EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TA0104
Case T-104/15: Judgment of the General Court of 20 June 2018 — KV v Commission (Grant agreements concluded in the context of the Lifelong Learning Programme (2007-2013) — ‘Green Business is Smart Business’ and ‘LadybizIT: Woman entrepreneurship on the verge of ICT’ projects — Ineligible costs — Action for annulment — Lack of jurisdiction of the Commission)
Case T-104/15: Judgment of the General Court of 20 June 2018 — KV v Commission (Grant agreements concluded in the context of the Lifelong Learning Programme (2007-2013) — ‘Green Business is Smart Business’ and ‘LadybizIT: Woman entrepreneurship on the verge of ICT’ projects — Ineligible costs — Action for annulment — Lack of jurisdiction of the Commission)
Case T-104/15: Judgment of the General Court of 20 June 2018 — KV v Commission (Grant agreements concluded in the context of the Lifelong Learning Programme (2007-2013) — ‘Green Business is Smart Business’ and ‘LadybizIT: Woman entrepreneurship on the verge of ICT’ projects — Ineligible costs — Action for annulment — Lack of jurisdiction of the Commission)
OJ C 276, 6.8.2018, p. 36–37
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
Case T-104/15: Judgment of the General Court of 20 June 2018 — KV v Commission (Grant agreements concluded in the context of the Lifelong Learning Programme (2007-2013) — ‘Green Business is Smart Business’ and ‘LadybizIT: Woman entrepreneurship on the verge of ICT’ projects — Ineligible costs — Action for annulment — Lack of jurisdiction of the Commission)
Judgment of the General Court of 20 June 2018 — KV v Commission
(Case T-104/15) ( 1 )
‛(Grant agreements concluded in the context of the Lifelong Learning Programme (2007-2013) — ‘Green Business is Smart Business’ and ‘LadybizIT: Woman entrepreneurship on the verge of ICT’ projects — Ineligible costs — Action for annulment — Lack of jurisdiction of the Commission)’
2018/C 276/62Language of the case: EnglishParties
Applicant: KV (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: C. Gheorghiu and K. Skelly, and subsequently by C. Gheorghiu, I. Rubene and J. King, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) (represented initially by: H. Monet and D. Homann, and subsequently by H. Monet, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking the annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2014) 9706 final of 16 December 2014, which dismissed as unfounded the appeal brought by the applicant against the decision of the EACEA of 23 September 2014 declaring certain staff costs to be ineligible in the light of the grant agreements concluded on 30 September 2010 and 9 September 2011 between the applicant and the EACEA for the implementation of the European projects ‘Green Business is Smart Business’ and ‘LadybizIT: Woman entrepreneurship on the Verge of ICT’.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Annuls Commission Implementing Decision C(2014) 9706 final of 16 December 2014; |
|
2. |
Dismisses the remainder of the action as inadmissible; |
|
3. |
Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by KV; |
|
4. |
Orders the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) to bear its own costs. |
( 1 ) OJ C 155, 11.5.2015.