EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TB0413
Case T-413/17 INTP: Order of the General Court of 2 October 2018 — Karl Storz v EUIPO (3D) (Procedure — Interpretation of a judgment — EU trade mark — Withdrawal of the application for registration — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-413/17 INTP: Order of the General Court of 2 October 2018 — Karl Storz v EUIPO (3D) (Procedure — Interpretation of a judgment — EU trade mark — Withdrawal of the application for registration — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-413/17 INTP: Order of the General Court of 2 October 2018 — Karl Storz v EUIPO (3D) (Procedure — Interpretation of a judgment — EU trade mark — Withdrawal of the application for registration — No need to adjudicate)
OJ C 436, 3.12.2018, p. 50–51
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
3.12.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 436/50 |
Order of the General Court of 2 October 2018 — Karl Storz v EUIPO (3D)
(Case T-413/17 INTP) (1)
((Procedure - Interpretation of a judgment - EU trade mark - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate))
(2018/C 436/71)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Karl Storz GmbH & Co. KG (Tuttlingen, Germany) (represented by: S. Gruber and N. Siebertz, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)
Re:
Application for interpretation of the judgment of 19 June 2018, Karl Storz v EUIPO (3D) (T-413/17, not published, EU:T:2018:356).
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for interpretation. |
|
2. |
Each party shall bear its own costs. |