This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010CN0140
Case C-140/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie van België (Belgium) lodged on 17 March 2010 — Greenstar-Kanzi Europe NV v Jean Hustin and Jo Goossens
Case C-140/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie van België (Belgium) lodged on 17 March 2010 — Greenstar-Kanzi Europe NV v Jean Hustin and Jo Goossens
Case C-140/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie van België (Belgium) lodged on 17 March 2010 — Greenstar-Kanzi Europe NV v Jean Hustin and Jo Goossens
OJ C 161, 19.6.2010, p. 19–19
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 17/03/2010
- Date lodged:
- 17/03/2010
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- Dutch
- Type of procedure:
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- request for interpretation 31994R2100 article 104
- request for interpretation 31994R2100 article 11.1
- request for interpretation 31994R2100 article 13.1
- request for interpretation 31994R2100 article 13.2
- request for interpretation 31994R2100 article 13.3
- request for interpretation 31994R2100 article 16
- request for interpretation 31994R2100 article 27
- request for interpretation 31994R2100 article 94
- Link
|
19.6.2010 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 161/19 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie van België (Belgium) lodged on 17 March 2010 — Greenstar-Kanzi Europe NV v Jean Hustin and Jo Goossens
(Case C-140/10)
(2010/C 161/27)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Hof van Cassatie van België
Parties to the main proceedings
|
Applicants |
: |
Greenstar-Kanzi Europe NV |
||||
|
Defendants |
: |
|
Questions referred
|
1. |
Should Article 94 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 (1) of 27 July 1994 on Community plant variety rights, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 873/2004 (2) of 29 April 2004, read in conjunction with Articles 11(1), 13(1) to 13(3), 16, 27 and 104 of the aforementioned Regulation (EC) No 2100/94, be interpreted in such a way that the holder or the person enjoying the right of exploitation may bring an action for infringement against anyone who effects acts in respect of material which was sold or disposed of to him by a licensee of the right of exploitation if the limitations in the licensing contract between the licensee and the holder of the Community plant variety right that were stipulated to apply in the event of the sale of that material were not respected? |
|
2. |
If so, is it of significance for the assessment of the infringement that the person effecting the aforementioned act is aware or is deemed to be aware of the limitations thus imposed in the said licensing contract? |
