EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 52019DC0638

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION ON THE WORKING OF COMMITTEES DURING 2018

COM/2019/638 final

Brussels, 16.12.2019

COM(2019) 638 final

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION

ON THE WORKING OF COMMITTEES DURING 2018

{SWD(2019) 441 final}


REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION

ON THE WORKING OF COMMITTEES DURING 2018

In accordance with Article 10(2) of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers 1 (the ‘Comitology Regulation’), the Commission hereby presents the annual report on the working of committees for 2018.

This report gives an overview of developments in the comitology system in 2018 and a summary of the committees’ activities. It is accompanied by a staff working document containing detailed statistics on the work of the individual committees.

1.Overview of developments in the comitology system in 2018

1.1.General development

As described in the 2013 annnual report 2 , all comitology procedures provided for in the ‘old’ Comitology Decision 3 , with the exception of the regulatory procedure with scrutiny, were automatically adapted to the new comitology procedures provided for in the Comitology Regulation.

In 2018, the comitology committees were therefore operating under the procedures set out in the Comitology Regulation, i.e. advisory (Article 4) and examination (Article 5), as well as under the regulatory procedure with scrutiny set out in Article 5a of the Comitology Decision.

The Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016 4 recalls, in its point 27, the need to align the regulatory procedure with scrutiny:

‘The three institutions acknowledge the need for the alignment of all existing legislation to the legal framework introduced by the Lisbon Treaty, and in particular the need to give high priority to the prompt alignment of all basic acts which still refer to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny. The Commission will propose that latter alignment by the end of 2016.’

In line with this commitment, the Commission adopted a proposal for the alignment of the basic acts providing for the regulatory procedure with scrutiny to delegated and implementing acts 5 . It also adopted a second proposal, dealing specifically with the alignment of basic acts in the field of justice 6 . The interinstitutional negotiations on the first file have been partially concluded. The legislator agreed to the alignment of 64 of the basic acts concerned 7 , while negotiations on the remaining acts and on the acts in the area of justice will continue. Where alignment takes place from the regulatory procedure with scrutiny to delegated acts the respective committees will no longer play a role and the respective delegated acts will in the future be prepared with the help of expert groups.

The Commission on 26 February 2016 adopted a Report on the implementation of Regulation (EU) 182/2011 8 . In this report, the Commission concluded that the overall legal framework for comitology is functioning well. However, it also pointed at the time to the political problem of ‘no opinion’ outcomes especially in a few very sensitive areas such as the authorisation of genetically modified organisms. Subsequently, the Commission on 14 February 2017 adopted a proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending the Comitology Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 9 . This proposal puts forward a number of targeted changes to the functioning of the appeal committee to address no opinion situations in sensitive areas. This file, however, is currently blocked in interinstitutional negotiations.

Negotiations between the three institutions have been concluded on non-binding criteria for the application of Articles 290 and 291 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, so the delineation between delegated and implementing acts. The final text of the delineation criteria has been published in the Official Journal on 3 July 2019 10 .

In its Communication ‘Better regulation for better results’ of May 2015, the Commission committed that draft texts for delegated acts and drafts for important implementing acts will be made public for a four weeks feedback period, allowing stakeholders to submit comments. In 2018, 165 such draft acts were published for public feedback on the Commission’s ‘Have your say’ website 11 .

1.2.Development of case law

In its judgment of 13 December 2018 in Joined Cases T‑339/16, T‑352/16 et T‑391/16, the General Court dealt with the question of essential elements of the basic act. The Court analysed whether limits on car emissions values were considered an essential element of the basic act which the Commission was not empowered to amend, even though those limits were laid down in an annex to the basic act. In the particular case at hand, the General Court looked into the recitals and enacting terms of the basis act and found that the emission limits laid down in an annex to the basic act were an essential, and ‘even a central element of the act’, because the purpose of all the other provisions of that act was to ensure respect of those limits, and there was no explicit provision empowering the Commission to amend them.

2.Overview of activities

2.1.Number of committees and meetings

It is important to distinguish between the comitology committees on the one hand, and other entities, in particular ‘expert groups’ created by the Commission itself, on the other. The latter provide expertise to the Commission 12 in preparing and implementing policy as well as delegated acts, whereas comitology committees assist the Commission in the exercise of the implementing powers that have been conferred upon it by basic legal acts. This report focuses exclusively on comitology committees. The number of active comitology committees in the period 1 January to 31 December 2018 was calculated by sector of activity (see Table I). The figures for the previous year (on 31 December 2017) are also given for purposes of comparison. Sections and configurations are not counted separately as these belong to a parent committee.

TABLE I — Total number of committees

Policy sector

2017

2018

AGRI (Agriculture and Rural Development

12

11

BUDG (Budget)

2

2

CLIMA (Climate Action)

5

5

CNECT (Communications Networks, Content and Technology)

7

7

DEVCO (International Cooperation and Development)

5

5

DIGIT (Informatics)

1

1

EAC (Education and Culture)

2

2

ECFIN (Economic and Financial Affairs)

1

1

ECHO (Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection)

2

2

EMPL (Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion)

5

5

ENER (Energy)

13

13

ENV (Environment)

30

30

ESTAT (Eurostat)

4

4

FISMA (Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital markets Union)

8

8

FPI (Service for Foreign Policy Instruments)

4

4

GROW (Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs)

42

44

HOME (Migration and Home Affairs)

13

13

JUST (Justice and Consumers)

23

25

MARE (Maritime Affairs and Fisheries)

3

3

MOVE (Mobility and Transport)

31

31

NEAR (Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations)

3

3

OLAF (European Anti-Fraud Office)

1

1

REGIO (Regional and Urban Policy)

1

1

RTD (Research and Innovation)

5

7

SANTE (Health and Food Safety)

17

17

SG (Secretariat-General)

3*

3*

TAXUD (Taxation and Customs Union)

11

13

TRADE (Trade)

13

14

TOTAL:

267

275

* Including the appeal committee (for the needs of the comitology register, the appeal committee is registered as a committee under the responsibility of the Secretariat-General; in practice, it is managed by all services concerned).

In 2018, the comitology committees could generally be broken down according to the type of procedure under which they operated (advisory procedure, examination procedure, regulatory procedure with scrutiny — see Table II). Certain committees which applied multiple procedures have been separated from committees operating under a single procedure.

TABLE II — Number of committees by procedure

 

Type of procedure

Advisory

Examination

Regulatory with scrutiny

Operates under several procedures

TOTAL:

AGRI

0

6

0

5

11

BUDG

0

1

0

1

2

CLIMA

0

1

0

4

5

CNECT

0

3

0

4

7

DEVCO

0

2

0

3

5

DIGIT

0

0

0

1

1

EAC

0

1

0

1

2

ECFIN

0

0

0

1

1

ECHO

0

1

0

1

2

EMPL

0

0

0

5

5

ENER

3

5

2

3

13

ENV

0

9

5

16

30

ESTAT

0

2

0

2

4

FISMA

0

1

2

5

8

FPI

0

3

0

1

4

GROW

3

11

4

26

44

HOME

2

7

0

3

12

JUST

7

7

4

7

25

MARE

0

1

0

2

3

MOVE

3

8

4

16

31

NEAR

1

1

0

1

3

OLAF

0

1

0

0

1

REGIO

0

0

0

1

1

RTD

0

6

0

1

7

SANTE

0

7

0

10

17

SG

0

2

0

1

3*

TAXUD

1

10

0

2

13

TRADE

3

4

0

7

14

TOTAL:

23

100

21

130

274

* Including the appeal committee.

The number of committees is not the only indicator of activity at comitology level. The number of meetings held, as well as the number of written procedures 13 used in 2018, also reflects the intensity of work in general, both at sector level and in individual committees (Table III).



TABLE III — Number of meetings and written procedures

Number of committees

Meetings

Written procedures

2017

2018

2017

2018

AGRI

90

95

17

16

BUDG

4

4

0

1

CLIMA

7

5

2

6

CNECT

17

15

11

12

DEVCO

17

18

9

16

DIGIT

1

2

0

0

EAC

6

6

1

1

ECFIN

3

2

0

0

ECHO

4

4

3

4

EMPL

6

4

1

1

ENER

6

11

5

6

ENV

29

30

13

12

ESTAT

6

5

2

3

FISMA

10

3

18

16

FPI

2

6

0

3

GROW

70

64

34

16

HOME

28

39

29

22

JUST

10

10

5

7

MARE

4

4

10

11

MOVE

54

53

35

31

NEAR

8

9

19

7

OLAF

0

0

0

0

REGIO

1

2

2

0

RTD

57

53

246

218

SANTE

108

100

494

430

SG

8*

6*

1*

0

TAXUD

33

36

29

21

TRADE

27

29

38

24

TOTAL:

616

620

1 024

880

* meetings/written procedure of the appeal committee

2.2.Number of opinions and implementing acts/ measures

As always, this report provides overall figures on the formal opinions delivered by the committees and the subsequent implementing acts/measures adopted by the Commission 14 . These figures quantify the tangible ‘output’ of the committees (see Table IV).

The European Parliament and the Council have a right of scrutiny under Article 11 of the Comitology Regulation. In 2018, the European Parliament adopted 9 resolutions on the basis of Article 11 of the Comitology Regulation, while the Council has not adopted any such resolution.

TABLE IV — Number of opinions and implementing acts/measures adopted

 

Opinions 15

Implementing Acts
adopted

Regulatory procedure with scrutiny - measures
adopted

2017

2018

2017

2018

2017

2018

AGRI

142

146

137

145

0

5

BUDG

7

4

5

6

0

0

CLIMA

11

14

3

14

4

1

CNECT

19

19

18

15

0

0

DEVCO

53

67

54

66

0

0

DIGIT

1

1

1

1

0

0

EAC

5

6

4

6

0

0

ECFIN

3

2

3

2

0

0

ECHO

7

6

6

7

0

0

EMPL

7

4

5

5

1

0

ENER

8

7

7

4

0

0

ENV

31

31

16

14

18

11

ESTAT

9

9

4

8

6

3

FISMA

22

18

7

5

0

6

FPI

4

5

2

5

0

0

GROW

104

77

83

53

24

15

HOME

76

74

68

61

0

0

JUST

10

10

6

8

0

0

MARE

20

17

17

15

0

0

MOVE

59

61

50

57

4

11

NEAR

74

86

74

86

0

0

OLAF

0

0

0

0

0

0

REGIO

2

4

0

2

0

0

RTD

248

225

176

159

0

0

SANTE

803

629

753

603

56

38

SG*

16

12

17

11

0

0

TAXUD

79

56

85

57

0

0

TRADE

86

59

86

52

0

0

TOTAL:

1906

1633

1687

1456

113

90

* Including opinions delivered by the appeal committee and adopted acts.    

2.3.Meetings of the appeal committee

The appeal committee met 6 times during 2018, and discussed 12 draft implementing acts (in the areas of health and consumer policy) which were referred by the Commission. The appeal committee delivered no opinion in all 12 cases. The Commission decided to adopt 11 implementing acts following such no opinion in 2018.

2.4.Use of the regulatory procedure with scrutiny

As mentioned under Section 1, the regulatory procedure with scrutiny has not been affected by the comitology reform of 2011. This procedure can no longer be used in new legislation, but it still appears in many existing basic acts and will continue to apply under those acts until they are aligned. In 2018, 90 measures were adopted according to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny (see Table V). The right to oppose was used once, by the European Parliament. In 2017, by comparison, the right to oppose was also used once.

TABLE V — Number of measures adopted according to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny

 

Regulatory procedure with scrutiny - measures
adopted

European Parliament opposed adoption of draft measures

Council opposed adoption of draft measures

AGRI

5

0

0

BUDG

0

0

0

CLIMA

1

0

0

CNECT

0

0

0

DEVCO

0

0

0

DIGIT

0

0

0

EAC

0

0

0

ECFIN

0

0

0

ECHO

0

0

0

EMPL

0

0

0

ENER

0

0

0

ENV

11

0

0

ESTAT

3

0

0

FISMA

6

0

0

FPI

0

0

0

GROW

15

0

0

HOME

0

0

0

JUST

0

0

0

MARE

0

0

0

MOVE

11

0

0

NEAR

0

0

0

OLAF

0

0

0

REGIO

0

0

0

RTD

0

0

0

SANTE

38

1

0

SG

0

0

0

TAXUD

0

0

0

TRADE

0

0

0

TOTAL:

90

1

0

3.Detailed information on the activities of the committees

The working document accompanying this report provides detailed information about the work of the individual committees in 2018, broken down on the basis of the different Commission departments concerned.

4.Conclusion

The European Parliament and the Council are invited to take note of this Report.

(1)    Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13).
(2)    Report from the Commission on the working of committees during 2013 (COM(2014)572 final).
(3)    Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission (OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23), as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC (OJ L 200, 22.7.2006, p. 11) (Consolidated version in OJ C 255, 21.10.2006, p. 4).
(4)    Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016 (OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1).
(5)    Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council adapting a number of legal acts providing for the use of the regulatory procedure with scrutiny to Articles 290 and 291 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (COM(2016)799).
(6)    Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council adapting a number of legal acts in the area of Justice providing for the use of the regulatory procedure with scrutiny to Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (COM(2016)798).
(7)    Regulation (EU) 2019/1243 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 adapting a number of legal acts providing for the use of the regulatory procedure with scrutiny to Articles 290 and 291 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ L 198, 25.7.2019, p. 241).
(8)      Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of Regulation (EU) 182/2011 (COM(2016)92).
(9)      Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers (COM(2017)085 final).
(10)      Interinstitutional Agreement on the Non-Binding Criteria for the application of Articles 290 and 291 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ C 223, 3.7.2019, p. 1).
(11)       https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say_en  
(12)    For more details see: http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regexpert/index.cfm .
(13)    The committee voting can take place in a regular committee meeting or, in duly justified cases, by written procedure, in accordance with Article 3(5) of the Comitology Regulation.
(14)    It is to be noted that there can be discrepancies between the number of opinions and the number of implementing acts/measures in any given year. The reasons for these are explained in the introduction to the accompanying staff working document.
(15)      A vote resulting in ‘no opinion’ is counted towards the total number of opinions.
Top