Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 61988CC0344

Stanovisko generálního advokáta - Mischo - 11 ledna 1990.
Erich Wittmann GmbH & Co. KG proti Hauptzollamt Nürnberg-Fürth.
Žádost o rozhodnutí o předběžné otázce: Finanzgericht München - Německo.
Společný celní sazebník.
Věc C-344/88.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:1990:9

61988C0344

Opinion of Mr Advocate General Mischo delivered on 11 January 1990. - Erich Wittmann GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Nürnberg-Fürth. - Reference for a preliminary ruling: Finanzgericht München - Germany. - Common Customs Tariff - Ear-piercing instruments and stud earrings. - Case C-344/88.

European Court reports 1990 Page I-01505
Pub.RJ Page Pub somm


Opinion of the Advocate-General


++++

Mr Advocate General Mischo delivered his Opinion on 11 January 1990 . (*) He proposed that the Court should give the following two answers to the questions referred by the Finanzgericht Muenchen :

( 1 ) Heading 71.16 of the Common Customs Tariff must be interpreted as having included, even before the adoption of Commission Regulation No 3558/81 of 8 December 1981, shanks for earrings of the kind designated in that regulation .

( 2 ) Subheading 84.59 E II must be interpreted as including the guns designed to pierce the ear-lobe and insert the object referred to in the answer to the first question .

(*) Original language : French .

Top