EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TA0848
Case T-848/16: Judgment of the General Court of 6 December 2018 — Deichmann v EUIPO — Vans (V) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark V — Earlier international figurative marks V — Proof of the existence, validity and scope of the protection of an earlier trade mark — Rule 19(2)(a)(ii) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 7(2)(a)(ii) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625))
Case T-848/16: Judgment of the General Court of 6 December 2018 — Deichmann v EUIPO — Vans (V) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark V — Earlier international figurative marks V — Proof of the existence, validity and scope of the protection of an earlier trade mark — Rule 19(2)(a)(ii) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 7(2)(a)(ii) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625))
Case T-848/16: Judgment of the General Court of 6 December 2018 — Deichmann v EUIPO — Vans (V) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark V — Earlier international figurative marks V — Proof of the existence, validity and scope of the protection of an earlier trade mark — Rule 19(2)(a)(ii) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 7(2)(a)(ii) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625))
OJ C 72, 25.2.2019, p. 21–22
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
25.2.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 72/21 |
Judgment of the General Court of 6 December 2018 — Deichmann v EUIPO — Vans (V)
(Case T-848/16) (1)
((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark V - Earlier international figurative marks V - Proof of the existence, validity and scope of the protection of an earlier trade mark - Rule 19(2)(a)(ii) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 7(2)(a)(ii) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625)))
(2019/C 72/26)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Deichmann SE (Essen, Germany) (represented by: C. Onken, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Vans, Inc. (Cypress, California, United States) (represented by: M. Hirsch, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 September 2016 (Case R 2129/2015-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Deichmann and Vans.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 20 September 2016 (Case R 2129/2015-4); |
|
2. |
Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs as well as those incurred by Deichmann SE; |
|
3. |
Orders Vans, Inc. to bear its own costs. |