003CJ0182: N 37 39 41
- 62003TO0108: N 47 49
- 62004TJ0233: N 62
- 62004TO0387: N 55
- Notes relating to the decision:
-
- 1. Idot, Laurence: Recevabilité des recours contre des régimes d'aides, Europe 2012 Février Comm. nº 2 p.33 (FR)
- Subject matter:
- Case law directory code:
-
Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 December 2011 – Stichting Woonpunt and Others v Commission
(Case T-203/10)
State aid – Scheme of aid granted by the Netherlands to housing corporations – Existing aid – Decision accepting Member State’s commitments – Decision declaring new aid compatible – Action for annulment – Not individually concerned – No interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility
1. Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Commission decision declaring modifications to an existing aid scheme concerning the general system of financing housing corporations compatible with the internal market – Access to the aid scheme opened on the basis of objective criteria and without limitation as to the number of potential beneficiaries – Action of a company eligible for that scheme – Inadmissibility (Art. 263, fourth para., TFEU) (see paras 25-26, 28-30, 34-35, 42)
2. Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Interest in bringing proceedings – Action by a potential beneficiary company of duly notified State aid brought against the Commission decision declaring it incompatible with the internal market under certain restrictive conditions – Beneficiaries of new aid not able to invoke unfavourable legal effects in relation to a previous situation – Inadmissibility (Art. 263, fourth para., TFEU) (see paras 55, 58)
Re:
| APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 9963 final of 15 December 2009 relating to State aid E 2/2005 and N 642/2009 (Netherlands) – Existing and special project aid to housing corporations. |
Operative part
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
|
2. |
There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene of Vesteda Groep BV and the Netherlands Vereniging van Institutionele Beleggers in Vastgoed. |
|
3. |
Stichting Woonpunt, Stichting Com.wonen, Woningstichting Haag Wonen and Stichting Woonbedrijf SWS.Hhvl are ordered to bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
|
4. |
Vesteda Groep and the Netherlands Vereniging van Institutionele Beleggers in Vastgoed, applicants for leave to intervene, are ordered to bear their own costs. |
