Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62008CA0511

    Case C-511/08: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany)) — Verbraucherzentrale Nordrhein-Westfalen eV v Handelsgesellschaft Heinrich Heine GmbH (Directive 97/7/EC — Consumer protection — Distance contracts — Right of withdrawal — Consumer charged with the cost of delivering the goods)

    OJ C 148, 5.6.2010, p. 6–7 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    5.6.2010   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 148/6


    Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 April 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany)) — Verbraucherzentrale Nordrhein-Westfalen eV v Handelsgesellschaft Heinrich Heine GmbH

    (Case C-511/08) (1)

    (Directive 97/7/EC - Consumer protection - Distance contracts - Right of withdrawal - Consumer charged with the cost of delivering the goods)

    2010/C 148/09

    Language of the case: German

    Referring court

    Bundesgerichtshof

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Verbraucherzentrale Nordrhein-Westfalen eV

    Defendant: Handelsgesellschaft Heinrich Heine GmbH

    Re:

    Preliminary ruling — Bundesgerichtshof — Interpretation of Article 6(1), second sentence, and Article 6(2) of Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 1997 on the protection of consumers in respect of distance contracts (OJ 1997 L 144, p. 19) — National legislation which allows the costs of delivering the goods to be charged to the consumer if he withdraws from the contract

    Operative part of the judgment

    Article 6(1), first subparagraph, second sentence, and Article 6(2) of Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 1997 on the protection of consumers in respect of distance contracts are to be interpreted as precluding national legislation which, in the context of a distance contract, requires the cost of delivering the goods to be charged to the consumer after he exercises his right of withdrawal.


    (1)  OJ C 32, 7.2.2009.


    Top