Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62007TJ0486

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 22 March 2011.
Ford Motor Company v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for figurative Community trade mark CA - Earlier Community word and figurative marks KA - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009).
Case T-486/07.

European Court Reports 2011 II-00058*

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2011:104

Date of document:
22/03/2011
Date lodged:
21/12/2007
Author:
General Court
Country or organisation from which the request originates:
Provisional data, United States
Form:
Judgment
Authentic language:
English
Type of procedure:
Action for annulment - unfounded
Treaty:
Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Link
Select all documents mentioning this document
Instruments cited in case law:





Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 22 March 2011 – Ford Motor v OHIM – Alkar Automotive (CA)

(Case T-486/07)

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for figurative Community trade mark CA – Earlier Community word and figurative marks KA – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 27, 92)

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 October 2007 (Case R 85/2006-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Ford Motor Company and Alkar Automotive, SA.

Information relating to the case

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Alkar Automotive, SA

Community trade mark sought:

Figurative mark CA for, inter alia, goods in Classes 9, 11 and 12 – Application No 3186764

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Ford Motor Company

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Community word and figurative marks KA for goods and services in Classes 9, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 21, 27, 32 and 37

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Opposition rejected in its entirety

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Appeal dismissed


Operative part

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders Ford Motor Company to pay the costs.

Top