EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2004/314/38
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 October 2004 in Case T-137/02: Pollmeier Malchow GmbH & Co. KG v Commission of the European Communities (State aid — Action for annulment — Recommendation 96/280/EC — Meaning of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs))
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 October 2004 in Case T-137/02: Pollmeier Malchow GmbH & Co. KG v Commission of the European Communities (State aid — Action for annulment — Recommendation 96/280/EC — Meaning of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs))
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 October 2004 in Case T-137/02: Pollmeier Malchow GmbH & Co. KG v Commission of the European Communities (State aid — Action for annulment — Recommendation 96/280/EC — Meaning of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs))
OB C 314, 18.12.2004, p. 15–15
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
18.12.2004 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 314/15 |
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
of 14 October 2004
in Case T-137/02: Pollmeier Malchow GmbH & Co. KG v Commission of the European Communities (1)
(State aid - Action for annulment - Recommendation 96/280/EC - Meaning of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs))
(2004/C 314/38)
Language of the case: German
In Case T-137/02: Pollmeier Malchow GmbH & Co. KG, established in Malchow (Germany), represented by S. Völcker and J. Heithecker, lawyers, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: V. Kreuschitz and V. Di Bucci, and M. Núñez-Müller) — action for annulment of Commission Decision 2002/821/EC of 15 January 2002 on the State aid implemented by Germany for Pollmeier GmbH, Malchow (OJ 2002 L 296, p. 20) — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition), composed of H. Legal, President, V. Tiili, A.W.H. Meij, M. Vilaras and N.J. Forwood, Judges; D. Christensen, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 14 October 2004, in which it:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |