Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62016TN0176

Case T-176/16: Action brought on 20 April 2016 — Kofola ČeskoSlovensko v EUIPO — Mionetto (UGO)

OJ C 222, 20.6.2016, p. 25–26 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

20.6.2016   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/25

Action brought on 20 April 2016 — Kofola ČeskoSlovensko v EUIPO — Mionetto (UGO)

(Case T-176/16)

(2016/C 222/31)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Kofola ČeskoSlovensko (Ostrava, Czech Republic) (represented by: L. Lorenc, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mionetto SpA (Valdobbiadene, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘UGO’ — Application for registration No 11 541 851

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 February 2016 in Case R 2707/2014-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the contested decision;

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Plea in law

—

Infringement of Regulation No 207/2009 as amended and the rules of law relating to its application, in particular, incorrect consideration of the likelihood of confusion of the trademarks in question.
Top