Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#Runnebaum Invest GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Bergsteiger — Earlier Benelux word marks and EU figurative and word marks BERG — Relative ground for refusal — Article 47(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Admissibility of a request for proof of genuine use — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-736/18.

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 November 2019.
Runnebaum Invest GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Bergsteiger — Earlier Benelux word marks and EU figurative and word marks BERG — Relative ground for refusal — Article 47(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Admissibility of a request for proof of genuine use — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.
Case T-736/18.

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 November 2019.
Runnebaum Invest GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Bergsteiger — Earlier Benelux word marks and EU figurative and word marks BERG — Relative ground for refusal — Article 47(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Admissibility of a request for proof of genuine use — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.
Case T-736/18.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2019:826