This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62000CJ0453
Judgment of the Court of 13 January 2004.#Kühne & Heitz NV v Produktschap voor Pluimvee en Eieren.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven - Netherlands.#Poultrymeat - Export refunds - Failure to refer a question for a preliminary ruling - Final administrative decision - Effect of a preliminary ruling given by the Court after that decision - Legal certainty - Primacy of Community law - Principle of cooperation - Article 10 EC.#Case C-453/00.
Решение на Съда от 13 януари 2004 г.
Kühne & Heitz NV срещу Produktschap voor Pluimvee en Eieren.
Искане за преюдициално заключение: College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven - Нидерландия.
Възстановявания при износ - Член 10 ЕО.
Дело C-453/00.
Решение на Съда от 13 януари 2004 г.
Kühne & Heitz NV срещу Produktschap voor Pluimvee en Eieren.
Искане за преюдициално заключение: College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven - Нидерландия.
Възстановявания при износ - Член 10 ЕО.
Дело C-453/00.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2004:17
«(Poultrymeat – Export refunds – Failure to refer a question for a preliminary ruling – Final administrative decision – Effect of a preliminary ruling given by the Court after that decision – Legal certainty – Primacy of Community law – Principle of cooperation – Article 10 EC)»
|
||||
|
||||
(Arts 10 EC and 234(3) EC)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
13 January 2004 (1)
((Poultrymeat – Export refunds – Failure to refer a question for a preliminary ruling – Final administrative decision – Effect of a preliminary ruling given by the Court after that decision – Legal certainty – Primacy of Community law – Principle of cooperation – Article 10 EC))
In Case C-453/00, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven (Netherlands) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Kühne & Heitz NVand
Productschap voor Pluimvee en Eieren, on the interpretation of Community law and, in particular, the principle of cooperation arising from Article 10 EC,THE COURT,,
after considering the written observations submitted on behalf of:
having regard to the Report for the Hearing,
after hearing the oral observations of Kühne & Heitz NV, represented by A.J. Braakman, of the Netherlands Government, represented by H.G. Sevenster and J.G.M. van Bakel, acting as Agent, of the French Government, represented by R. Abraham and C. Isidoro, acting as Agents, of the Commission, represented by T. van Rijn, and of the EFTA Surveillance Authority, represented by B. Eiríksdóttir, at the hearing on 9 October 2002,
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 17 June 2003,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT,
in answer to the question referred to it by the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven by order of 1 November 2000, hereby rules:
Skouris |
Jann |
Timmermans |
Gulmann |
Cunha Rodrigues |
La Pergola |
Puissochet |
Schintgen |
Macken |
Colneric |
von Bahr |
|
R. Grass |
V. Skouris |
Registrar |
President |