Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62019TN0607

Case T-607/19: Action brought on 5 September 2019 — Itinerant Show Room v EUIPO (FAKE DUCK)

OJ C 372, 4.11.2019, p. 34–34 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

4.11.2019   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 372/34

Action brought on 5 September 2019 — Itinerant Show Room v EUIPO (FAKE DUCK)

(Case T-607/19)

(2019/C 372/35)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Itinerant Show Room Srl (San Giorgio in Bosco, Italy) (represented by: E. Montelione, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark FAKE DUCK — Application for registration No. 17 946 879

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 July 2019 in Case R 830/2019-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the contested decision;

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

—

Failure to take into account the inherent distinctive character of the mark FAKE DUCK;

—

Failure to take into account the complexity of the mark FAKE DUCK and the picture of an egg;

—

Misapplication of the principle of equal treatment;

—

Misapplication of the principle of legality.
Top