Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62009TO0087

Order of the Court of First Instance (Eighth Chamber) of 25 November 2009.
Jørgen Andersen v Commission of the European Communities.
State aid - Measures in favour of Danske Statsbaner - Public service obligations - Decision to initiate the procedure provided for in Article 88(2) EC - Inadmissibility.
Case T-87/09.

European Court Reports 2009 II-00225*

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2009:468





Order of the Court of First Instance (Eighth Chamber) of 25 November 2009 – Andersen v Commission

(Case T-87/09)

State aid – Measures in favour of Danske Statsbaner – Public service obligations – Decision to initiate the procedure provided for in Article 88(2) EC – Inadmissibility

1.                     Actions for annulment – Actionable measures – Meaning – Measures producing binding legal effects – Preparatory measures – Not included (Art. 230 EC) (see paras 50-55)

2.                     Actions for annulment – Actionable measures – Measures producing binding legal effects – Decision to open a formal investigation procedure classifying a transport service as a public service – Legal effects independent of the final decision – None (Arts 88(2) EC and 230 EC; Council Regulation No 659/1999, Arts 4(4) and 6(1)) (see paras 56-61)

Re:

ACTION for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 4776 final of 10 September 2008 to initiate the procedure provided for in Article 88(2) EC in respect of State aid C 41/2008 (ex NN 35/2008), implemented by the Kingdom of Denmark in favour of Danske Statsbaner.

Operative part

1.

The application is dismissed as inadmissible.

2.

Mr Jørgen Andersen is ordered to pay the costs.

Top