EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62018CB0181

Case C-181/18 P: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 December 2019 — Republic of Poland v PGNiG Supply & Trading GmbH, European Commission (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Action for annulment — Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU Article 263 — Admissibility — Decision which is of neither direct nor individual concern to the appellant — Regulatory act — Absence — Article 130 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Assessment of the pleas on the substance — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to effective judicial protection and to a fair trial — Principle of audi alteram partem — Appeal manifestly inadmissible)

OJ C 68, 2.3.2020, p. 17–17 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

2.3.2020   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/17


Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 December 2019 — Republic of Poland v PGNiG Supply & Trading GmbH, European Commission

(Case C-181/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Action for annulment - Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU Article 263 - Admissibility - Decision which is of neither direct nor individual concern to the appellant - Regulatory act - Absence - Article 130 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court - Assessment of the pleas on the substance - Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Right to effective judicial protection and to a fair trial - Principle of audi alteram partem - Appeal manifestly inadmissible)

(2020/C 68/15)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Appellant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent)

Other parties to the proceedings: PGNiG Supply & Trading GmbH (represented by: M. Jeżewski, adwokat), European Commission (represented by: O. Beynet and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Intervener: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: initially by T. Henze and R. Kanitz, then by R. Kanitz, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

1.

The appeal is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible;

2.

The Republic of Poland is to bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.


(1)  OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.


Top