Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62010TJ0535

Rettens dom (Ottende Afdeling) af 13. juni 2012.
Organismos Kypriakis Galaktokomikis Viomichanias mod Kontoret for Harmonisering i det Indre Marked (Varemærker og Design) (KHIM).
EF-varemærker - indsigelsessag - ansøgning om EF-figurmærket GAZI Hellim - det ældre EF-ordfællesmærke HALLOUMI - relativ registreringshindring - lighed mellem tegnene - artikel 8, stk. 1, litra b), i forordning (EF) nr. 207/2009.
Sag T-535/10.

Samling af Afgørelser 2012 -00000

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2012:293





Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 June 2012 —
Organismos Kypriakis Galaktokomikis Viomichanias v OHIM —
Garmo (GAZI Hellim)

(Case T-535/10)

Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark GAZI Hellim — Prior collective Community word mark HALLOUMI — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009

Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Relative grounds for refusal — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services — Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 24, 36-40)

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 September 2010 (Case R 1497/2009-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Organismos Kypriakis Galaktokomikis Viomichanias and Garmo AG.

Operative part

The Court:

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 20 September 2010 (Case R 1497/2009-4);

2.

Orders OHIM to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

Top