EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TA0717
Case T-717/18: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — B.D v EUIPO — Philicon-97 (PHILIBON) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark PHILIBON — Earlier national figurative mark PHILICON — Relative ground for refusal — Well-known trade mark within the meaning of Article 6bis of the Paris Convention — Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Case T-717/18: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — B.D v EUIPO — Philicon-97 (PHILIBON) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark PHILIBON — Earlier national figurative mark PHILICON — Relative ground for refusal — Well-known trade mark within the meaning of Article 6bis of the Paris Convention — Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Case T-717/18: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — B.D v EUIPO — Philicon-97 (PHILIBON) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark PHILIBON — Earlier national figurative mark PHILICON — Relative ground for refusal — Well-known trade mark within the meaning of Article 6bis of the Paris Convention — Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
OJ C 255, 3.8.2020, p. 15–15
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
3.8.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 255/15 |
Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — B.D v EUIPO — Philicon-97 (PHILIBON)
(Case T-717/18) (1)
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark PHILIBON - Earlier national figurative mark PHILICON - Relative ground for refusal - Well-known trade mark within the meaning of Article 6bis of the Paris Convention - Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2020/C 255/18)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: B.D. — Boyer Developpement (Moissac, France) (represented by: É. Junca, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Lapinskaite, A. Folliard-Monguiral, H. O’Neill and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Philicon-97 AD (Plovdiv, Bulgaria) (represented by: V. Pavlov and M. Lazarov, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 October 2018 (Case R 375/2018-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Philicon 97 and B. D. — Boyer Developpement.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders B. D. — Boyer Developpement to pay the costs. |