EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TN0417
Case T-417/21: Action brought on 11 July 2021 — Itinerant Show Room v EUIPO — Save the Duck (ITINERANT)
Case T-417/21: Action brought on 11 July 2021 — Itinerant Show Room v EUIPO — Save the Duck (ITINERANT)
Case T-417/21: Action brought on 11 July 2021 — Itinerant Show Room v EUIPO — Save the Duck (ITINERANT)
OJ C 357, 6.9.2021, p. 28–28
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
6.9.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 357/28 |
Action brought on 11 July 2021 — Itinerant Show Room v EUIPO — Save the Duck (ITINERANT)
(Case T-417/21)
(2021/C 357/43)
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Itinerant Show Room Srl (San Giorgio in Bosco, Italy) (represented by: E. Montelione, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Save the Duck SpA (Milan, Italy)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark ITINERANT — Application for registration No 17 946 853
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 May 2021 in Case R 1017/2020-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order EUIPO to grant European Union trade mark No 17 946 853 for Classes 18 and 25; |
|
— |
order [EUIPO] to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Incorrect exclusion of the evidence submitted before the Board of Appeal; |
|
— |
Misapplication of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
|
— |
Misinterpretation of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |