This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010TJ0169
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 May 2012. # Grupo Osborne, SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark TORO XL - Early Community figurative mark XL - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 - No likelihood of confusion. # Case T-169/10.
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 May 2012.
Grupo Osborne, SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark TORO XL - Early Community figurative mark XL - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 - No likelihood of confusion.
Case T-169/10.
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 May 2012.
Grupo Osborne, SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark TORO XL - Early Community figurative mark XL - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 - No likelihood of confusion.
Case T-169/10.
European Court Reports 2012 -00000
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2012:261
Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 May 2012 — Grupo Osborne v OHIM — Industria Licorera Quezalteca (TORO XL)
(Case T‑169/10)
Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark TORO XL — Early Community figurative mark XL — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 — No likelihood of confusion
Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Relative grounds for refusal — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services — Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 20, 56‑58)
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 January 2010 (Case R 223/2009-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Industria Licorera Quezalteca, SA and Grupo Osborne, SA. |
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Annuls the decision of the second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 22 January 2010 (Case R 223/2009‑2); |
2. |
Orders OHIM to pay the costs. |