Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62010TJ0542

Rettens dom (Tredje Afdeling) af 13. juni 2012.
XXXLutz Marken GmbH mod Kontoret for Harmonisering i det Indre Marked (Varemærker og Design) (KHIM).
EF-varemærker - indsigelsessag - ansøgning om EF-ordmærket CIRCON - det ældre EF-ordmærke CIRCULON - relativ registreringshindring - risiko for forveksling - lighed mellem tegnene - høj grad af særpræg - renommé - artikel 8, stk., litra b), i forordning (EF) nr. 207/2009 - sagsbehandlingen ved appelkamrene - retten til forsvar - artikel 75 og 76 i forordning nr. 207/2009.
Sag T-542/10.

Samling af Afgørelser 2012 -00000

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2012:294





Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 13 June 2012 —
XXXLutz Marken v OHIM — Meyer Manufacturing (CIRCON)

(Case T-542/10)

Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark CIRCON — Prior Community word mark CIRCULON — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Highly distinctive character — Goodwill — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Procedure before the Board of Appeal — Rights of the defence — Articles 75 and 76 of Regulation No 207/2009

1.                     Procedure — Application initiating proceedings — Formal requirements — Summary statement of pleas (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 21, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 44(1)(c)) (see para. 21)

2.                     Community trade mark — Procedural provisions — Decisions of the Office — Observance of the rights of the defence — Scope of the principle (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Arts 42(1), and 75) (see paras 70-72, 90)

3.                     Community trade mark — Appeals procedure — Action before the EU judicature — Jurisdiction of the General Court — Amendment of a decision by the Office — Scope (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 65(3)) (see para. 98)

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 September 2010 (Case R 40/2010-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Meyer Manufacturing Co. Ltd and XXXLutz Marken GmbH.

Operative part

The Court:

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 3 September 2010 (Case R 40/2010-1);

2.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by XXXLutz Marken GmbH;

3.

Orders Meyer Manufacturing Co. Ltd to bear its own costs.

Top