EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 32011D0202
2011/202/EU: Council Decision of 28 February 2011 on the conclusion of a Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of the Congo on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber and derived products to the European Union (FLEGT)
2011/202/EU: Council Decision of 28 February 2011 on the conclusion of a Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of the Congo on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber and derived products to the European Union (FLEGT)
2011/202/EU: Council Decision of 28 February 2011 on the conclusion of a Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of the Congo on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber and derived products to the European Union (FLEGT)
OJ L 92, 6.4.2011, p. 126–126
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
Special edition in Croatian: Chapter 15 Volume 026 P. 209 - 209
In force
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2011/202/oj
|
6.4.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 92/126 |
COUNCIL DECISION
of 28 February 2011
on the conclusion of a Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of the Congo on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber and derived products to the European Union (FLEGT)
(2011/202/EU)
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 207(3) and the first subparagraph of Article 207(4), in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a)(v) and (7) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
Having regard to the consent of the European Parliament,
Whereas:
|
(1) |
In May 2003 the European Commission published an EU Action Plan for forest law enforcement governance and trade (FLEGT) which called for measures to address illegal logging through the development of voluntary partnership agreements with timber-producing countries. Council conclusions on this Action Plan were adopted in October 2003 (1) and Parliament adopted a resolution on 11 July 2005 (2). |
|
(2) |
In accordance with Council Decision 2010/615/EU (3), the Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of the Congo on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber and derived products to the European Union (hereinafter ‘the Agreement’) was signed on 17 May 2010, subject to its conclusion at a later date. |
|
(3) |
The Agreement should be concluded, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
The Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Congo on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber and derived products to the European Union (FLEGT) is hereby approved on behalf of the Union.
The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision.
Article 2
The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person empowered on behalf of the Union to make the notification provided for in Article 28 of the Agreement, in order to bind the Union.
Article 3
The Union shall be represented by representatives of the Commission in the Joint Agreement Implementation Committee set up in accordance with Article 19 of the Agreement.
The Member States may participate in meetings of the Joint Agreement Implementation Committee as members of the Union delegation.
Article 4
For the purpose of amending the Annexes to the Agreement on the basis of Article 26 thereof, the Commission is authorised, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 11(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2173/2005 of 20 December 2005 on the establishment of a FLEGT licensing scheme for imports of timber into the European Community (4), to approve such amendments on the Union’s behalf.
Article 5
This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.
Done at Brussels, 28 February 2011.
For the Council
The President
FELLEGI T.
(1) OJ C 268, 7.11.2003, p. 1.
(2) OJ C 157 E, 6.7.2006, p. 482.
VOLUNTARY PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
between the European Union and the Republic of the Congo on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber and derived products to the European Union (FLEGT)
THE EUROPEAN UNION, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Union’,
and
THE REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO, hereinafter referred to as ‘Congo’,
hereinafter referred to together as ‘the Parties’,
IN VIEW OF the close working relationship between the Union and Congo, particularly in the context of the Partnership Agreement between Members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States, of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part, signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000 (1), revised in Luxembourg on 25 June 2005, hereinafter referred to as the ‘Cotonou Agreement’,
CONSIDERING the communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on an EU Action Plan for Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) (2) is a first step towards tackling the urgent issue of illegal logging and associated trade,
REFERRING to the Yaoundé Ministerial Declaration on Forest Law Enforcement and Governance in Africa of 16 October 2003,
AWARE of the importance of the principles set out in the Convention on Biological Diversity signed in June 1992 in Rio de Janeiro, and in the 1992 Rio de Janeiro Declaration in the context of securing sustainable forest management, and in particular of Principle 10 concerning the importance of public awareness and participation in environmental issues and of Principle 22 concerning the vital role of indigenous peoples and communities and other local communities in environmental management and development, and of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples of 13 September 2007,
REFERRING to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna (CITES) and in particular the requirement that CITES export permits issued by the Parties for specimens of species listed in Annex I, II or III be granted only under certain conditions, including that such specimens were not obtained in contravention of the laws of that State for the protection of fauna and flora,
CONSIDERING the importance attached by the Parties to development objectives agreed at international level and to the Millennium Development Goals of the United Nations,
CONSIDERING the importance attached by the Parties to the principles and rules which govern multilateral trading systems, in particular the rights and obligations in GATT 1994 and in other multilateral agreements establishing the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and to the need to apply them in a transparent and non-discriminatory manner,
REFERRING to Council Regulation (EC) No 2173/2005 of 20 December 2005 on the establishment of a FLEGT licensing scheme for imports of timber into the European Community (3),
CONSIDERING that the Congolese system for verifying the legality of timber and derived products applies to all exports and not just those intended for the Union,
CONSIDERING Congo’s desire to work towards the sustainable management of forest resources pursuant to international agreements and treaties, in particular the Treaty of 5 February 2005 on the conservation and sustainable management of forest ecosystems establishing the Central Africa Forests Commission, to the constitutional provisions of 20 January 2002 and to Law 16-2000 of 20 November 2000 setting out the forestry code,
HEREBY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
Article 1
Objective
The objective of this Agreement, consistent with the Parties’ common commitment to the sustainable management of all types of forest, is to provide a legal framework aimed at ensuring that all timber and derived products covered by this Agreement that are imported into the Union from Congo have been legally produced and in doing so to promote trade in this timber and these derived products.
In addition, this Agreement provides a basis for dialogue and cooperation between the Parties to facilitate and promote the full implementation of this Agreement and enhance forest law enforcement and governance.
Article 2
Definitions
For the purposes of this Agreement, the following definitions shall apply:
|
(a) |
‘Import into the Union’ means the release for free circulation of timber and derived products into the Union within the meaning of Article 79 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (4) and which cannot be qualified as ‘goods of a non-commercial nature’ as defined in point 6 of Article 1 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (5); |
|
(b) |
‘Export’ means the physical leaving or taking out of timber and derived products from any part of the geographical territory of Congo, except for timber and derived products in transit through Congolese territory under the control of the customs authorities of Congo; |
|
(c) |
‘Timber and derived products’ means the products listed in Annex I; |
|
(d) |
‘HS nomenclature’ means a six digit code as set out in the Harmonised Commodity Description and Coding System established by the International Convention on the Harmonised Commodity Description and Coding System of the World Customs Organisation; |
|
(e) |
‘FLEGT licence’ means a licence which refers to a shipment of legally produced timber or derived products; |
|
(f) |
‘Licensing authority’ means the authority designated to issue and validate FLEGT licences; |
|
(g) |
‘Competent authorities’ means the authorities designated by the Member States of the Union to receive, accept and verify FLEGT licences; |
|
(h) |
‘Shipment’ means a quantity of timber and derived products covered by a FLEGT licence that is sent by a consignor or a shipper and is presented for release for free circulation at a customs office in the Union; |
|
(i) |
‘Legally produced timber’ is deemed to be any timber from acquisition, production and marketing processes that meets all of the statutory and regulatory provisions in force in Congo applicable to forest management and logging as set out in Annex II. |
Article 3
FLEGT licensing scheme
1. A ‘Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade licensing scheme’ (hereinafter referred to as ‘FLEGT licensing scheme’) is hereby established between the Parties to this Agreement. It establishes a set of procedures and requirements aimed at verifying and attesting, by means of FLEGT licences, that timber and derived products shipped to the Union were legally produced. In accordance with Regulation (EC) No 2173/2005, the Union shall only accept such shipments from Congo for import into the Union if they are covered by FLEGT licences.
2. The FLEGT licensing scheme shall apply to the timber and derived products listed in Annex I.
Article 4
Licensing authority
1. Congo shall designate the licensing authority and notify contact details of the licensing authority to the European Commission. Both Parties shall make this information available to the public.
2. The licensing authority will verify that timber and derived products have been legally produced in accordance with the legislation identified in Annex II. According to the terms set out in Annex III, it will issue FLEGT licences covering shipments of timber and derived products that have been legally produced, acquired or imported in Congo and are for export to the Union and any documentation required for timber and derived products in transit through Congolese territory under the control of the customs authorities of Congo.
3. The licensing authority shall not issue FLEGT licences for any timber and derived products that are composed of, or include, timber and derived products imported into Congo from a third country unless it has been proven that this timber and these derived products, imported in accordance with the terms specified in Annex III, have been produced and exported pursuant to the laws of the third country concerned.
4. The licensing authority shall maintain and make publicly available its procedures for issuing FLEGT licences. The licensing authority shall also maintain records of all shipments covered by FLEGT licences and, consistent with national legislation concerning data protection, shall make these records available for the purposes of an independent audit, while respecting the confidentiality of information regarding exporters’ industrial property.
Article 5
Competent authorities of the Union
1. The European Commission shall inform Congo of the contact details of the competent authorities designated by the Member States of the Union.
2. The competent authorities shall verify that each shipment is the subject of a valid FLEGT licence prior to releasing that shipment for free circulation in the Union. The release for free circulation of the shipment may be suspended and the shipment detained where there are doubts regarding the validity of the FLEGT licence. The procedures governing release for free circulation in the Union for shipments covered by a FLEGT licence are described in Annex IV.
3. The competent authorities shall maintain and publish annually a record of FLEGT licences received.
4. According to national legislation on data protection, the competent authorities shall grant persons and bodies designated by Congo as Independent Auditor access to the relevant documents and data.
5. The competent authorities of the Union shall refrain from the action described in Article 5(2) for timber and derived products produced from species listed under the Appendices of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) to the extent that these are covered by the provisions for verification set out in Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 of 9 December 1996 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein (6). The FLEGT licence scheme shall nonetheless provide assurance of the legal harvesting of these products.
Article 6
FLEGT licences
1. FLEGT licences shall be issued by the licensing authority as a means of attesting that timber and derived products have been legally produced.
2. FLEGT licences shall be laid out on a French form.
3. The Parties may, by agreement, establish an electronic system for the issuing, transmission and receipt of FLEGT licences.
4. The procedure for issuing FLEGT licences and the technical specifications are set out in Annex V.
Article 7
Legality matrices
For the purposes of this Agreement, documentation including criteria and indicators that shall serve as proof of compliance with such regulations, called legality matrices, is given in Annex II.
Article 8
Verifying the legality of timber
1. Congo shall implement a system for verifying that timber and derived products for shipment have been legally produced and that only shipments verified as such are exported to the Union. The verification system should include checks of compliance in order to provide assurance that the timber and derived products destined for export to the Union have been legally produced and that FLEGT licences are not issued in respect of shipments of timber and derived products that have not been legally produced or are of unknown origin. The system shall also include procedures to ensure that timber of illegal or unknown origin does not enter the supply chain.
2. The system for verification that shipments of timber and derived products have been legally produced is set out in Annex III.
Article 9
Application of the system for verifying the legality of all timber and derived products produced in Congo
Congo shall use the system for verifying the legality of timber and derived products in respect of all timber and derived products irrespective of the intended market.
Article 10
Consultation on the validity of licences
1. If any doubt arises as to the validity of a licence, the competent authority concerned may ask the licensing authority for additional information. If no answer is received from the licensing authority within 21 calendar days, the competent authority shall act in accordance with applicable national legislation and shall not accept the licence. If, following the provision of additional information, it is established that information on the licence does not correspond to the shipment, the competent authority shall act in accordance with applicable national legislation and shall not accept the licence.
2. Where persistent disagreements or difficulties arise in consultations concerning FLEGT licences, the matter may be referred to the Joint Implementation Committee of the Agreement.
Article 11
Independent auditor
1. The Parties shall agree on the need to call on the services of an independent auditor at agreed intervals to check the performance and efficiency of the FLEGT licensing scheme as set out in Annex VI.
2. The independent auditor shall submit its observations to the Parties in reports in accordance with the procedure described in Annex VI.
3. The Parties shall facilitate the work of the independent auditor, including by ensuring that the latter has access to information as required in territories of both Parties in order to carry out its functions. However, the Parties, in accordance with the respective legislation on data protection, can keep any information that they are not allowed to disclose.
Article 12
Irregularities
The Parties shall inform each other if they suspect or have found evidence of any circumvention of, or irregularities conflicting with, the FLEGT licensing scheme, including in relation to the following:
|
(a) |
circumvention of trade, including by re-direction of trade from Congo to the Union via a third country where there is reason to believe that this has been done with the intention of avoiding applying for a licence; |
|
(b) |
FLEGT licences being issued for timber and derived products that include imports of suspicious origin from third countries; or |
|
(c) |
fraud in obtaining or using FLEGT licences. |
Article 13
Date of introduction of the FLEGT licensing scheme
1. The Parties shall notify each other through the Joint Implementation Committee of the Agreement when they consider they have made all the necessary preparations for the FLEGT licensing scheme to become fully operational.
2. The Parties, through the Joint Implementation Committee of the Agreement, shall commission an independent assessment of the FLEGT licensing scheme using the criteria set out in Annex VII. The assessment will determine whether the legality assurance system underpinning the FLEGT licensing scheme as described in Annex III adequately fulfils its functions and whether the procedures for receiving, verifying and accepting FLEGT licences, as set out in Article 5 and Annex IV, are in place in the Union.
3. On the basis of the recommendations of the Joint Implementation Committee of the Agreement, the two Parties shall agree on a date from which the FLEGT licensing scheme should start full operation.
Article 14
Schedule for implementation of the Agreement
1. The Parties hereby agree to the implementation schedule set out in Annex VIII.
2. The Parties, working through the Joint Implementation Committee of the Agreement, shall evaluate progress in implementation with reference to the schedule set out in Annex VIII.
Article 15
Other relevant measures
1. The Parties hereby agree on the following as other relevant measures set out in Annex IX of this Agreement:
|
(a) |
increasing the capacity of the General Forest Economy Inspectorate; |
|
(b) |
increasing the capacity of civil society; |
|
(c) |
legislation and regulations to be supplemented; |
|
(d) |
implementing a communication plan; |
|
(e) |
setting up a technical office for the Congolese party responsible for monitoring the Agreement. |
2. The Parties have identified the areas set out in Annex IX as those in which there is a need for additional technical and financial resources in order to implement this Agreement.
3. The provision of such additional resources shall be subject to the normal procedures for programming aid to Congo in the Union and the Member States of the Union as well as the budgetary procedures of Congo itself.
4. The Parties shall consider the need for a joint arrangement by which financing and technical contributions of the European Commission and the Member States of the Union are coordinated to support these processes.
5. Congo shall ensure that strengthening its capacity to implement this Agreement is included in national planning instruments, such as poverty reduction strategies.
6. The Parties shall ensure that activities carried out under this Agreement are coordinated with relevant existing and future development programmes and initiatives.
7. The provision of such resources is subject to the procedures governing Union aid as set out in the Cotonou Agreement and those governing bilateral aid given to Congo by Member States of the Union.
Article 16
Stakeholder involvement in the implementation of the Agreement
1. Congo shall involve the stakeholders in the implementation of this Agreement in accordance with the international and subregional commitments it has signed up to, in particular the Convention on Biological Diversity of June 1992 and the Treaty of 5 February 2005 on the conservation and sustainable management of forest ecosystems establishing the Central Africa Forests Commission.
2. The Union shall hold regular consultations with stakeholders on the implementation of this Agreement, taking into account its obligations under the 1998 Aarhus Convention on access to information, public participation in the decision-making process and access to justice in environmental matters.
Article 17
Social safeguards
1. In order to minimise any adverse impacts, the Parties hereby agree to develop a better understanding of the livelihoods of potentially affected indigenous and local communities, including those engaged in illegal logging.
2. The Parties shall monitor the impact of this Agreement on those communities, while taking reasonable steps to mitigate any adverse effects. The Parties may agree on additional measures to address such adverse effects.
Article 18
Market incentives
Taking into account its international obligations, the Union shall strive to promote favourable access to its market for the timber and derived products covered by this Agreement. Such efforts shall include:
|
(a) |
the encouragement of public and private procurement policies that recognise efforts to ensure a supply of legally harvested forest produce, in particular timber and derived products; and |
|
(b) |
the promotion of FLEGT-licensed products within the Union market. |
Article 19
Joint implementation committee of the Agreement
1. The Parties shall establish a Joint Implementation Committee of the Agreement to facilitate the monitoring and review of this Agreement. It also facilitates dialogue and the exchange of information between the Parties.
2. Each Party shall name its representatives on the Joint Implementation Committee of the Agreement, which shall take its decisions by consensus.
3. The Joint Implementation Committee of the Agreement:
|
(a) |
shall meet at least twice a year on dates and at places agreed by the Parties; |
|
(b) |
shall prepare the agenda for its work and terms of reference for joint actions; |
|
(c) |
shall establish its own rules of procedure; |
|
(d) |
shall preside over its meetings by a co-chair arrangement; |
|
(e) |
shall ensure that its work is as transparent as possible and that information about its work and decisions is made available to the public; |
|
(f) |
may set up working groups or other subsidiary bodies for areas of work requiring specific expertise; |
|
(g) |
publishes an annual report. Details of the content of this report are given in Annex X. |
4. The specific functions of the Joint Implementation Committee of the Agreement are described in Annex XI.
5. In the period between the signing of the Agreement and its entry into force, a joint mechanism for dialogue and monitoring shall be set up to facilitate implementation of the Agreement.
Article 20
Communication on implementation of the Agreement
1. The representatives of the Parties responsible for official communications concerning implementation of this Agreement are:
|
For Congo |
For the European Union |
|
Minister of Sustainable Development, Forestry Economy and Environment |
Head of the Union Delegation in Congo |
2. The Parties shall provide one another with the information necessary for implementing this Agreement.
Article 21
Reporting and public disclosure
1. Public disclosure of information is one of the key provisions of this Agreement for promoting governance. Information facilitates the implementation and monitoring of the system, increasing transparency. Information also allows better provision of accounts and greater accountability of the various parties involved. The information that will be divulged and made available to the public is specified in Annex X.
2. Each Party shall consider the most appropriate mechanism (media, documents, Internet, workshops, annual reports) for publishing the information. In particular, the Parties shall endeavour to provide the various stakeholders associated with the forestry industry with reliable, relevant and up-to-date information. These mechanisms are described in Annex X.
Article 22
Confidential information
1. Each Party agrees to maintain, to the extent required under its laws, the confidentiality of confidential information exchanged under this Agreement. Neither Party shall disclose to the public, nor permit its authorities to disclose to the public, information exchanged under this Agreement that constitutes trade secrets or confidential commercial information.
2. Subject to paragraph 1, the following information shall not be considered confidential:
|
(a) |
the number of FLEGT licences issued by Congo and received by the Union and the volume of timber and derived products exported from Congo and received by the Union; |
|
(b) |
the names and addresses of licence holders and of importers. |
Article 23
Territorial application
This Agreement shall apply to the territory in which the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union is applied under the conditions laid down in that Treaty, on the one hand, and to the territory of Congo, on the other.
Article 24
Settlement of disputes
1. The Parties shall seek to resolve any dispute concerning the application or interpretation of this Agreement through early consultation.
2. If a dispute has not been settled by means of consultation within 3 months from the date of the initial request for consultation, either Party may refer the dispute to the Joint Implementation Committee of the Agreement, which shall endeavour to settle it. The Committee shall be provided with all relevant information for an in-depth examination of the situation with a view to finding an acceptable solution. To this end, the Committee shall be required to examine all possibilities enabling the effective implementation of this Agreement to be maintained.
3. In the event that the Joint Implementation Committee of the Agreement is unable to settle the dispute, the Parties may:
|
(a) |
jointly seek the good offices of, or request mediation by, a third party; |
|
(b) |
seek arbitration. If the dispute cannot be settled in accordance with paragraph 3(a), either Party may notify the other of the appointment of an arbitrator; the other Party must then appoint a second arbitrator within 30 calendar days of the appointment of the first arbitrator. The Parties shall jointly appoint a third arbitrator within two months of the appointment of the second arbitrator. The arbitrators’ decisions shall be taken by majority vote within six months of the third arbitrator being appointed. The award shall be binding on the Parties without right of appeal. |
4. The Joint Implementation Committee of the Agreement establishes the working procedures for arbitration.
Article 25
Suspension
1. Either Party may suspend the application of this Agreement. The decision on suspension and the reasons for that decision shall be notified to the other Party in writing.
2. The conditions of this Agreement shall cease to apply 30 calendar days after such notice is given.
3. Application of this Agreement shall resume 30 calendar days after the Party that has suspended its application informs the other Party that the reasons for the suspension no longer apply.
Article 26
Amendments
1. Either Party wishing to amend this Agreement shall present the proposal at least 3 months before the next meeting of the Joint Implementation Committee of the Agreement. The latter shall discuss the proposal and, if consensus is achieved, it shall make a recommendation. Each Party shall consider the recommendation and, subject to its agreement, it shall approve it in accordance with its own procedures.
2. Any amendment so approved by both Parties shall enter into force on the first day of the month following the date on which the Parties notify each other of the completion of the procedures necessary for this purpose.
3. The Joint Implementation Committee of the Agreement may adopt amendments to the annexes to this Agreement.
4. Notification of any amendment shall be sent to the joint depositaries for this Agreement.
Article 27
Annexes
The annexes to this Agreement shall form an integral part thereof.
Article 28
Entry into force
1. This Agreement shall enter into force on the first day of the month following the date on which the Parties notify each other in writing of the completion of the procedures necessary for this purpose.
2. Notification shall be sent to the Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union and to the Congo Ministry of Foreign Affairs and French-Speaking Countries, who shall be the joint depositaries for the Agreement.
Article 29
Duration and extension
This Agreement shall remain in force for a period of seven years and shall be extended for consecutive periods of five years, unless a Party renounces the extension by notifying the other Party in writing at least one year before expiry of the Agreement.
Article 30
Notice of termination of the Agreement
Notwithstanding Article 29, either Party may terminate this Agreement by notifying the other Party in writing. This Agreement shall cease to apply 12 months after the date of such notification.
Article 31
Authentic texts
This Agreement shall be drawn up in duplicate in the Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish languages, each of these texts being authentic. In case of divergence of interpretation, the French text shall prevail over the other language texts.
Съставено в Брюксел на седемнайсети май две хиляди и десета година.
Hecho en Bruselas, el diecisiete de mayo de dos mil diez.
V Bruselu dne sedmnáctého května dva tisíce deset.
Udfærdiget i Bruxelles den syttende maj to tusind og ti.
Geschehen zu Brüssel am siebzehnten Mai zweitausendzehn.
Kahe tuhande kümnenda aasta maikuu seitsmeteistkümnendal päeval Brüsselis.
Έγινε στις Βρυξέλλες, στις δέκα εφτά Μαΐου δύο χιλιάδες δέκα.
Done at Brussels on the seventeenth day of May in the year two thousand and ten.
Fait à Bruxelles, le dix-sept mai deux mille dix.
Fatto a Bruxelles, addì diciassette maggio duemiladieci.
Briselē, divi tūkstoši desmitā gada septiņpadsmitajā maijā
Priimta du tūkstančiai dešimtų metų gegužės septynioliktą dieną Briuselyje.
Kelt Brüsszelben, a kétezer-tizedik év május havának tizenhetedik napján.
Magħmul fi Brussell, fis-sbatax-il jum ta’ Mejju tas-sena elfejn u għaxra.
Gedaan te Brussel, de zeventiende mei tweeduizend tien.
Sporządzono w Brukseli dnia siedemnastego maja roku dwa tysiące dziesiątego.
Feito em Bruxelas, em dezassete de Maio de dois mil e dez.
Întocmit la Bruxelles, la șaptesprezece mai două mii zece.
V Bruseli dňa sedemnásteho mája dvetisícdesať.
V Bruslju, dne sedemnajstega maja leta dva tisoč deset.
Tehty Brysselissä seitsemäntenätoista päivänä toukokuuta vuonna kaksituhattakymmenen.
Som skedde i Bryssel den sjuttonde maj tjugohundratio.
За Европейския съюз
Por la Unión Europea
Za Evropskou unii
For Den Europæiske Union
Für die Europäische Union
Euroopa Liidu nimel
Για την Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση
For the European Union
Pour l’Union européenne
Per l’Unione europea
Eiropas Savienības vārdā –
Europos Sąjungos vardu
Az Európai Unió részéről
Għall-Unjoni Ewropea
Voor de Europese Unie
W imieniu Unii Europejskiej
Pela União Europeia
Pentru Uniunea Europeană
Za Európsku úniu
Za Evropsko unijo
Euroopan unionin puolesta
För Europeiska unionen
За Република Конго
Por la República de Congo
Za Konžskou republiku
For Republikken Congo
Für die Republik Kongo
Kongo Vabariigi nimel
Για τη Δημοκρατία του Κονγκό
For the Republic of Congo
Pour la Répubique du Congo
Per la Repubblica del Congo
Kongo Republikas vārdā
Kongo Respublikos vardu
A Kongói Köztársaság részéről
Għar-Repubblika tal-Kongo
Voor de Republiek Congo
W imieniu Republiki Konga
Pela República do Congo
Pentru Republica Congo
Za Konžskú republiku
Za Republiko Kongo
Kongon tasavallan puolesta
För republiken Kongo
(1) OJ L 317, 15.12.2000, p. 3.
(2) COM(2003) 251 final, 21.5.2003.
(3) OJ L 347, 30.12.2005, p. 1.
(4) OJ L 302, 19.10.1992, p. 38.
ANNEX I
LIST OF PRODUCTS SUBJECT TO FLEGT LICENSING
The following products are subject to FLEGT licensing:
|
HS codes |
Description of the goods |
|
4403 |
Wood in the rough, whether or not stripped of bark or sapwood, or roughly squared |
|
4406 |
Railway or tramway sleepers (cross-ties) of wood |
|
4407 |
Wood sawn or chipped lengthwise, sliced or peeled, whether or not planed, sanded or end-jointed, of a thickness exceeding 6 mm |
|
4408 |
Sheets for veneering (including those obtained by slicing laminated wood), for plywood or for other similar laminated wood and other wood sawn lengthwise, sliced or peeled, whether or not planed, sanded, spliced or end-jointed, of a thickness not exceeding 6 mm |
|
4412 |
Plywood, veneered panels and similar laminated wood |
|
44 09 |
Wood (including strips and friezes for parquet flooring, not assembled) continuously shaped (tongued, grooved, rebated, chamfered, V-jointed, beaded, moulded, rounded or the like) along any of its edges, ends or faces, whether or not planed, sanded or end-jointed |
|
44 01 10 |
Fuel wood, in logs, in billets, in twigs, in faggots or in similar forms |
|
44 01 30 |
Sawdust and wood waste and scrap, whether or not agglomerated in logs, briquettes, pellets or similar forms |
|
44 02 90 |
Wood charcoal (including shell or nut charcoal), whether or not agglomerated |
|
44 10 11 |
Particle boards |
|
44 14 00 |
Wooden frames for paintings, photographs, mirrors or similar objects |
|
44 15 10 |
Cases, boxes, crates, drums and similar packings; cable-drums of wood |
|
44 15 20 |
Pallets, box pallets and other load boards of wood; pallet collars of wood |
|
44 17 00 |
Tools, tool bodies, tool handles, broom or brush bodies and handles, of wood; boot or shoe lasts and trees of wood |
|
44 18 10 |
Builders’ joinery and carpentry of wood: windows, French-windows and their frames |
|
44 18 20 |
Builders’ joinery and carpentry of wood: doors and their frames and thresholds |
|
44 18 90 |
Builders’ joinery and carpentry of wood: parquet panels |
|
94 03 30 |
Wooden furniture of a kind used in offices |
|
94 03 40 |
Wooden furniture of a kind used in kitchens |
|
94 03 50 |
Wooden furniture of a kind used in the bedroom |
|
94 03 60 |
Other wooden furniture |
ANNEX II
LEGALITY MATRICES FOR TIMBER SOURCED FROM NATURAL FORESTS AND FOREST PLANTATIONS IN CONGO
Introduction
Annex II of the Voluntary Partnership Agreement consists of the following:
|
— |
a matrix for assessing the legality of timber produced in natural forests, |
|
— |
a matrix for assessing the legality of timber produced in forest plantations. |
These two matrices for assessing legality therefore cover all timber and derived products produced and sold in Congo (1).
Legality is defined as follows:
|
|
Any timber from acquisition, production and marketing processes that meet all of the statutory and regulatory provisions in force in Congo applicable to forest management and logging is deemed to be legal. |
|
|
The legality matrices constitute the basic document for verifying legality. |
|
|
The legality matrices have been produced as part of a participative process involving representatives of stakeholders in the sustainable management of forests, namely: the public sector, the private sector and civil society in Congo. These matrices were also tested on the ground in February 2009 in order to verify the relevance of indicators and verifiers and make improvements to them. |
|
|
Any amendment of statutory and regulatory provisions will result in a corresponding amendment of the legality matrices. Proposed amendments of this Annex, together with supporting evidence, will be submitted for approval to the Joint Implementation Committee of the Agreement in accordance with Annex XI of this Agreement. |
|
|
It should be emphasised that the management plan for each forestry concession will be adopted under a separate decree. That is why the details of these regulations cannot be given in the legality matrices. |
|
|
Besides the logging, processing and trade of timber, the legality matrices take the following into account in accordance with the definition of legality:
|
|
|
All logging rights, as defined under Articles 65 to 70 of law 16-2000, are covered by the legality matrices:
|
1. Legality matrix for timber produced in natural forests in Congo
The legality matrix for timber produced in natural forests consists of 5 principles, 23 criteria, 65 indicators and 162 verifiers.
The matrix for timber produced in natural forests includes timber produced in any logging operations:
|
— |
the exploitation of annual harvesting sites (annual harvest licence, completion licence, clearing licence), |
|
— |
logging by special permit, |
|
— |
the construction of main evacuation roads or minor roads within forestry concessions and the installation of base camps and industrial sites on the basis of an installation licence, |
|
— |
the completion of development projects relating to the construction of social and economic infrastructures (roads, hydroelectric dams, etc.). This is timber harvesting by deforestation licence. |
|
|
Reference of the legislation or regulations |
Articles |
Type of permit |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
1, 3 and 9 |
CAT, CTI, PS |
||||
|
|
18 and 40 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
172 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
18 and 40 |
CAT, CTI |
|||||
|
|
181 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
1, subparagraph 2 |
CAT, CTI |
|||||
|
|||||||
|
|
48 |
CAT, CTI, PS |
||||
|
|
48 |
CAT, CTI, PS |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
8 |
CAT, CTI, PS |
||||
|
28, 42 and 43 |
CAT, CTI, PS |
|||||
|
26 |
CAT, CTI, PS |
|||||
|
|||||||
|
|
10 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
26 |
CAT, CTI |
|||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
73 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
148 |
CAT, CTI |
|||||
|
|
164 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
165 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
65 and 66 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
77 |
PS |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
71 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
72, 74, 101 and 172 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
74, 75, 101 and 172 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
277 and 314 |
CAT, CTI, PS |
||||
|
|
112 to 119 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
48 |
CAT, CTI, PS |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
— |
— |
CAT |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
— |
CAT |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
— |
CAT |
||||
|
|
37 and 81 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
72 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
168 |
CAT, CTI |
|||||
|
|
37 and 81 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
— |
CAT |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
10 |
CAT, CTI, PS |
||||
|
|
1 and 9 |
CAT, CTI, PS |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
— |
CAT |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
— |
CAT |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
new 173 and 210-3 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
210-5 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
210-7 and new 179 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
27 |
CAT, CTI |
|||||
|
|||||||
|
|
new 179 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
7 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
26 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
182 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
13 to 16 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
75 |
CAT, CTI |
|||||
|
6 |
CAT, CTI |
|||||
|
|
172 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
172 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
90 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
90 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
9 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
new 145-1 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
22 |
CAT, CTI |
|||||
|
|
new 141-2 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
new 141-2 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
— |
CAT |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
5 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
10 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
9 and 10 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
16 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
2 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
1 and 4 |
CAT, CTI |
|||||
|
4 and 5 |
CAT, CTI |
|||||
|
|
2 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
1 and 4 |
CAT, CTI |
|||||
|
|
2 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
39 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
16, 17 and 18 |
CAT, CTI |
|||||
|
|
37 and 82 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
— |
CAT |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
142 and 143 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
12 |
CAT, CTI |
|||||
|
|
2 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
9 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
— |
CAT |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
37 and 82 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
— |
CAT |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
74 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
37 and 82 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
— |
CAT |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
5 |
CAT |
||||
|
|
5 |
CAT |
||||
|
|
55 and 56 |
CAT |
||||
|
54 |
CAT |
|||||
|
|||||||
|
|
5 |
CAT |
||||
|
|
5 |
CAT |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
5 |
CAT |
||||
|
|
8 |
CAT |
||||
|
68 |
CAT |
|||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
24 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
80, 81 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
81, 82 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
80 and 81 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
82 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
55, 56 |
CAT |
||||
|
|
24 |
CAT |
||||
|
68 |
CAT, CTI |
|||||
|
8 |
CAT, CTI |
|||||
|
|
99 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
37, 81 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
55, 56 |
CAT |
||||
|
24 |
CAT |
|||||
|
|
8 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
68 |
CAT, CTI |
|||||
|
|
72,74 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
87 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
37, 81 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
87 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
37, 81 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
87 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
121 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
81 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
81 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
82 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
87 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
90 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
130, 131 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
88 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
65, 66, 67 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
81 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
119 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
121 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
81 and 82 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
65 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
118 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
71 and 72 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
81 and 82 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
168 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
81 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
82 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
— |
CAT |
||||
|
|
— |
CAT |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
169 and 170 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
81 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
82 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
124 to 124 b |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
110 and 111 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
14 and 27 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
6 and 27 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
31, 46, 47 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
191 |
CAT, CTI |
|||||
|
137 |
CAT, CTI |
|||||
|
23 |
CAT, CTI |
|||||
|
|
179 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
87 |
CAT, CTI, PS |
||||
|
|
124 to 124 b |
CAT, CTI, PS |
||||
|
87 |
CAT, CTI, PS |
|||||
|
|||||||
|
|
132 to 135 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
461 |
CAT, CTI |
|||||
|
|
462 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
134 |
CAT, CTI |
|||||
|
|
134 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
462 and 463 |
CAT, CTI |
|||||
|
|
33 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
462 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
461, 462 and 463 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
171 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
461 to 463 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
147bis |
CAT, CTI |
|||||
|
|||||||
|
|
21, 22, 23 and 26 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
111 |
CAT, CTI, PS |
|||||
|
387(5) and 399 |
CAT, CTI |
|||||
|
308 |
CAT, CTI |
|||||
|
|
21, 22, 23 and 26 |
CAT, CTI, PS |
||||
|
463 |
CAT, CTI, PS |
|||||
|
134 |
CAT, CTI, PS |
|||||
|
327 and 328 |
CAT, CTI |
|||||
|
|
134 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
462, 463 |
CAT, CTI, PS |
|||||
|
|
CAT, CTI, PS |
|||||
|
|
461, 462 and 463 |
CAT, CTI, PS |
||||
|
134 |
CAT, CTI |
|||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
10 and 15 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
16, 17, 18, 23, 24 and 40 |
CAT, CTI |
|||||
|
|
173 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
118 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
173 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
73-3 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
2 and 3 |
CAT, CTI, PS |
||||
|
10 and 11 |
|
|||||
|
|
503 |
CAT, CTI, PS |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
5 |
CAT, CTI, PS |
||||
|
|
23 |
CAT, CTI, PS |
||||
|
|
1 to 9 |
CAT, CTI, PS |
||||
|
|
48 |
CAT, CTI, PS |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
9 |
CAT, CTI, PS |
||||
|
|
1 to 24 |
CAT, CTI, PS |
||||
|
23 |
CAT, CTI, PS |
|||||
|
|||||||
|
|
121 |
CAT, CTI, PS |
||||
|
|
1, 2, 3, 4 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
3 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
3 and 4 |
CAT, CTI |
|||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
86 |
CAT, CTI, PS |
||||
|
|
75 |
CAT, CTI, PS |
||||
|
|
81 |
CAT, CTI, PS |
||||
|
|||||||
|
|
20 and 27 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
135 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
3 and 8 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
18 and 27 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
110 and 111 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
6, 14 and 27 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
6, 14 and 27 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
|
|
27 |
CAT, CTI |
||||
2. Legality matrix for timber produced in forest plantations
The legality matrix for timber produced in plantations consists of 5 principles, 20 criteria, 56 indicators and 141 verifiers.
|
|
Reference of the legislation or regulation |
Article |
||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
1, 3 and 9 |
||||
|
|
18 and 40 |
||||
|
||||||
|
|
172 |
||||
|
|
18 and 40 |
||||
|
181 |
|||||
|
1, paragraph 2 |
|||||
|
||||||
|
|
48 |
||||
|
|
48 |
||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
8 |
||||
|
28, 42 and 43 |
|||||
|
26 |
|||||
|
||||||
|
|
10 |
||||
|
26 |
|||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
60 |
||||
|
|
24 |
||||
|
|
24 |
||||
|
||||||
|
|
102 |
||||
|
|
37 |
||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
15 |
||||
|
|
15 |
||||
|
|
17 |
||||
|
|
19 |
||||
|
|
14 |
||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
61 |
||||
|
|
62 |
||||
|
|
2 |
||||
|
92 |
|||||
|
|
102 |
||||
|
|
64 |
||||
|
||||||
|
|
65, 76 |
||||
|
178 |
|||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
277 and 314 |
||||
|
|
112 to 119 |
||||
|
|
48 |
||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
— |
||||
|
|
— |
||||
|
||||||
|
|
— |
||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
— |
||||
|
|
— |
||||
|
|
37 and 81 |
||||
|
||||||
|
|
72 |
||||
|
168 |
|||||
|
|
37 and 81 |
||||
|
|
— |
||||
|
|
— |
||||
|
||||||
|
|
10 |
||||
|
|
1 and 9 |
||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
new 173 and 210-3 |
||||
|
|
210-5 |
||||
|
|
210-7 and new 179 |
||||
|
27 |
|||||
|
||||||
|
|
new 179 |
||||
|
||||||
|
|
7 |
||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
26 |
||||
|
||||||
|
|
182 |
||||
|
|
13 to 16 |
||||
|
75 |
|||||
|
6 |
|||||
|
|
172 |
||||
|
|
172 |
||||
|
||||||
|
|
90 |
||||
|
|
90 |
||||
|
||||||
|
|
9 |
||||
|
|
new 145-1 |
||||
|
22 |
|||||
|
|
new 141-2 |
||||
|
|
new 141-2 |
||||
|
|
— |
||||
|
||||||
|
|
5 |
||||
|
|
10 |
||||
|
||||||
|
|
9 and 10 |
||||
|
|
16 |
||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
2 |
||||
|
1 and 4 |
|||||
|
4 and 5 |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
1 and 4 |
||||
|
|
2 |
||||
|
||||||
|
|
39 |
||||
|
16, 17 and 18 |
|||||
|
|
37 and 82 |
||||
|
|
— |
||||
|
||||||
|
|
142 and 143 |
||||
|
12 |
|||||
|
|
2 |
||||
|
|
9 |
||||
|
|
— |
||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
37 and 82 |
||||
|
|
— |
||||
|
||||||
|
|
74 |
||||
|
|
37 and 82 |
||||
|
|
— |
||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
5 |
||||
|
|
5 |
||||
|
|
55 and 56 |
||||
|
54 |
|||||
|
||||||
|
|
5 |
||||
|
|
5 |
||||
|
||||||
|
|
5 |
||||
|
|
8 |
||||
|
68 |
|||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
24 |
||||
|
|
37 and 82 |
||||
|
||||||
|
|
68 |
||||
|
8 |
|||||
|
|
183 |
||||
|
|
37, 81, 82 |
||||
|
||||||
|
|
— |
||||
|
|
— |
||||
|
|
— |
||||
|
||||||
|
|
121 |
||||
|
|
81 and 82 |
||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
114, 115 |
||||
|
|
81 and 82 |
||||
|
||||||
|
|
121 |
||||
|
|
119 |
||||
|
|
81 and 82 |
||||
|
||||||
|
|
118 |
||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
124 to 124 b |
||||
|
||||||
|
|
110 and 111 |
||||
|
|
6, 14 and 27 |
||||
|
49 |
|||||
|
||||||
|
|
31, 46 and 47 |
||||
|
191 |
|||||
|
137 |
|||||
|
23 |
|||||
|
|
179 |
||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
87 |
||||
|
||||||
|
|
132 to 135 |
||||
|
461 |
|||||
|
|
134 |
||||
|
462 and 463 |
|||||
|
|
134 |
||||
|
46 and 463 |
|||||
|
||||||
|
|
462 |
||||
|
|
462 |
||||
|
|
461, 462 and 463 |
||||
|
||||||
|
|
171 |
||||
|
|
461 to 463 |
||||
|
147bis |
|||||
|
||||||
|
|
21, 22, 23 and 26 |
||||
|
111 |
|||||
|
461 |
|||||
|
308 |
|||||
|
|
21, 22, 23 and 26 |
||||
|
463 |
|||||
|
134 |
|||||
|
327 and 328 |
|||||
|
|
134 |
||||
|
426 and 463 |
|||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
10 and 15 |
||||
|
16, 17, 18, 23, 24 and 40 |
|||||
|
|
173 |
||||
|
||||||
|
|
10 and 15 |
||||
|
|
73-3 |
||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
1, 2, 3 and 4 |
||||
|
|
1 to 5 |
||||
|
77 and 78 |
|||||
|
|
503 |
||||
|
||||||
|
|
5 |
||||
|
|
23 |
||||
|
|
1 to 9 |
||||
|
|
48 |
||||
|
||||||
|
|
9 |
||||
|
|
1 to 24 |
||||
|
23 |
|||||
|
||||||
|
|
121 |
||||
|
|
1, 2, 3 and 4 |
||||
|
|
3 |
||||
|
3 and 4 |
|||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
86 |
||||
|
|
75 |
||||
|
|
81 |
||||
|
||||||
|
|
20 and 27 |
||||
|
|
135 |
||||
|
|
18 and 27 |
||||
|
|
110 and 111 |
||||
|
|
14 and 27 |
||||
|
|
6 and 27 |
||||
|
|
27 |
||||
LIST OF LAWS AND PRINCIPAL SETS OF REGULATIONS AND REGIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN DETERMINING THE LEGALITY OF FORESTRY PRODUCTS
1. Forestry
|
— |
law No 16-2000 of 20 November 2000 setting out the forestry code, |
|
— |
decree No 2002-434 of 31 December 2002 relating to the organisation and functioning of the forestry fund, |
|
— |
decree No 2002-435 of 31 December 2002 relating to the powers, organisation and functioning of the national centre for the surveying and management of forestry and fauna, |
|
— |
decree No 2002-436 of 31 December 2002 relating to the powers, organisation and functioning of the inspectorate of forestry products for export, |
|
— |
decree No 2002-437 of 31 December 2002 laying down the conditions of forest management and use, |
|
— |
order No 5053/MEF/CAB of 19 June 2007 defining national directives for the sustainable management of forest concessions. |
2. Environment
|
— |
law No 003/91 of 23 April 1991 on environmental protection, |
|
— |
decree No 86/775 of 7 June 1986 making environmental impact studies compulsory, |
|
— |
order No 1450/MIME/DGE of 18 November 1999 relating to the application of certain provisions on installations classified under law No 003/91 on environmental protection, |
|
— |
order No 835/MIME/DGE of 6 September 1999 laying down the conditions of consent for the performance of environmental impact studies or assessments in the Republic of Congo. |
3. Labour, health and safety
|
— |
law No 45-75 of 15 March 1975 instituting a labour code in the Popular Republic of Congo, |
|
— |
law No 6-96 of 6 March 1996 amending and supplementing certain provisions of law No 45-75 of 15 March 1975 instituting a labour code in the Popular Republic of Congo, |
|
— |
law 004/86 of 25/02/86 instituting the social security code in the Popular Republic of Congo, |
|
— |
law No 022/88 of 17 September 1988 amending law No 001/86 of 22 February 1986 replacing and supplementing law No 03/85 of 14 February 1985 creating the National Office of Employment and Labour (ONEMO) and amending the labour code, |
|
— |
decree No 78/359/MJT.SGFPT.DTPS.ST.3/8 of 12 May 1978 ruling on the dispensation specified in Article 105 of the labour code, |
|
— |
decree No 78/360/MJT.SGFPT.DTPS.ST. 3/8 of 12 May 1978 laying down, for establishments not covered by farming regulations, working hours, overtime rules and payment terms, |
|
— |
decree No 78/361/MJT.SGFPT.DTPS.ST.3/8 of 12 May 1978 laying down, for farming companies and the like, overtime rules and payment terms, |
|
— |
order No 9028/MTERFPPS/DGT/DSSHST of 10 December 1986 relating to special health and safety measures applicable to forestry work, |
|
— |
order No 9030/MTERFPPS/DGT/DSSHST of 10 December 1986 instituting company health and safety committees, |
|
— |
order No 9033/MTERFSPPS/DGT/DSSHST of 10 December 1986 relating to the organisation and functioning of company socio-sanitary centres set up in the Popular Republic of Congo, |
|
— |
decree No 2008-942 of 31 December 2008 setting the minimum guaranteed interprofessional salary (SMIG), |
|
— |
order No 3092 of 9 July 2003 laying down the conditions for setting up and opening private sanitation establishments. |
4. Trade
|
— |
law No 6-94 of 1 June 1994 regulating prices, trading standards and the identification and suppression of fraud, |
|
— |
law No 19-2005 of 24 November 2005 regulating the trading profession in the Republic of Congo, |
|
— |
law No 3-2007 of 24 January 2007 regulating imports, exports and re-exports, |
|
— |
decree No 2008-446 of 15 November 2008 laying down the terms for obtaining a trading licence. |
5. Land management
|
— |
law No 17-2000 of 31 December 2000 relating to land ownership. |
6. Agriculture and farming
|
— |
decree No 55/1219 of 13 September 1955 relating to public authority rules laying down the conditions for applying the law of 26 November 1952 relating to the organisation of plant protection in territories under the responsibility of the Ministry for French Overseas Territories, |
|
— |
decree No 86/970 of 27 September 1986 laying down the compensation payable in the event of the destruction of fruit trees and damage to crops, |
|
— |
order 1.142 of 12 June 1945 instituting phytosanitary control in French Equatorial Africa (AEF), |
|
— |
order 1.143 of 12 June 1945 instituting monitoring and a phytosanitary policy for crops in French Equatorial Africa (AEF), |
|
— |
order No 2866/MAE/MEFB of 3 July 2008 laying down the fees for inspections, zoosanitary and phytosanitary services and regulatory sanitary documents. |
7. Transport
|
— |
law No 018/89 of 31 October 1989 defining the various road transport activities and activities connected with motor vehicle transport and laying down the fees payable for the granting of licences to carry out these professions, |
|
— |
2001 revised CEMAC community highway code, |
|
— |
CEMAC/RDC interior navigation code, |
|
— |
decree No 90/135 of 31 March 1990 regulating access to the road transport profession and the exercise of activities connected with motor vehicle transport in Republic of Congo, |
|
— |
decree No 98-39 of 29 January 1998 relating to the organisation and regulation of sea traffic from and to the Republic of Congo, |
|
— |
decree No 2003-61 of 6 May 2003 regulating the registration of motor vehicles, |
|
— |
order No 5694 of 17 September 2001 laying down the conditions required for obtaining consent to work in the road transport profession and in professions connected with motor vehicle transport, |
|
— |
order No 11599 of 15 November 2004 regulating the technical inspection of vehicles, |
|
— |
order No 2844 of 12 April 2005 laying down the conditions for drawing up and issuing motor vehicle registration documents, |
|
— |
order No 1033/MTMMM-CAB of 14 May 2008 instituting the cargo tracking document for the international transportation of goods from and to Congo. |
8. Economy
|
— |
law No 6-2003 of 18 January 2003 relating to the investment charter, |
|
— |
decree No 2004-30 of 18 February 2004 laying down the terms of consent to the benefits of the investment charter. |
9. International, regional and sub-regional agreements
|
— |
OHADA uniform act relating to general commercial law, |
|
— |
uniform act of 17 April 1997 relating to commercial law for trading companies and the economic interest group, |
|
— |
OHADA uniform act of 10 April 1998 organising summary debt collection procedures, |
|
— |
OHADA uniform act of 10 April 1998 organising collection procedures and methods of performance, |
|
— |
African Convention on the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, known as the Algiers Convention of 1968, ratified by law No 27/80 of 21 April 1980, |
|
— |
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), ratified by law No 34/82 of 7 July 1982, to which Congo signed up on 31 January 1983, |
|
— |
Convention on Biological Diversity, Rio 1992, ratified by law No 29/96 of 25 June 1996, |
|
— |
International Tropical Timber Agreement, ratified by law No 28/96 of 25 June 1996, |
|
— |
Framework Convention on Climate Change, ratified by law No 26/96 of 25 June 1996, |
|
— |
Convention on wetlands of international importance, especially as waterfowl habitat (RAMSAR Convention), ratified by law No 28/96 of 25 June 1996, |
|
— |
Bonn Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals, 1985, ratified by law No 14/99 of 3 March 1999, |
|
— |
Convention to Combat Desertification, ratified by law No 8/99 of 8 January 1999, |
|
— |
Kyoto protocol to combat climate change, ratified by law No 24-2006 of 12 September 2006, |
|
— |
Treaty on the Central African Forest Commission, signed in Brazzaville on 5 February 2005 and ratified by law No 35-2006 of 26 October 2006 authorising ratification of the treaty relating to the conservation and sustainable management of the forest ecosystems of Central Africa and instituting the Central African Forest Commission. |
(1) The case of Eucalyptus Fibre Congo is currently the only exception, pending adjustment (cf. Annex IX). Here, State plantations covering around 48 000 ha were transferred in April 2008 for management by EFC under a long lease. For this purpose, the intention is to adopt the legislation setting out the conditions of transfer of plantations to third parties. Ultimately, the legality of this timber and these derived products will be shown in the legality matrix for timber produced in plantations.
ANNEX III
LEGALITY VERIFICATION SYSTEM (LVS)
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
The Legality Verification System (LVS) of the Republic of Congo is based on various legislation, regulations, directives and standards. There are two main aspects of the LVS:
|
— |
administrative checks, and |
|
— |
on-site checks. |
The LVS developed here is based on monitoring, checking and verification currently carried out as part of governmental supervision of the management and use of forest resources, but is enhanced to guarantee the reliability of the FLEGT licensing scheme introduced under this Agreement. The LVS consists of the following elements:
|
1. |
two legality matrices; |
|
2. |
a traceability system; |
|
3. |
verification of the legality of the forestry entity; |
|
4. |
verification of checking of the supply chain; |
|
5. |
issuing of FLEGT licences; |
|
6. |
independent audit. |
The LVS is operated by:
|
— |
two (02) Head Offices under the supervision of the General Forest Economy Office (DGEF): the Forestry Office and the Office for the Use of Forest Resources, |
|
— |
three (03) Divisional Inspectorates under the supervision of the General Forest Economy Inspectorate (IGEF): the Forest Inspectorate, the Inspectorate of Fauna and Protected Areas and the Administrative and Judicial Inspectorate, |
|
— |
twelve (12) Departmental Offices represented in all Departments of the country (Brazzaville, Pointe-Noire, Kouilou, Niari, Lékoumou, Bouenza, Pool, Plateaux, Cuvette-Ouest, Cuvette, Sangha, Likouala), along with their teams and control stations, |
|
— |
two (02) independent bodies: the Department for the Control of Forestry Products for Export (SCPFE) and its subsidiary offices and the National Centre for the Surveying and Management of Forestry and Fauna (CNIAF), |
|
— |
the departments of the trade authorities, |
|
— |
the departments of the legal authorities, |
|
— |
the departments of the customs authorities, |
|
— |
the departments of the tax authorities, |
|
— |
the departments of the labour authorities, |
|
— |
the departments of the environmental authorities, |
|
— |
the departments of the health authorities, |
|
— |
the departments of the social security authorities (the National Social Security Fund, CNSS), |
|
— |
forestry companies. |
Moreover, a civil society structure is set up to monitor the activities of the forestry companies and help develop verification procedures.
In addition, the LVS is audited by the Independent Auditor of the System.
The responsibilities of the various entities involved in operating the LVS system will be described in the following chapters.
However, the powers described of the various entities involved and the human resources needed, including the skill levels required for each post, will be detailed during the system development phase.
Similarly, in the organisation of control and verification functions, special attention will be paid to mechanisms for the management and control of potential conflicts of interest.
CHAPTER 2
COVERAGE
The LVS is applied to ALL national sources of timber and to imported products. All timber sold in Congo is therefore included in the legality verification system.
The verification of legality therefore covers the national market and export markets for all products defined in Annex I, irrespective of the country exported to.
The system also covers requirements with respect to timber of Congolese origin passing through other countries (in particular Cameroon).
CHAPTER 3
3.1. Legality matrices
The Congo LVS includes two legality matrices: (i) Matrix for Assessing the Legality of Timber Produced in Natural Forests in Congo and (ii) Matrix for Assessing the Legality of Timber Produced in Forest Plantations in Congo (cf. Annex II). The matrices contain indicators and verifiers concerning the following aspects:
|
— |
the existence of the forestry company, |
|
— |
the legal rights of access to forest resources and the granting of periodic licences, |
|
— |
compliance with management rules, |
|
— |
compliance with certain provisions on harvesting and processing, |
|
— |
compliance with environmental rules, |
|
— |
the conformity of tax returns and payment of duties and social security contributions within the stipulated deadlines, |
|
— |
the provision of information to and the involvement of civil society and local and indigenous populations in the management of the forestry concession, |
|
— |
respect for the rights of local and indigenous populations and workers, |
|
— |
the meeting of commitments with respect to contributing to socioeconomic development. |
The legality matrices define the requirements imposed on companies carrying out forestry activities and producing or processing timber and derived products. The indicators and verifiers in the matrix are divided into two categories: (i) those that are not linked to the traceability chain; and (ii) those that are verified within the framework of the traceability chain.
Sub-chapter 3.2 looks at the first of these categories, while Chapter 4 deals with the indicators and verifiers in the second category.
3.2. Verification procedures
The verification of legality is based on documentary evidence (checking of documents) and/or on-site visits. Certain indicators and verifiers can be verified just once during the company’s existence (validity of the certificate of exploitation and of the provision of the management plan). Other indicators and verifiers need to be verified periodically (every month or quarter) or once a year.
Table No 1 outlines the responsibilities, methods and frequency of verification of activities for timber produced in natural forests.
The verification strategy can be summarised as follows:
|
3.2(a) |
First level: checks carried out by authorised departments
Detailed terms for the communication of first level inspection results to the IGEF will be defined in the development phase of the system. These terms will also set out the way in which an authority informs the IGEF of an infringement. |
|
3.2(b) |
Second level: verification by the IGEF The IGEF has overall second level responsibility in verifying:
As far as verifying the legality of the forestry entity, the various checks mentioned under 3.2(a) enable the General Forest Economy Inspectorate to carry out its verification work through:
For that purpose, the IGEF is responsible for ensuring that the other institutions involved in carrying out checks (Trade, Labour, Tax, Agriculture, Land Management, Environment, CNSS, etc.) have carried out their tasks and received the results required for checking purposes. It does this of course through visits to the institutions concerned, documentary checks and verification of available databases. The various data resulting from the first level check will be verified by the IGEF, then approved. A written record of this second level verification process and approval will be retained and archived in accordance with the terms defined during the system development phase. |
This verification process results in the issuing of a legality certificate which is given to the applicant.
The legality of a company will be based on compliance with indicators and verifiers using a combined system, in other words the indicators and verifiers for the year preceding the legality certificate application have indeed been met and attest to the company’s legality and, on the other hand, no infringement has been reported in respect of the current year.
The legality certificate is valid for one year. Before expiry of the certificate, a new IGEF check is scheduled and carried out to enable the issuing of a legality certificate for the following year. If, for reasons outside the company’s control, this new check cannot be carried out by the deadline set, the certificate can be extended for a maximum of six months.
3.3. Verification of legality in certified forestry concessions
The various standards taken into account by the private bodies for the certification of forestry concessions in Congo (FSC, OLB, TLTV) have fully incorporated the main criteria, indicators and verifiers relating to:
|
— |
the legal existence of the company, |
|
— |
the holding of periodic licences permitting the activities, |
|
— |
compliance with legal and regulatory provisions relating to forestry, |
|
— |
compliance with regulations relating to management, forestry, timber processing and tax, |
|
— |
compliance with environmental rules, |
|
— |
subcontracting work in accordance with the regulations. |
A formal assessment of the standards for the private certification of forestry concessions in Congo (FSC, OLB, TLTV currently used in Congo and any other standards) with respect to the legality matrix will be carried out by the IGEF during the system development phase. Following this assessment, a report is drawn up that will be published and publicly accessible.
If this assessment is favourable, the private certification system will be approved by the IGEF. This approval will be published. It will hence allow the IGEF to grant a legality certificate to companies certified under such a system, without the IGEF having to carry out any specific assessment itself, avoiding double verification of legality in these certified forestry concessions.
However, the forestry company receiving this approved certification has to send the General Forestry Economy Inspectorate all certification audit reports drawn up under the private certification system to enable it to monitor compliance with legality in this process and thus enable the issuing of the legality certificate in respect of the company concerned. It also has to inform the IGEF immediately of any suspension or withdrawal of the private certificate. The terms for carrying out the corrective actions required under private certification systems will be laid down during the system development phase.
3.4. Failure to comply with matrix requirements
Under the LVS, any failure to comply with legality requirements will be handled in accordance with legal and regulatory provisions applicable in the country concerned. Current provisions will be supplemented by a series of supplementary measures.
If matrix requirements are not complied with, all measures will be taken to withdraw the legality certificate and, if applicable, seize any shipments for which a FLEGT licence application is pending. The legality certificate may then be cancelled by the IGEF in the event of practices breaching requirements with respect to the FLEGT system duly identified by the IGEF and/or by the Joint Implementation Committee of the Agreement.
A manual outlining how to deal with any failure to comply with indicators in the legality matrix and/or in the traceability system will be developed during the system development period. It will explain, amongst other things, how to deal with these breaches, including failure to meet prescribed deadlines, any corrective action required, and the liability of the various parties concerned in this respect. Terms regarding the management and dissemination of information relating to these breaches will also be defined during the system development phase.
Table 1: Checking and verification of verifiers not linked to the traceability chain for timber produced in natural forests
|
Aspect of legality |
Indicator/verifier |
Responsibility for the 1st level check |
Verification means |
Verification frequency |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Trade Authority |
Documentary verification |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Labour Authority |
Documentary verification |
Once a year |
|||||
|
DDEF/Teams |
Documentary verification |
Once a year |
|||||
|
DDEF/Teams |
Documentary verification |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Judicial Authority |
Documentary verification |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Judicial Authority |
Documentary verification |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Labour Authority |
Documentary verification |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Trade Authority |
Documentary verification |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Legal rights of access to forestry resources (2) |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
DDEF Teams |
Verification of documents |
Once during the validity of the CTI/CAT |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
DDEF Teams |
Verification of documents and on-site verification of the Departmental Forest Economy Office |
Once a year |
|||||
|
DDEF Teams |
Verification of documents and on-site verification of the Departmental Forest Economy Office |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Customs Authority, Tax Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
DDEF/Teams |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Compliance with management rules |
|
DDEF Teams |
Verification of documents (examination of reports) |
Once during the management plan drafting period |
||||
|
DDEF Teams |
Verification of documents (examination of minutes) |
Once during the management plan drafting period |
|||||
|
Compliance with provisions on timber harvesting and processing (4) |
|
DDEF Teams |
Verification of documents and on-site verification |
Once a year |
||||
|
DDEF Teams |
On-site verification |
Once a year |
|||||
|
DDEF Teams |
On-site verification |
Once a year |
|||||
|
DDEF Teams |
Verification of documents, on-site verification, SIGEF consultation |
Once a month |
|||||
|
DDEF Teams |
Verification of documents, on-site verification, SIGEF consultation |
Once a year |
|||||
|
DDEF Teams |
Verification of documents and on-site verification |
Once a year |
|||||
|
DDEF Teams |
Verification of documents, on-site verification, SIGEF consultation |
Once a year |
|||||
|
DDEF Teams |
On-site verification |
Once a year |
|||||
|
DDEF Teams |
Verification of documents and on-site verification |
Once a year |
|||||
|
DDEF Teams |
Verification of documents and on-site verification |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Verification of documents and on-site verification |
Verification of documents and on-site verification |
Twice a year |
|||||
|
DDEF Teams |
Verification of documents and on-site verification |
Twice a year |
|||||
|
DDEF Teams |
On-site verification |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Conformity of tax returns and payment of taxes and social security contributions. |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Tax Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Customs Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a month |
|||||
|
Customs Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Customs Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Tax Authority and DDEF |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Teams Labour Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
DDEF Teams |
|
Once a month |
|||||
|
Twice a year |
|||||||
|
Tax Authority and Customs Authority |
|
Once a month |
|||||
|
Twice a year |
|||||||
|
Tax Authority |
|
Once a month |
|||||
|
Twice a year |
|||||||
|
Tax Authority |
|
Once a month |
|||||
|
Twice a year |
|||||||
|
Tax Authority, DDEF, Teams |
|
Once a month |
|||||
|
Twice a year |
|||||||
|
Compliance with environmental legislation and regulations |
|
Environmental Authority |
|
Once while the study is being carried out |
||||
|
Environmental Authority |
|
Once a year |
|||||
|
Once a year |
|||||||
|
Health Authority Environmental Authority |
|
Once a year |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Health Authority Environmental Authority |
|
Once a year |
|||||
|
Forestry Authority |
|
Twice a year |
|||||
|
Once a year |
|||||||
|
Provision of information to and the involvement of civil society and local and indigenous populations in the management of the forestry concession |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
DDEF Teams |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
DDEF Teams |
On-site verification, verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
DDEF Teams |
On-site verification, verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Respect for the rights of local and indigenous populations and workers |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
DDEF Teams |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
DDEF Teams |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
DDEF Teams |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
DDEF Teams |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
DDEF Teams |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
DDEF Teams |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
DDEF Teams |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
DDEF Teams |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Labour Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Forestry Authority, Labour Authority |
On-site verification |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Forestry Authority, Labour Authority |
On-site verification |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Labour Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Labour Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Labour Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Labour Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Labour Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Forestry Authority, Labour Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Labour Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Labour Authority, Forestry Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Labour Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Labour Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Health Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Labour Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Labour Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Labour Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
DDEF Teams |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Labour Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Labour Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Labour Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Labour Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Labour Authority, DDEF |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Labour Authority, DDEF |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Labour Authority, DDEF |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Labour Authority, DDEF |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
The company complies with regulations regarding timber transportation and marketing |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Transport Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Transport Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Transport Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Transport Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Transport Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Transport Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
|||||
|
Transport Authority |
Verification of documents |
Once a year |
By analogy, during the system development phase, a similar table will be drawn up for special permits and timber from plantations.
CHAPTER 4
4.1. Principles for checking the supply chain/traceability system
Congo has a timber traceability system based on the following four (04) main aspects:
|
— |
the origin or provenance of the product, |
|
— |
the identification of the product by marking, |
|
— |
the registration of basic information relating to these products in a medium that itself has well-established traceability, |
|
— |
the monitoring of products. |
This system was established in law 16-2000 of 20 November 2000 setting out the forestry code and its main implementing provisions, in particular decree 2002-437 of 31 December 2002 laying down the conditions of forest management and use. Regulations on traceability relate to four (04) main aspects (origin or provenance, identification of the product by marking, registration of basic information, monitoring of products). They state that:
|
— |
the forestry operator is obliged to take, from a clearly specified area referred to as the annual harvest, a volume of timber corresponding to the Maximum Annual Volume (MAV) allowed by the Forestry Authority. This area, which is geographically referencable using the GIS geographic information system, is the starting point for products authorised for felling. This annual harvest consists of areas in which a full count of harvestable trees has been carried out, these trees being marked beforehand with white paint at the base during counting. The results of counting given on a 1/20 000 map and a 1/50 000 map or sketch show all of the depots, roads and tracks already opened and those yet to be opened. Based on the declaratory information provided by forest operators, the Forestry Authority verifies the accuracy of the counts and the boundaries set for the annual harvest before granting the harvest licence, |
|
— |
for each tree felled, the operator must:
|
|
— |
the forestry operator has to provide the Forestry Authority, each month, with a statement indicating the production carried out in terms of species and destination. At the end of the year, he is obliged to file with the Forestry Authority an annual summary statement indicating the volume of production in terms of species and destination, |
|
— |
monitoring and checks are carried out by the authorised departments of the Forestry Authority, namely:
|
The civil society structure can also accompany the IGEF on its on-site inspections and carry out its own on-site monitoring.
4.2. Architectural structure: Steps for the tracing of timber from natural forests
4.2(a) Agreements
Tracing timber from natural forests resulting from concessions covered by an agreement (management and processing agreement or industrial processing agreement) involves eight (8) steps:
— Step 1: Preparation and annual harvest application file (count map, road network map, etc.),
— Step 2: Verification of the boundaries and the results of the count, then granting of the annual harvest licence,
— Step 3: Cutting of the timber (felling, cutting off top and bottom, extraction, sawing or preparation of logs),
— Step 4: Storage of logs at various production depots (forest depot, export depot, plant depot),
— Step 5: Transportation of products: logs from forest depots to processing units/ports for export/local market; processed timber from processing units to the port for export/local market,
— Step 6: Local processing of logs (first, second, etc.),
— Step 7: Export of products from the port (port of Pointe-Noire to Congo or port of Douala to Cameroon),
— Step 8: Local trade networks in national markets.
Improvements will be made to the existing system under the LVS in the following steps:
— Step 1: The marking of trees will be supplemented by a prospection number for each tree which must then be put on a map. Registration will be improved by setting up a file or a register of the numbering of prospected trees and by files and/or maps showing the allotment of felling areas with the geo-referenced positioning of trees,
— Step 2: Management teams and/or subsidiary offices of the CNIAF will lend their expertise to improve Forestry Authority procedures for verifying the accuracy of systematic inventory results for the annual harvest,
— Step 3: The marking of trunks will be improved by adding the date or year of felling and the annual harvest number. Management teams and/or subsidiary offices of the CNIAF will lend their expertise to improve Forestry Authority procedures for monitoring and checking the annual harvest. In addition, daily production reports (felling, cutting off top and bottom, haulage and extraction, etc.), files or maps showing the allotment of felling areas with the positioning of trees in the MAV and worksite reports will be included in the list of compulsory worksite documents. The verification of stumps will only be possible in specific disputes. In such cases, members of the Team will verify stumps to establish the stump count,
— Step 4: The marking of logs will be improved by adding a code indicating the destination (plant or export). In addition, logs will have to be stored/packaged according to the allocated use (local plant or export). Management teams and/or subsidiary offices of the CNIAF will lend their expertise to improve Forestry Authority procedures for monitoring and checking the annual harvest. In addition, daily production reports (felling, cutting off top, extraction, etc.), files or maps showing the allotment of felling areas with the positioning of trees in the MAV and worksite reports will be included in the list of compulsory worksite documents,
— Step 6: the registration of timber will be improved by the introduction of daily production files and a register of processed timber leaving the plant.
The new structure of the traceability chain to be introduced for timber from natural forests exploited on the basis of an agreement is as follows:
Table 2: Structure of the traceability chain for timber exploited on the basis of an agreement
|
Steps |
Operations |
Party responsible for the operation |
Data to be encoded |
Party responsible for encoding/Existing documents |
Verification (physical and documentary check) and frequency |
Reconciliation of data |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
The forestry company carries out systematic counts of exploitable trees and marks them with white paint |
|
|
|
The test of correspondence with the management inventory is carried out on closure of the last harvesting site of the Forestry Production Unit (FPU). The FPU is a subdivision of the management plan covering 5 AACs |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Verification of systematic counting
|
The DDEF/Team ensures that the results of the count are accurate by recounting 5 % of the parcels counted |
|
|
|
Test of correspondence of data by comparing the number of trees in the counting phase with those in the recounting phase |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
The forestry company measures each log and marks it using a bar code The bar code number differs from the prospection number |
The bar code will be linked to the following information: AAC No, name of the operator, year of exploitation, AAC area, No of parcels concerned, in particular to allow the correspondence test |
|
|
Test of correspondence of data by comparing the number of trees felled per species category with that stated in the annual harvest licence in step 1 The MAV (m3) is not a relevant indicator in that the annual harvest licence is granted on the basis of an indicative volume established using the volume table |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sawing and allocation of logs (logs for local plants or for export)
|
The forestry company scans all of the bar codes |
|
|
|
Test of the correspondence of data by comparing tree numbers/bar codes from step 3 (cutting) with tree numbers/bar codes from step 4 (storage) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
The transport company scans all of the bar codes |
|
|
At control stations, verification of transported timber (species and marks) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
The company notes the volumes and scans all of the bar codes on their arrival at the company’s plant depot It draws up daily production reports The company has to monitor/check stocks of logs and finished products |
|
|
Checking of timber yields on the basis of the daily reports |
Test of correspondence of data by comparing:
Test of correspondence between the following three steps:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Compilation of timber export files: Waybills, Specification sheets, AVEs, EX1 (formerly D6), EX8 (formerly D15), certificate of origin, dispatch note, phytosanitary certificate, shipment note, manifest/bill of lading Pro forma of the commercial invoice, Customs declaration and Delivery note |
The company responsible for exporting scans all of the bar codes The SCPFE verifies correspondence between the statements and the physical checks. In addition, on the basis of the validation of the IGEF, the SCPFE verifies the correspondence of statements with the data recorded in the SIGEF and grants an FLEGT licence |
Bar code number (logs or packages of finished products) |
|
|
Test of correspondence of data by comparing:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Local sale of processed products (planks, beams, rafters and other exposed timber) |
The company keeps accounts of local sales |
Number of packages/package number |
|
|
Test of correspondence of data by comparing production reports from steps 6 (processing) and 8 (local trade) |
NB: Through use of a (unique) felling number, the identity of the product is guaranteed right along the chain. All timber entered will be saved on the traceability system and will be used for charitable activities to help local authorities and socio-sanitary structures (schools, hospitals, etc.). The General Forest Economy Office will ensure that it is appropriately codified.
Semi-finished products (sawn products, veneered products, rotary process products, etc.) are marked according to lots established on the basis of the product and/or the client. The method of dealing with ‘material yield’ still has to be enhanced in order to improve monitoring of timber at the plant.
The Department for the Control of Forestry Products for Export (SCPFE) sends, in accordance with the provisions of Article 130 of Decree No 2002-437 of 31 December 2002 laying down the conditions of forest management and use, a monthly report to the office of the Minister responsible for forests, to the General Forest Economy Office and to the General Forestry Economy Inspectorate (this report must state the volumes or quantities of timber exported and the timber in transit by species, by merchantable quality, by recipient (timber for export) or sender (timber in transit) and by supplier. Details relating to timber in transit are given in paragraph 4.4.
Companies that have their own traceability system will be linked to the national traceability system to enable data transfer.
For any timber not exported directly from the port of Pointe-Noire, the methods of reconciling data with that produced by the timber depot company in Douala and bodies verifying legality in neighbouring countries will be laid down in the system development phase.
4.2(b) Special permits
Timber from natural forests cut on the basis of special permits must follow the traceability chain consisting of the following five (05) main steps:
— Step 1: Application for and granting of the certificate of exploitation (special permit),
— Step 2: Cutting of the timber (felling, cutting off top and bottom, extraction, sawing or preparation of logs),
— Step 3: Product processing,
— Step 4: Transportation of processed timber,
— Step 5: Local market for processed timber.
Improvement will be made in the following steps:
— Step 1: Registration of counted and marked trees in a working document (inventory report or report on the identification of marked trees and map showing the location of marked trees). The marking report must be included on the list of compulsory worksite documents,
— Step 2: Registration of felled trees in worksite documents (production report, worksite book). Production reports and the worksite book must be included on the list of compulsory worksite documents,
— Step 3: Registration of processed timber in a processed-product register. Production reports and the processed-timber register or register of timber entering the plant must be included on the list of compulsory worksite documents,
— Step 4: Registration of transported products in a waybill. The special permit relates to the number of trees or trunks. It must be supplemented by the waybill indicating the number, volume, origin, destination and date of production of transported products,
— Step 5: Registration of products placed on the local market in a waybill.
It should be pointed out that, under the provisions of Article 186 of Decree No 2002-437 of 31 December 2002 laying down the conditions of forest management and use, the special permit for the exploitation of tree species for commercial purposes is, according to Article 70 of the Forestry Code, only granted in areas where populations have difficulty obtaining manufactured timber. These products are sold exclusively in the areas concerned, as determined by an order of the minister responsible for the forest economy.
By law, products found outside the areas concerned are in breach and are therefore seized and used for charitable activities to help local authorities and socio-sanitary structures (schools, hospitals, etc.). The General Forest Economy Office will ensure that it is appropriately codified.
If the verifiers of the legality of products exploited on the basis of trees felled under special permits are verified, the structure of the traceability chain to be put in place can be described as follows:
Table 3: Structure of the traceability chain for timber exploited on the basis of special permits
|
Steps |
Operations |
Party responsible for the operation |
Data to be encoded |
Party responsible for encoding/existing documents |
Verification (physical and documentary check) and frequency |
Reconciliation of data |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
The DDEF and the special permit applicant mark the requested trees |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
The holder of the special permit measures each log, its volume and the marking of a number |
|
|
|
Test of correspondence of data by comparing the number of trees felled per species category with that stated in the marking report |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Performance of timber processing operations
|
The holder of the special permit measures the volume of products obtained |
|
|
|
Test of the correspondence of data by comparing product quantities in terms of trees from step 3 (processing) with the volume of trees from step 2 (cutting) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
The holder of the special permit records any products resulting from the processing of felled trees |
|
|
|
Test of the correspondence of data by comparing product quantities in terms of trees from step 3 (processing) with the number of trees/tree number from step 2 (cutting) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Local sale of processed products (planks, beams, rafters and other exposed timber) |
The holder of the special permit keeps accounts of local sales |
Number of products obtained by category (planks, beams, rafters, boards) |
|
|
Test of the correspondence of data by comparing product quantities in terms of trees from step 3 (processing) with the number of trees/tree number from step 2 (cutting) |
What is referred to as small-scale production falls within the scope of special permit requirements. It relates to the use of the bottoms of trees authorised by the Forestry Authority on the basis of special permits. However, it is still necessary to ensure that the database is complete through worksite documents and the SIGEF. The applicability of this provision requires:
|
— |
the marking of trees in accordance with applicable rules (marking of standing trees and marking of felled trees), |
|
— |
the registration of trunks and logs in accordance with applicable rules (worksite book), |
|
— |
the declaration of processed products (timber exploited on the basis of special permits is systematically processed at the harvest site. This relates to sawn timber (planks, rafters, beams, boards), means of transport (canoe), etc.), |
|
— |
This system, which increases timber traceability, requires the stump and trunk to be marked in order to provide comprehensive traceability. |
4.3. Architectural structure: Steps for the tracing of timber from forestry plantations
Timber from plantations has to follow the traceability chain consisting of the following seven (07) main steps:
— Step 1: Application for and granting of the certificate of exploitation (plantation timber permit),
— Step 2: Cutting of the timber (felling, cutting off top and bottom, extraction, sawing or preparation of logs, posts and/or steres),
— Step 3: Storage of products (logs, posts and/or steres) in the various production depots,
— Step 4: Transportation of products (logs, posts, etc.) at processing units/ports of export, posts and/or steres to the local market,
— Step 5: Local processing of products (logs etc.),
— Step 6: Exporting of products (logs, posts, etc.) from the port of export (Pointe-Noire),
— Step 7: Local trade networks for by-products.
It should be pointed out that improvements will be made during the implementation phase in the following steps:
— Step 1: The annual harvest must be a compulsory worksite document,
— Step 2: Production reports (felling reports etc.) and worksite books must be compulsory worksite documents,
— Step 3: Production reports (handling/classification reports etc.) and worksite books must be compulsory worksite documents,
— Step 4: Registration of transported products in waybills. The plantation timber harvest permit must be supplemented by the waybill indicating the number, volume, origin, destination, date of production etc. of transported products,
|
— |
The marking of logs will be improved by adding a code indicating the destination (plant or export). Management teams and/or subsidiary offices of the CNIAF will lend their expertise to improve Forestry Authority procedures for monitoring and checking the annual harvest. In addition, daily production reports (felling, cutting off top, extraction, etc.), files or maps showing the allotment of felling areas with the positioning of trees in the MAV and worksite reports will be included in the list of compulsory worksite documents, |
— Step 5: The registration of timber will be improved by the introduction of a register of timber entering the plant depot, a register of timber entering the plant (logs in the plant depot entering the plant) and a register of processed products (products obtained from logs entering the plant). A control station will be set up in the plant depot,
— Step 6: The registration of exported products will be improved by waybills, specification sheets, AVEs, bills of lading and other documents included in the compiling of the file on timber for export.
Under the framework of sustainable forest management, managed plantations will have administrative plans and annual operation plans. Each annual operation plan will be consolidated on the basis of an assessment (inventory). Monitoring products from this annual harvest can be carried out by marking packages.
The structure of the traceability chain to be introduced for timber from forest plantations exploited on the basis of plantation timber harvest permits is as follows:
Table 4: Structure of the traceability chain for timber harvested from forestry plantations
|
Steps |
Operations |
Party responsible for the operation |
Data to be encoded |
Party responsible for encoding/Source of information for existing documents |
Verification (physical and documentary check) and frequency |
Reconciliation of data |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Compilation and submission of plantation timber permit application files |
Company |
|
|
|
A full list of trees unsuitable for sale is drawn up (populations and reasons) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
The company measures each log |
|
|
|
Test of correspondence of data by comparing the number of trees felled per species category with that stated in the harvest licence |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sawing and allocation of logs (logs for local plants or for export)
|
The forestry company scans all of the bar codes |
|
|
|
Test of the correspondence of data by comparing tree numbers from step 2 (cutting) with tree numbers from step 3 (storage) Reconciliation on the basis of volumes |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
The transport company scans all of the bar codes |
|
|
At control stations, verification of transported timber |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
The company measures the volume in the following three steps: on entry into the plant depot, on entry into the production processing line and on exit from production at the end of the production line. It draws up daily production reports |
|
|
Checking of timber yields on the basis of the daily reports |
Test of correspondence of data by comparing:
Test of correspondence between the following three steps:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Compilation of timber export files: Waybills, Specification sheets, AVEs, EX1 (formerly D6), EX8 (formerly D15), certificate of origin, dispatch note, phytosanitary certificate, shipment note, manifest/ bill of lading, pro forma of the commercial invoice, Customs declaration and Delivery note |
The company responsible for exporting scans all of the bar codes The SCPFE verifies the correspondence of data on products for export and grants an AVE |
Bar code number (logs or finished products) |
|
|
Test of correspondence of data by comparing (logs):
Test of correspondence of data by comparing (processed products): Volume leaving the plant and volumes for export |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Local sale of by-products (firewood, charcoal) |
The company keeps accounts of local sales |
Number of packages obtained by category (steres of firewood, bags of charcoal) |
|
|
Test of correspondence of data by comparing production reports from steps 5 (processing), 6 (export) and 8 (local trade) |
4.4. Timber from abroad in transit through Congolese territory or imported for processing in Congo
The transportation across Congolese territory of timber imported from other countries is controlled using the LVS.
At present, no timber is imported into Congo from other countries for processing in Congolese plants. However, timber does pass through Congolese territory, in other words it is imported for re-exporting from the port of Pointe-Noire, for example.
The legality of imported timber is always verified at the Republic of Congo border.
The supply chain of timber in transit or imported timber before it enters Congolese territory cannot be controlled in the same way as timber from national forests.
Border procedures for controlling timber in transit or imported timber, its marking and those responsible for carrying out checks will be specified in supplementary rules to be published and implemented during the system development phase. These procedures will take into account the existence or otherwise of legality verification systems in the country of origin. All timber imported and in transit will be entered on the traceability system in accordance with terms to be laid down during the system development phase.
4.5. Failure to meet the legality requirements linked to the traceability system
The supply chain for each shipment of timber and derived products is controlled under the traceability system. Procedures to deal with any problems that may be identified will be developed in the LVS during the system development phase.
If matrix requirements are not complied with, all measures will be taken to suspend the FLEGT licence grant procedure and, if applicable, seize shipments concerned.
A manual outlining how to deal with any failure to comply with indicators in the legality matrix and/or in the traceability system will be developed during the system development phase.
The traceability of timber will be monitored through a database (SIGEF) that has an auto-blocking system. If legality requirements linked with the traceability system are not complied with, the SIGEF database will be able to show the requirement that has not been complied with, which can be accessed in real time at the IGEF when the licence application is being examined.
CHAPTER 5
5.1. Management of data for verification in accordance with the legality matrices
Data for verification in accordance with the legality matrices will be managed by the IGEF using Microsoft Excel type electronic files or other databases. During the system development phase, detailed procedures are to be drawn up regarding the management of data for verification in accordance with the legality matrices, agreements on the accessing of data by the various parties, the consequences of a failure to meet one of the legality criteria (auto-blocking system) and the format of the legality certificate.
5.2. The management of data in the timber traceability chain
The improved SIGEF is the traceability system developed on the basis of the SIGEF system existing in 2009 as an information system for data currently stored in the databases of the DDEF, CNIAF and SCPFE. It is referred to as SIGEF throughout this document.
The basic data for monitoring the course of timber entered into the database will be sent by forestry companies, if possible every day via the Internet, to the central SIGEF database at the General Forest Economy Office. Moreover, validation by Departmental Forest Economy Offices (DDEFs) of data after analysis of monthly production reports will also be entered on the system, preferably over the Internet.
Data in the supply chain will be managed with the aid of a centralised database (SIGEF) which will help provide synergies between the various parties. Management of this centralised database involves:
|
— |
the creation of an information management structure within the ministry placed under the General Office. This structure will also deal with the production of bar codes, |
|
— |
the development of information management software capable of meeting the requirements of traceability, |
|
— |
the development of a ministry website with a window for accessing the database accessible to all those involved under certain conditions. |
The parties responsible for gathering information are:
|
— |
The CNIAF, |
|
— |
Subcontractors (preparation for annual harvests), |
|
— |
Forestry companies (worksite books), |
|
— |
Departmental offices, |
|
— |
Control station on exit from worksites (Team), |
|
— |
Control station on entry to the plant (Team), |
|
— |
Entry into the production line and exit from the production line (Team), |
|
— |
Control station on exit from the plant (Team), |
|
— |
Control station on entry into the port (SCPFE), |
|
— |
Data entry station (Team/Departmental office), |
|
— |
Forestry companies (declaration). |
The General Forest Economy Office, which will house the SIGEF, will be the body responsible for maintaining and managing the traceability system.
Data will be regularly verified by local structures (DDEF) on each approval of data entered into the SIGEF and the product traceability chain. A plan is currently being put together for this purpose. It will enable, during implementation (2009 to 2010), the improved traceability system of the Republic of Congo to be specified and implemented. The software and appropriate computer equipment for this and the data management agreements will be defined and approved when the said plan is put into practice.
CHAPTER 6
ISSUING OF FLEGT LICENCES
The granting of FLEGT licences only relates to timber and derived products exported to the Union. Timber and derived products in transit under the control of the Congolese customs authorities will not require a FLEGT licence for export to the Union. The Congolese authorities will provide the European customs authorities with documentation enabling them to establish that the timber and shipments concerned do not require a FLEGT licence. The nature and form of this documentation will be specified during system development.
Each shipment of timber and derived products in Annex I produced in natural forests and forest plantations in the Republic of Congo requires a FLEGT licence. The FLEGT licence is issued by the SCPFE, on instruction by the IGEF, and is given to the applicant.
The FLEGT licence is issued for a shipment of timber and derived products under the following conditions:
|
1. |
the company filing the application has a valid legality certificate; |
|
2. |
the SIGEF database contains all of the data relating to this shipment. |
The IGEF will also have to ensure first of all that legality has been verified by the authorised departments, and in particular that:
|
— |
a legality certificate has been issued in accordance with applicable procedures described in Chapter 3, |
|
— |
the supply chain is controlled by authorised departments in accordance with applicable procedures described in Chapter 4, |
|
— |
the FLEGT licence will be granted by the subsidiary offices of the SCPFE located near the production sites, on the basis of a document produced from the SIGEF, in accordance with the terms laid down during the system development phase. |
Electronic licences will not be dealt with under this Agreement.
Information relating to issued licences will be kept in a paper file and a digital file at the IGEF. Licences are issued in paper form at a local level in accordance with Article 6 of Annex V. Local archiving is managed by the SCPFE which keeps copies for the authority granting FLEGT licences, in accordance with Article 6 of Annex V. A photocopy is made and sent to the IGEF for central archiving. This will enable the IGEF to reconcile licence applications with FLEGT licences duly granted.
Information on licences will be published on a website by virtue of arrangements set out in Annex X.
The specifications of FLEGT licences and procedures relating to issuing them are described in Annex V and will be developed further during the system development phase, in particular with respect to grant periods and authority to sign licences. Procedures for issuing the legality certificate will also be developed during the implementation phase.
CHAPTER 7
INDEPENDENT AUDIT OF THE SYSTEM
An independent audit of the system is planned. Separate terms of reference have been drawn up and are given in Annex VI.
ANNEX IV
CONDITIONS GOVERNING THE RELEASE FOR FREE CIRCULATION INTO THE UNION OF TIMBER AND DERIVED PRODUCTS EXPORTED FROM A PARTNER COUNTRY AND COVERED BY A FLEGT LICENCE
General framework
Regulation (EC) No 2173/2005 and its implementing regulation, Commission Regulation (EC) No 1024/2008 of 17 October 2008 laying down detailed measures for the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 2173/2005 (1) govern the conditions for the entry into the European market of timber and derived products covered by a FLEGT licence from Congo. The procedures described in those regulations provide for the possibility of adaptation to national conditions, and in particular the possibility that the competent authorities responsible for accepting FLEGT licences on entry into the European market may be customs authorities or another authority. For this reason, the description of the process divides verification into two steps: (1) documentary checking of licences and (2) checking that the actual shipment complies with the licence. This process is intended to supplement the checks carried out by Congo and to verify that FLEGT licences presented on entry into Europe are indeed those duly issued and registered by the Congolese licence granting authority and cover the shipments as intended by the Congolese authorities. The competent authorities are not entitled to challenge the Congolese legality verification system or the validity of granted licences, these issues optionally being dealt with by the Joint Implementation Committee of the Agreement in accordance with Articles 12, 19 and 24 of this Agreement.
Article 1
Processing licences
1. The FLEGT licence, hereinafter referred to as ‘licence’, shall be lodged with the competent authorities of the Member State of the Union in which the shipment (2) covered by that licence is declared for release for free circulation (3).
2. The competent authorities referred to in paragraph 1 shall, in accordance with the applicable national procedures, inform the customs authorities as soon as a licence has been accepted.
Article 2
Documentary check of licences
1. Paper-based licences shall conform to the model licence in Annex V.
2. A licence shall be considered as void if the date on which it is lodged is later than the date of expiry indicated in the licence.
3. Any erasures in or alterations to a licence shall not be accepted unless such erasures or alterations have been validated by the licensing authority.
4. The extension of the validity of a licence shall not be accepted unless that extension has been validated by the licensing authority.
5. A duplicate or replacement licence shall not be accepted unless it has been issued and validated by the licensing authority.
Article 3
Request for additional information
1. In case of doubt concerning the validity of a licence, a duplicate or a replacement licence, the competent authorities may request additional information from the licensing authority.
2. A copy of the licence, the duplicate or the replacement licence in question may be forwarded together with the request.
Article 4
Physical verification
1. If applicable, the competent authorities verify whether the actual shipment complies with the corresponding licence.
2. If further verification of the shipment is considered necessary by the competent authorities, checks may be carried out to establish whether the shipment in question conforms to the information provided in the licence and to the records relating to the relevant licence which are held by the licensing authority.
3. Where the volume or weight of the timber products contained in the shipment presented for release for free circulation does not deviate by more than 10 % from the volume or weight indicated in the corresponding licence, it shall be considered that the shipment conforms to the information provided in the licence so far as volume or weight is concerned.
4. Costs incurred while the verification is completed shall be at the expense of the importer, except where national legislation of Member States concerned determines otherwise.
Article 5
Prior verification
A licence lodged before the arrival of the shipment that it covers may be accepted if the licence meets all the requirements set out in Annex V to this Agreement and no further verification in accordance with Articles 3 and 4 of this Annex is deemed necessary.
Article 6
Release for free circulation
1. Reference shall be made, in box 44 of the Single Administrative Document on which the customs declaration for release for free circulation is made, to the number of the licence that covers the timber and derived products subject to that declaration.
Where the customs declaration is made by means of a data-processing technique, the reference shall be provided in the appropriate box.
2. Timber and derived products can be released for free circulation only after completion of the procedure described in this Annex.
(1) OJ L 277, 18.10.2008, p. 23.
(2) Shipment means a given quantity of timber and derived products referred to in Annexes II and III of Regulation (EC) No 2173/2005 along with a FLEGT licence that is sent by a consignor or a shipper on departure from a partner country and is presented for release for free circulation at a customs office in the Union.
(3) Release for free circulation is a Union customs procedure. According to Article 129(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 450/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 laying down the Community Customs Code (Modernised Customs Code), release for free circulation shall entail the following: (1) the collection of any import duties due; (2) the collection, as appropriate, of other charges, as provided for under relevant provisions in force relating to the collection of those charges; (3) the application of commercial policy measures and prohibitions and restrictions in so far as they have not been applied at an earlier stage (in this case, it is among these measures that the existence of a FLEGT licence will be verified); (4) completion of the other formalities laid down in respect of the importation of the goods. Release for free circulation shall confer on non-Community goods the customs status of Community goods.
ANNEX V
CONDITIONS GOVERNING THE ISSUANCE AND SPECIFICATIONS OF FLEGT LICENCES
CHAPTER 1
APPLICATION FORMALITIES
Congo has undertaken, within the framework of the FLEGT process to which it has signed up, to make the exporting of its timber to the Union subject to a FLEGT licence. This means that those producing and trading in exported timber have to adopt FLEGT requirements.
Responsibility for supervising the verification of legality for the purposes of granting FLEGT licences for the exporting of timber and derived products to the Union will be conferred on the General Forestry Economy Inspectorate.
The procedure for obtaining FLEGT licences consists of two successive steps:
|
1. |
an application for a legality certificate sent to the General Forestry Economy Inspectorate;
|
|
2. |
an application for a FLEGT licence for a given shipment, e-mailed to the General Forestry Economy Inspectorate. If the applicant submits a valid legality certificate, the General Inspectorate will consult the SIGEF database looked after by the General Forest Economy Office, take into account the opinion of the SCPFE (Department for the Control of Forestry Products for Export), verify the completeness of the database relating to this shipment and the absence of any block, keep written evidence of it and order the SCPFE to issue the FLEGT licence and send it to the applicant. However, shipment legality verification inspections can be carried out on a one-off basis. The procedure for granting licences will be laid down during the system development phase, then communicated by the IGEF to the interested parties, in particular potential exporters, and published on a website. |
CHAPTER 2
FEES
The granting of a licence is subject to payment of a fee the level and payment terms of which will be laid down by an order of the Minister responsible for the Forest Economy.
CHAPTER 3
REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO FLEGT LICENCES
Article 1
1. A FLEGT licence is paper-based.
2. The licence shall provide the information mentioned in Appendix 1, in accordance with the notes for guidance set out in Appendix 2.
Article 2
1. The FLEGT licence is to become valid on its actual day of issue.
2. The period of validity of the FLEGT licence shall not exceed nine (09) months. The date of expiry shall be indicated in the licence.
3. After its expiry the licence shall be considered as void.
4. The FLEGT licence shall cease to be valid and will be returned to the licensing authority if the timber products covered have been destroyed.
REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO PAPER-BASED FLEGT LICENCES
Article 3
Paper-based licences shall conform to the format set out in Appendix 1.
Article 4
1. The paper to be used is standard A4 format.
2. The colour of the paper to be used for the form shall be as follows:
|
(a) |
white for form No 1, the ‘Original’; |
|
(b) |
yellow for form No 2, the ‘Copy for Union customs’; |
|
(c) |
green for form No 3, the ‘Copy for the licensing authority’. |
Article 5
1. The licences shall be completed on a computer or typewriter.
2. The stamps of the licensing authority shall be applied by means of a dry metal stamp. The licensing authority shall use any tamper-proof method to record the quantities allocated in letters and figures in such a way as to make it impossible to insert figures or additional comments.
3. The form may not contain any erasures or alterations, unless those erasures or alterations have been authenticated by the stamp and signature of the licensing authority.
4. The licences shall be printed and completed in French.
Article 6
1. The licence shall be drawn up in triplicate, two copies being issued to the applicant.
2. The first copy, marked ‘Original’ shall, after being completed, signed and stamped by the licensing authority, be given to the applicant for submission to the competent authorities of the Member State of the Union in which the shipment covered by that licence is declared for release for free circulation.
3. The second one, marked ‘Copy for the European Community customs’, shall, after being completed, signed and stamped by the licensing authority, be given to the applicant for submission to the customs authorities of the Member State of the Union in which the shipment covered by that licence is declared for release for free circulation.
4. The third one, marked ‘Copy for the licensing authority’, shall, after being completed, signed and stamped by the licensing authority, be archived by the licensing authority.
FLEGT LICENCE LOST, STOLEN OR DESTROYED
Article 7
1. In the event of loss, theft or destruction of the ‘Original’ or the ‘Copy for the Union customs’, the holder or the authorised representative thereof may apply to the licensing authority for a replacement on the basis of the document in their possession.
2. In the event of loss, theft or destruction of both the ‘Original’ and the ‘Copy for the Union customs’, the holder or authorised representative thereof may apply to the licensing authority for replacements of both.
3. The licensing authority shall issue the replacement(s) within two (2) weeks following receipt of the request from the holder.
4. The replacements shall contain the information and entries appearing on the previous licence, including the number. The replacement licence shall bear the endorsement ‘Duplicate’.
5. If the duplicate is lost, stolen or destroyed, no further replacement shall be issued.
6. If the lost or stolen licence is retrieved, it shall not be used and must be returned to the licensing authority.
DOUBTS REGARDING THE VALIDITY OF THE LICENCE
Article 8
1. Where, in case of doubt regarding the validity of the licence or a replacement, the competent authorities have requested additional verification, the licensing authority shall confirm the granting of the licence in writing and provide the necessary information.
2. If it considers it necessary, the licensing authority may ask the competent authorities to send it a copy of the licence or the replacement in question.
3. If the licensing authority considers it necessary, it shall withdraw the licence and issue a corrected copy which will include the endorsement ‘Duplicate’ authenticated by stamp and forward it to the competent authorities.
4. If the validity of the licence is confirmed, the licensing authority shall notify the competent authorities of this, preferably electronically, and return the copies of the licence. The copies thus returned shall bear the endorsement ‘Validated on …’ validated/authenticated by stamp.
5. If the licence in question is not valid, the licensing authority shall notify the competent authorities of this, preferably electronically.
APPENDICES
1.
FLEGT licence format
2.
Notes for guidance
Appendix 2
NOTES FOR GUIDANCE
General details
|
— |
Complete in capital letters. |
|
— |
Where mentioned, ISO codes refer to the international standard two-letter country code. |
|
Box 1 |
Licensing authority |
Indicate the name and address of the licensing authority. |
|
Box 2 |
For the purposes of the issuing country |
Space for the purposes of the issuing country. |
|
Box 3 |
FLEGT licence number |
Indicate the issuing number. |
|
Box 4 |
Date of expiry |
Period of validity of the licence. |
|
Box 5 |
Country of export |
This is the partner country from which the timber products have been exported to the EU. |
|
Box 6 |
ISO code |
Indicate the two-letter code for the partner country referred to in box 5. |
|
Box 7 |
Means of transport |
Indicate the means of transport at the point of export. |
|
Box 8 |
Licensee |
Indicate the name and address of the exporter. |
|
Box 9 |
Commercial description |
Indicate the commercial description of the timber product(s). |
|
Box 10 |
HS heading and description |
Indicate the four- or six-figure product code produced in accordance with the harmonised system for the designation and codification of goods. |
|
Box 11 |
Common or scientific names |
Indicate the common or scientific names of the categories of timber used in the product. If more than one category of timber is used in a product, use a separate line for each category. Optional in the case of composite products or components that contain more than one unidentifiable category (e.g. particle boards). |
|
Box 12 |
Countries of harvest |
Indicate the countries where the categories of timber referred to in box 10 were harvested. If more than one category is used in the product, indicate all sources of timber used. Optional in the case of composite products or components that contain more than one unidentifiable category (e.g. particle boards). |
|
Box 13 |
ISO codes |
Indicate the ISO code of the countries referred to in box 12. Optional in the case of composite products or components that contain more than one unidentifiable category (e.g. particle boards). |
|
Box 14 |
Volume (m3) |
Give the overall volume in m3. Optional, unless the information referred to in box 15 has been omitted. |
|
Box 15 |
Net Weight |
Give the overall weight in kg. This is defined as the net mass of the timber products without immediate containers or any packaging, other than bearers, spacers, stickers, etc. Optional, unless the information referred to in box 14 has been omitted. |
|
Box 16 |
Number of units |
Indicate the number of units, where a manufactured product is best quantified in this way. Optional. |
|
Box 17 |
Distinguishing marks |
Indicate any distinguishing marks where appropriate, e.g. lot number, bill of lading number. Optional. |
|
Box 18 |
Signature and stamp of the licensing authority |
The box shall be signed by the authorised official and stamped with the official stamp of the licensing authority. The place and date shall also be indicated. |
ANNEX VI
TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE INDEPENDENT AUDIT OF THE FLEGT SYSTEM (SIA)
I. Tasks
The main tasks to be carried out in the independent audit, through documentary checks and on-site inspections, will be:
|
— |
to audit the legality verification system (LVS) and its operation by assessing use of the legality matrix and controls, the traceability system and the system for issuing licences, |
|
— |
to verify the use of licences during the process of entering the Union market, |
|
— |
to identify any loopholes or failures in the LVS and report findings to the Joint Agreement Implementation Committee of the Agreement (JIC), |
|
— |
to evaluate the effectiveness of any corrective measures taken to address failures identified in audit reports. |
II. Qualification required
The Independent Audit is assigned to an independent firm of auditors having proven ability in carrying out audits and providing evidence of a thorough knowledge of the forestry sector in Congo and/or the Congo Basin.
It must also have the following characteristics:
|
— |
not be directly involved in the management, processing or trade of timber or its derived products or the monitoring of forestry sector activities in Congo. Service providers under contract with the Congolese government with respect to forestry control are not eligible to carry out SIAs, |
|
— |
have an internal quality system in accordance with the ISO 17021 system or equivalent, |
|
— |
be able to demonstrate that its teams include experts in the fields of audits relating to forestry management, the processing industry, traceability systems, the exporting of timber and international markets – including the Union market, |
|
— |
be able to demonstrate that its teams include experts having sufficient experience in Congo and/or elsewhere in the Congo Basin. The involvement of experts from the subregion is to be encouraged alongside the use of international experts, |
|
— |
not be in an administrative or financial position that might put the firm of auditors or experts named in a position where there is a conflict of interests. |
III. Methodology
The Independent Audit is carried out according to documentary and on-site procedures:
|
— |
The Independent Auditor of the System acts in accordance with this Agreement and has a documented management structure, policies and a procedural manual drawn up in accordance with ISO standards 17021, 19011 or equivalent, which are made available for public inspection. The Auditor’s Procedural Manual and its annexes, which serve as a guide for documentary and on-site verification (based on samples), will be submitted to the JIC for approval. |
|
— |
The Independent Auditor of the System prepares a timetable of audit operations over the course of 3 years, based on a frequency to be decided in consultation with the JIC. In the first two years, the frequency must be three or more. In year three, the frequency may be reduced but must be accompanied by spot checks. The frequency and thoroughness of the checks to be carried out may be reviewed at meetings of the JIC responsible for examining audit reports, according to established findings. |
|
— |
The Independent Auditor of the System sets up a system for receiving and dealing with complaints made against it. The system of managing complaints is approved by the JIC, including the guiding principles of reports on complaints and action taken. This system has to ensure the secure receipt of complaints, guaranteeing the confidentiality of the party making it. |
|
— |
The Independent Auditor of the System provides an analysis of the systemic problems encountered on the basis of monitoring carried out. |
|
— |
The Independent Auditor of the System has a duty of confidentiality in respect of data gathered from various structures it has visited while carrying out its audit. |
|
— |
The audit report contains all useful information on the programme and the findings made. An outline of the audit report and summary is given in the Procedural Manual. |
|
— |
The Independent Auditor of the System reports its findings using the mechanism set up by the JIC. |
IV. Sources of information
To carry out its functions, the Independent Auditor of the System uses all sources of information available (inspection reports, annual reports, other documentation, interviews, computer databases, site visits, etc.) and, in particular, has access to documents and databases that it deems relevant to the following departments and to accredited bodies under the LVS and its constituent parts (verification of legality, verification of the traceability system, verification of the system for granting licences):
|
1. |
All departments of the Ministry of Forest Economy (DGEF, DVRF, IGEF, SCPFE, DDEF, teams and control stations, etc., in Congolese territory and, if applicable, in neighbouring countries) responsible for the permanent implementation of forestry control provisions carried out under the framework of the National Control Strategy (to be drawn up by the MEF before implementation of the VPA). |
|
2. |
Those involved in monitoring or checking forest exploitation:
|
|
3. |
Other ministry departments such as the Ministry of Trade, the Ministry for the Economy, Finances and Budget (Customs, Tax, etc.), the Ministry of Transport and the Ministry of Employment (ONEMO, CNSS). |
|
4. |
Bodies responsible for verifying legality and bodies responsible for the independent audit of the FLEGT system in neighbouring countries and their sources of information. |
|
5. |
Joint Implementation Committees for Voluntary Partnership Agreements between the Union and neighbouring countries. |
|
6. |
Other sources:
|
|
7. |
Competent authorities of the Union The independent auditor of the system can question staff involved in the legality verification system or accredited bodies in this audit and gather witness evidence it deems necessary to carry out the audit, without prejudice to the handling of complaints that may be brought to its attention regarding the implementation or operation of the legality verification system and/or its accredited bodies. The Parties will ensure that the independent auditor of the system has access in the respective territories of the two Parties to any information required in order to carry out its functions. |
V. Reports
The System Independent Audit report contains all relevant information on the audit programme and on the operation of the legality verification system and the issuing of FLEGT licences. The report includes in its annex all of the complaints received, the replies given and the action to be taken. This report will be published by the JIC.
The Independent Auditor of the System will submit a preliminary report to each of the two Parties within one month from the end of the on-site inspection. An oral presentation of the audit report to the JIC may be scheduled. Comments made by the Parties will be passed on to the Independent Auditor of the System for finalisation of the report by a deadline agreed between the independent auditor of the system and the JIC, but no longer than one month after receipt of the report. The Independent Auditor of the System has to provide any information required and any clarification requested by a deadline agreed between the independent auditor of the system and the JIC, but no longer than 15 days after receipt of the comments of the two Parties. The final report will be based on the preliminary report to which will be added any clarification provided by either party, and any responses by the SIA to this clarification.
The JIC will publish the final report.
On the basis of the audit report and on the basis of other evidence in its possession and, in particular, any criticisms or complaints regarding the operation of the legality verification system, the JIC identifies the corrective action to be taken, if any, and ensures that it is carried out.
The minutes of meetings of the JIC regarding the report of the Independent Auditor of the System will be published.
VI. Institutional arrangement
Those taking part in the JIC process select, via an appropriate and transparent call for tenders, the applicant best qualified to carry out the Independent Audit of the System. The selection process involves looking at the capabilities of the applicants in terms of carrying out audits, their capabilities in relation to the forestry sector in Congo or the Congo Basin and the international credibility of the applicant, particularly in terms of independence. The latter then signs with the government, which allows it to operate transparently and effectively, a three-year contract that may be extended, subject to approval by the JIC. If applicable, a new call for tenders will be launched.
The independent auditor must have or must set up an office (throughout the contractual period) in Brazzaville. This office must be open throughout the contractual period, serving as a point of contact for the parties involved and organising specific checks by auditors. It will be used by the auditors during the periods specified.
SIA reports and any corrective action required are discussed by the JIC. The SIA is then notified of the corrective action to be taken. If applicable, the procedural manual is amended.
ANNEX VII
CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING THE OPERATIONAL LEGALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM IN CONGO
The Partnership Agreement between the Union and Congo (FLEGT-VPA) provides for the development and implementation of a Legality Verification System (LVS) to ensure that all timber and derived products specified in the Agreement and exported from Congo to the Union have been legally produced. The LVS should include: a definition of legally produced timber that describes the laws that must be complied with in order for a licence to be issued; the monitoring of the supply chain to track timber from the forest to the point of export; the verification of compliance with all elements of the definition of legality and monitoring of the supply chain; the procedures for granting licences and the issuing of FLEGT licences; and finally, the independent audit to ensure that the system is working as intended.
The Union’s expectations with regard to the LVS are outlined in a series of briefing notes prepared by an expert group convened by the European Commission (EC) (1).
Assessment criteria
The LVS will be subject to an independent technical evaluation before the licensing scheme becomes fully operational, the Terms of Reference for which will be jointly agreed between the interested parties and the Joint Committee. These assessment criteria describe what the LVS is expected to produce and will provide the basis for the Terms of Reference for the evaluation. The evaluation will aim to:
|
(i) |
review the system description with special focus on any revisions made after the FLEGT-VPA was signed; and |
|
(ii) |
examine the functioning of the system in practice. |
Section 1: Definition of legality
Legally produced timber needs to be defined on the basis of the laws applicable in Congo. The definition used must be unambiguous, objectively verifiable and operationally workable and, as a minimum, include those laws which cover:
— harvesting rights: granting of legal rights to harvest the timber within legally gazetted boundaries,
— forest operations: compliance with legal requirements regarding forest management including compliance with relevant environmental and labour legislation,
— fees and taxes: compliance with legal requirements concerning taxes, royalties and fees directly related to timber harvesting and harvesting rights,
— other users: respect for other parties’ legal tenure or rights of use of land and resources that may be affected by timber harvesting rights, where such other rights exist,
— trade and customs: compliance with legal requirements for trade and customs procedures.
Is it clear what legal instrument underpins each element of the definition?
Are criteria and indicators that can be used to test compliance with each element of the definition specified?
Are the criteria/indicators clear, objective and operationally workable?
Do the indicators and criteria clearly identify the roles and responsibilities of the various parties and does verification assess performance of all relevant parties?
Does the definition of legality include the main areas of existing law outlined above? If not: why were certain areas of law left out of the definition?
In developing the definition, did the parties concerned consider all the main areas of applicable law?
Does the legality verification system incorporate the main legal provisions identified through prior discussion between the various parties involved?
Has the definition of legality and the legality control matrix been amended since the FLEGT-VPA was concluded? Have indicators and criteria been defined to ensure verification of these changes?
Section 2: Control of the supply chain
Systems to control the supply chain must provide credible assurance that timber products can be traced throughout the supply chain from harvesting or point of import to the point of export. It will not always be necessary to maintain physical traceability for a log, log load or timber product from the point of export back to the forest of origin, but it is always needed between the forest and the first point of mixing (e.g. a timber terminal or a processing facility).
2.1. Rights of use
There is clear delineation of areas where forest resource rights have been allocated and the holders of those rights have been identified.
Does the control system ensure that only timber originating from a forest area with valid and permissible rights of use enters the supply chain?
Does the control system ensure that enterprises carrying out harvesting operations have been issued appropriate rights of use for the forest areas concerned?
Are the procedures for issuing rights of exploitation and information on issued rights of exploitation and their holders available in the public domain?
2.2. Systems for controlling the supply chain
There are effective mechanisms for tracing timber throughout the supply chain from harvesting to the point of export.
The approach for identifying timber may vary, ranging from the use of labels for individual items to reliance on documentation accompanying a load or batch. The selected method should reflect the type and value of timber and the risk of contamination with illegal or unverified timber.
Are all the supply chain alternatives identified and described in the control system?
Are all stages in the supply chain identified and described in the control system?
Are methods defined and documented to (a) identify the product origin and (b) prevent mixing with timber from unknown sources in the following stages of the supply chain?
|
— |
timber in the forest, |
|
— |
transport, |
|
— |
interim storage, |
|
— |
arrival at the primary processing facility, |
|
— |
processing facility, |
|
— |
interim storage, |
|
— |
transport, |
|
— |
arrival at point of export. |
Which organisations are in charge of controlling the timber flows? Do they have adequate human and other resources for carrying out the control activities?
2.3. Quantities
There are robust and effective mechanisms for measuring and recording the quantities of timber or timber products at each stage of the supply chain, including reliable and accurate pre-harvest estimates of the volume of standing timber in each harvesting site.
Does the control system produce quantitative data of inputs and outputs at the following stages of the supply chain?
|
— |
standing timber, |
|
— |
logs in the forest, |
|
— |
transported and stored timber, |
|
— |
arrival at the plant, |
|
— |
entry into production lines/processing facilities, |
|
— |
exit from production lines/processing facilities, |
|
— |
exit from plant, |
|
— |
arrival at point of export. |
Which organisations are responsible for feeding the quantitative data into the control system? What is the quality of controlled data?
Is all quantitative data recorded in a way which makes it possible to verify quantities with the prior and subsequent stages in the supply chain in good time?
What information on the supply chain control is made publicly available? How can the interested parties access this information?
2.4. Mixing of legally verified timber with timber approved elsewhere
If mixing of logs or timber from verified legal sources with logs or timber from other sources is allowed, there are sufficient controls in place to exclude timber from unknown sources or which was harvested without legal harvesting rights.
Does the control system allow verified timber to be mixed with other approved timber (e.g. with imported timber or timber originating from a forest area with clear legal harvesting rights but that is still not covered by the full verification process)?
What control measures are applied in these cases? For example, do controls ensure that verified output volumes declared do not exceed total verified input volumes at each stage?
2.5. Imported timber products
There are adequate controls to ensure that imported timber and derived products have been legally imported.
How is the legal import of timber and derived products demonstrated?
What evidence is required to demonstrate that imported products originate from trees harvested legally in a third country?
Does the LVS identify imported timber and timber products throughout the supply chain?
Where imported timber is used, can the country of origin be identified on the FLEGT licence, including that of components in composite products?
Section 3: Verification
Verification provides adequate checks to ensure the legality of timber. It must be sufficiently robust and effective to ensure that any non-compliance with requirements, either in the forest or within the supply chain, is identified and corrective action is taken in good time.
3.1. Organisation
Verification is carried out by a government, a third-party organisation or some combination of these, which has adequate resources, management systems and skilled and trained personnel, as well as robust and effective mechanisms to control conflicts of interest.
Has the government appointed a body or bodies to undertake the verification tasks? Is the mandate (and associated responsibilities) clear and in the public domain?
Does the verification body have adequate resources for carrying out the verification of the legality definition and the systems for controlling the timber supply chain?
Does the verification body have a fully documented management system that:
|
— |
ensures that its personnel has the necessary competence and experience to ensure effective verification? |
|
— |
applies internal control/supervision? |
|
— |
includes mechanisms to control conflicts of interest? |
|
— |
ensures transparency of the system? |
|
— |
defines and applies verification methodology? |
3.2. Verification against the definition of legality
There is a clear definition setting out what has to be verified. The verification methodology is documented and ensures that the process is systematic, transparent, evidence-based, carried out at regular intervals and covers everything included within the definition.
Does the verification methodology cover all elements of the legality definition and include tests of compliance with all specified indicators?
Does verification require:
|
— |
checks of documentation, operating records and on-site operations (including spot checks)? |
|
— |
collection of information from external interested parties? |
|
— |
recording of verification activities that allows checking by internal auditors and the independent monitor? |
Are institutional roles and responsibilities clearly defined and applied?
Are the verification results against the definition of legality made publicly available?
How can the interested parties access this information?
3.3. Verification of systems for controlling the supply chain
There is a clear scope setting out what has to be verified which covers the entire supply chain from harvesting to export. The verification methodology is documented and ensures that the process is systematic, transparent, evidence-based, carried out at regular intervals and covers everything included within the scope, and includes regular and timely reconciliation of data between each stage in the chain.
Are institutional roles and responsibilities clearly defined and applied?
Does the verification methodology fully cover checks on supply chain controls? Is this clearly spelt out in verification methodology?
What evidence is there to demonstrate application of verification of supply chain controls?
Verification of data
|
— |
Which organisation is responsible for data verification? Does it have adequate human and other resources for carrying out the data management activities? |
|
— |
Are there methods for assessing correspondence between standing timber and timber entering the plant/point of export? |
|
— |
Are there methods to assess coherence between inputs of raw materials and outputs of processed products at sawmills and other plants? |
|
— |
Is reliable verification by individual item or by batch of timber products possible throughout the supply chain? |
|
— |
What information systems and technologies are applied for storing and verifying data and for recording it? Are there robust systems in place for securing the data? |
Are the verification results on supply chain control made publicly available? How can the interested parties access this information?
3.4. Non-compliance
There is an effective and functioning mechanism for requiring and enforcing appropriate corrective action where breaches are identified.
Does the verification system define the above requirement?
Have mechanisms been developed for handling non-compliance? Are these applied in practice?
Are there adequate records available on the breaches identified and corrective action taken? Is the effectiveness of corrective actions evaluated?
What information on identified breaches goes into the public domain?
Section 4: Licensing
Congo has assigned a licensing authority overall responsibility for issuing FLEGT licences. FLEGT licences are issued on the basis of either individual shipments or market participants.
4.1. Organisation
What body is assigned responsibility for issuing FLEGT licences?
Are the roles of the licensing authority and its personnel with regard to issuing of FLEGT licences clearly defined and publicly available?
Are the competence requirements defined and internal controls established for the personnel of the licensing authority?
Does the licensing authority have adequate resources for carrying out its task?
4.2. Issuing of licences
Does the licensing authority have documented procedures for issuing licences? Are these publicly available, including any fees payable?
What evidence is there that these procedures are properly applied in practice?
Are there adequate records available on licences issued and refused? Do the records clearly show the evidence on which the issuing of licences is based?
4.3. Consignment-based licences
Is the licensing based on an individual consignment?
Has the legality of an export consignment been demonstrated through government verification and traceability systems?
Have the requirements for issuing licences been clearly defined and communicated to the exporter and to the other parties concerned?
What information on issued licences goes into the public domain?
Section 5: Instructions on the independent auditing of the system
The System Independent Audit (SIA) is a function that is independent of Congo’s forest sector regulatory bodies. It aims to maintain the credibility of the FLEGT licensing scheme by checking that all aspects of Congo’s LVS are operating as intended.
5.1. Institutional arrangements
5.1.1. Designation of authority
Congo has formally authorised the SIA function and allows it to operate in an effective and transparent way.
5.1.2. Independence from other elements of the LVS
There is a clear separation between the organisations and individuals that are involved in management or regulation of forest resources and those involved in the independent audit.
Does the government have documented requirements for the independence of the independent auditor? Do provisions state that organisations or individuals having a commercial interest or an institutional role in the Congolese forest sector are not eligible to perform the independent auditor function?
5.1.3. Designation of the independent auditor
The independent auditor was appointed through a transparent mechanism and there are clear and publicly available rules regarding its operations.
Has the government made the terms of reference for the independent auditor publicly available?
Has the government documented the procedures for appointing the independent auditor and made them publicly available?
5.1.4. Establishing a mechanism for handling complaints
There is a mechanism for handling complaints and disputes that arise from the independent audit. This mechanism makes it possible to deal with any complaint relating to the operation of the licensing scheme.
Is there a documented for handling complaints mechanism that is available to all interested parties?
Is it clear how complaints are received, documented, escalated (where necessary) and responded to?
5.2. The independent auditor
5.2.1. Organisational and technical requirements
The independent auditor is independent of the other components of the legality assurance system and operates in accordance with a documented management structure, policies and procedures that meet internationally accepted best practice.
Does the independent auditor operate in accordance with a documented management system that meets the requirements of ISO Guides 62 and 65 or similar standards?
5.2.2. Methodology of the audit
The methodology of the independent audit is evidence-based and is carried out at specific and frequent intervals.
Does the methodology specify basing all findings on objective evidence concerning the functioning of the LVS?
Does the methodology of the independent audit specify the maximum intervals at which each element of the LVS will be verified?
5.2.3. Scope of the audit
The independent auditor operates according to terms of reference that clearly specify what has to be audited and that cover all agreed requirements for the issuing of FLEGT licences.
Does the methodology of the independent audit cover all elements of the LVS and specify the main tests of effectiveness?
5.2.4. Reporting requirements
The independent auditor provides the Joint Committee with regular reports on the integrity of the legality assurance system, including any non-compliance, as well as its assessment of corrective action taken to address it.
Do the independent auditor’s terms of reference specify the reporting requirements and reporting intervals?
(1) http://ec.europa.eu/development/policies/9interventionareas/environment/forest/flegt_briefing_notes_en.cfm
ANNEX VIII
|
Action Period |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
||||||||
|
1 |
Signing of the Agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Setting up the joint mechanism for dialogue and monitoring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Launch of the ratification procedure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
Installation and fitting of the Technical Office for the Congolese party |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Search for additional financing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
Development of the Legality Verification System and defining all specific measures necessary (cf. Annex V) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
Recruitment of the traceability consultant (EU traceability project) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
Implementation of the traceability project (EU project) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
Legislation and regulations to be supplemented |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
Defining the specific powers of the various verification and control bodies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
Increasing the capabilities of the General Forest Economy Inspectorate (IGEF) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
Increasing the capabilities of the DGEF/DDEF/Teams |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
Increasing the capabilities of civil society |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
Implementation of the communication plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
Evaluating private certification systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
Drawing up the procedural manual for breaches of legality and penalties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
Drawing up and approving management plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
Putting FLEGT information on the website |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
Ratification of the Agreement (for the record) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
Installation of the Joint Implementation Committee of the Agreement (for the record) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
Recruitment of the System Independent Auditor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
First inspection of the IGEF to draw up legality certificates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
Operational assessment of the Legality Verification System |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
Declaration of the operationality of FLEGT licences by the two parties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
Issuing of the first FLEGT licence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Action Period |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
||||||||
|
1 |
Routine functioning of the legality verification system |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Monitoring of implementation of the legality verification system |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Functioning of the Technical Office |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
Functioning of the Joint Committee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Independent audits of the system |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
Monitoring of the market |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
Monitoring of impacts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
Management of the website and distribution of information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
Assessment of the implementation of the agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANNEX IX
OTHER RELEVANT MEASURES
Supporting measures have to be put in place to ensure effective implementation of the Voluntary Partnership Agreement. The areas in which these supporting measures are identified are as follows:
|
1. |
Increasing the capabilities of the IGEF |
|
2. |
Increasing the capabilities of civil society |
|
3. |
Legislation and regulations to be supplemented |
|
4. |
Implementing a communication plan |
|
5. |
Setting up a technical office |
These measures are described in the following chapters.
In order to implement these measures, in the same way as for the implementation of certain parts of the legality verification system, the Parties have to ensure that adequate support is provided in terms of human, technical and financial resources. The Parties undertake, where applicable, to seek the additional financing necessary, this financing being used in accordance with Article 15 of this Agreement.
1. Increasing the capabilities of the General Forest Economy Inspectorate (IGEF)
When verifying the legality of timber, the General Inspectorate has to carry out on-site inspections and monitor the verifiers in the legality matrices and the traceability chain at forestry companies and in departmental forest economy offices, teams and other local public departments involved in forest management, including: environment, customs, tax, labour, trade, etc.
Once it has carried out this verification, it will grant legality certificates and order the granting of FLEGT licences by the Department for the Control of Forestry Products for Export (SCPFE).
The IGEF also has to be restructured to enable it to carry out these tasks effectively.
To do this, a unit responsible for verifying legality, issuing legality certificates and instructing the granting of FLEGT licences will be set up within this structure and will have to be given greater capabilities to enable it to carry out these tasks. The number of people working in this unit will be defined during the system development phase.
Job profiles will be drawn up and further training identified during the system development phase. Training is to be planned for in the following areas: Control of the FLEGT matrix, auditing of forest management and the supply chain, use of GPS, use of certain GIS software, principles of database management and use of the SIGEF.
The equipment required is also to be planned for (means of transport, office and site equipment).
By extension, and to the extent necessary to ensure the proper functioning of the Agreement, training specific to other administrative officers involved in monitoring and verifying legality can be identified and carried out.
2. Increasing the capabilities of civil society
Implementing the VPA is subject, inter alia, to the proper functioning of a legality verification system, timber traceability and an independent audit of the system. Congolese civil society, a stakeholder in the process, is to help implement the Agreement by means of a formal local structure based on the results of and experience gained in the Independent Forest Monitoring (IFM) project carried out in Congo between 2007 and 2009 by Resources Extraction Monitoring and Forest Monitor.
This structure consists of one or more national NGOs accompanied by an international NGO experienced in independent monitoring. These national NGOs will also use the expertise of members of equivalent teams from the IFM project.
The formal local structure sets itself the general objective of assisting good governance of the forest sector as a whole. Its specific objectives are as follows:
|
— |
to improve systems for the application of forestry law by the State, |
|
— |
to increase the capabilities of civil society by means of independent monitoring, |
|
— |
to help improve the application of forestry law and governance, |
|
— |
to document information collected and pass it on to the authority granting certificates and FLEGT licences, |
|
— |
to document information collected and pass it on to the Joint Implementation Committee. |
In addition to this formal structure associated with independent monitoring, a more general increasing of the capabilities of civil society organisations is to be planned for.
In this context, the capabilities of civil society will be increased in the following areas:
training in independent monitoring, control of the FLEGT matrix, information management and processing, website management, communication techniques, raising awareness among local communities and indigenous populations, conflict resolution techniques and principles of forest management.
Detailed practical terms will be defined after consultation between the stakeholders.
The Parties will try to facilitate access to specific financial resources in order to increase these capabilities.
3. Legislation and regulations to be supplemented
Drawing up timber legality matrices has brought to light the omission under forestry law and the lack or regulation of certain aspects directly and indirectly associated with the sustainable management of forest resources, such as, for example, the involvement of local and indigenous populations and of civil society in forest management, the management of State forestry plantations and the defining of standards for forestry work. In the context of implementing the Voluntary Partnership Agreement, the forestry code needs to be updated and supplementary regulations need to be drawn up. Rules also have to be drawn up in other areas.
An international consultant and two national consultants will be recruited to carry out these tasks.
Draft regulations drawn up will be approved by all stakeholders in forest management (local authorities, publics services, private sector, local and indigenous populations, civil society), through departmental workshops and a national workshop in Brazzaville.
The list of draft regulations to be drawn up, as presented below, is not exhaustive and will be supplemented as new concerns are identified.
3.1. Ministerial departments concerned
Ministry for the Environment
|
1. |
Order specifying terms for the production and approval of impact studies. |
|
2. |
Order relating to procedures for monitoring/inspection by the General Environmental Office of compliance with legal and regulatory provisions relating to the environment. |
Ministry of Justice
|
1. |
Law promoting and protecting the rights of indigenous peoples in Congo. |
Ministry of Employment
|
1. |
Regulations relating to the granting of training certification. |
|
2. |
Model pay registers. |
|
3. |
Model workplace accident and safety registers. |
Ministry for the Forest Economy
|
1. |
Regulations laying down conditions for the assignment of State plantations to third parties. |
|
2. |
Order defining principles for the traceability of timber. |
|
3. |
Order defining forestry standards for plantations. |
|
4. |
Framework decree laying down conditions for joint and participative forest management as set out in Article 1(2) of the forestry code and covering in particular:
|
|
5. |
Decree laying down the terms of involvement of local communities, indigenous populations and civil society in making decisions relating to the drafting of terms and conditions. |
|
6. |
Implementing regulations specifying three different aspects of community forests: the concept of community forests, the processes of parcelling and procedures for the management of these forests guaranteeing the involvement of all parties concerned. |
|
7. |
Implementing regulations laying down terms for the involvement of local communities and indigenous populations in the management plan (parcelling of community blocks etc.). |
|
8. |
Implementing regulations laying down terms for the involvement of civil society and/or the appointment of civil society representatives to various committees (granting of forest concessions, granting of consent for the timber forest profession, etc.). These regulations will also lay down criteria for the selection of this civil society representative. |
|
9. |
Regulations laying down terms for monitoring and verification. |
|
10. |
Order relating to procedures for the monitoring of timber for import and for export and timber in transit. |
|
11. |
Regulations laying down terms for the receipt of goods or services making it possible to prove compliance with terms and conditions and memoranda of understanding. |
|
12. |
Other regulations to be supplemented to implement the Forestry Code according to FLEGT principles of good governance in the forestry sector. |
For this purpose, and to meet the commitments made under the FLEGT Voluntary Partnership Agreement between Congo and the Union, proposed implementing regulations should guarantee principles of good governance in the forestry sector.
Principles that should form part of supplementary regulations
To ensure that they are effective and comply with the legality matrix and FLEGT principles, regulations supplementing the forestry code need to be in force by the time of the issuing of the first licence at the latest.
Recognition of community rights
Participation
The participation and involvement of civil society, local communities and indigenous populations in the drafting, implementation and monitoring of laws and programmes. Implementing regulations laying down terms of involvement of local communities, indigenous populations and civil society have to be drawn up.
Transparency
Provisions should be included to ensure transparency in forest management and place information in the public domain. Terms for the provision of information to and consultation of local communities and indigenous populations have to form part of these provisions.
Community forests
The concept does not exist in the wording of law 16-2000 of 20/11/2000 laying down the Forestry Code.
This concept can be taken into account in two possible ways: 1) forests of community blocks in the management plan or 2) forests of local authorities.
Independent monitoring
Provisions for the creation of an independent monitor from civil society to participate in the granting of exploitation permits and in drawing up and implementing management plans and to sit on the forestry fund management committee. Monitors should be recruited through a competitive, transparent process.
3.2. Methodology
The proposal of new legislation and regulations is the culmination of a general process of consultation of all parties concerned.
Consultation of communities and civil society
To ensure the effective involvement of local communities and indigenous populations in drawing up regulations supplementing the forestry code, local community and indigenous population organisations and civil society organisations need to organise and develop a process for effective participation and representation.
Creation of a committee to draft proposals
To ensure participation of all of the parties concerned in drafting regulations supplementing the forestry code, it is proposed that a committee be created to draw up draft regulations consisting of representatives of each party concerned. The drafting of these implementing regulations should be accompanied by consultation of communities and civil society on current discussions. This consultation should take place over a period of at least 12 months.
The consultation and participation of local communities, indigenous populations and civil society in the process should be supported by funding and facilitated by a committee of experts including members of national and subregional civil society organisations.
Consultation steps that should form part of the consultation support plan
Workshops for the provision of information to and consultation of local and indigenous communities on the drafting of regulations supplementing the code and canvassing opinion on the arrangements that have to be made to benefit them;
Workshops to define terms of participation and representation of communities and civil society on the committee drawing up regulations supplementing the forestry code;
Drawing up preliminary drafts of regulations supplementing the forestry code, with the participation of representatives of civil society and local and indigenous communities;
Workshops for consultation of local and indigenous communities on the preliminary draft of the forestry code;
Re-examination of the preliminary draft by the committee drawing up regulations supplementing the forestry code to include any questions raised by the communities and civil society;
Workshops for assessment of the provisions contained in the preliminary draft of the legislation and for defining strategies for defending it before Parliament.
4. Communication plan
This communication plan is intended to raise awareness of the Voluntary Partnership Agreement (VPA).
Background
The VPA relates to an economic area as important as forestry, so the public needs to be told about it. A programme for the provision of information to and raising of awareness among forestry company managers, departmental offices of target authorities and the general public therefore has to be drawn up and implemented.
A communication plan has been developed with the following aims:
|
— |
raising awareness among the general public of Congo regarding:
|
|
— |
preparing for ratification of the VPA by Congo, |
|
— |
identifying further information requirements, |
|
— |
ensuring collaboration between the stakeholders once the VPA has come into force and is being implemented. |
In strategic terms, it will consist of:
|
— |
informing the various players and parties operating in the forestry sector about the need and importance of the VPA for Congo, |
|
— |
informing the general public of the steps already taken to conclude the VPA, |
|
— |
ensuring media coverage of the ratification and implementation of the VPA, |
|
— |
raising awareness of the VPA, |
|
— |
giving details of the impacts of the VPA. |
4.1. Target public
The following target public has been identified. Specific messages will be prepared for them and appropriate means of communication will be used.
4.1.1. Local players:
|
— |
governmental bodies, |
|
— |
forestry authority, |
|
— |
other offices involved in the sector, |
|
— |
local authorities, |
|
— |
local and indigenous populations of forest areas, |
|
— |
forestry companies, |
|
— |
civil society, |
|
— |
NGOs for the preservation and protection of forests. |
4.1.2. International players:
|
— |
importers and intermediaries, |
|
— |
federations and other institutions involved in the timber sector, |
|
— |
NGOs for the preservation and protection of forests, |
|
— |
investors, |
|
— |
bankers etc. |
4.2. Action to be taken
The following action is to be taken for communication to these players:
|
4.2.1. |
At local level Organisation of:
|
|
4.2.2. |
At international level
|
4.3. Message content
Messages to be devised and disseminated will cover in particular:
|
— |
the social and socio-cultural benefits of an effective VPA for Congo, |
|
— |
the environmental benefits of an effective VPA for Congo’s forests, |
|
— |
the commercial benefits of an effective VPA for Congo’s economy, |
|
— |
the aims Congo seeks to achieve through the effective VPA, |
|
— |
the economic benefits to Congo, |
|
— |
other possible impacts of the VPA on Congo. |
4.4. Those responsible for implementing the plan
The Technical Office for the VPA/FLEGT of the Congolese party, which reports to the Ministry of the Forest Economy, is, amongst other things, responsible for implementing the Communication Plan:
|
— |
a team consisting of the various players initiates action with respect to public authorities, parliament and forestry companies, |
|
— |
civil society organisations carry out action with respect to local and indigenous populations. |
5. Technical office responsible for monitoring the VPA (Congolese party)
The Congolese party sets up, for its part, a supporting body to monitor the VPA, consisting of all of the stakeholders in the FLEGT process (public authorities, private sector and civil society), in order to assist in the preparation of the Congolese party on the Joint Implementation Committee and facilitate the monitoring of decisions taken by this committee. This body is called the technical office.
5.1. Tasks
The technical office will be responsible, in particular, for the Congolese party, for:
|
— |
monitoring compliance with the timetable for implementation of the VPA, |
|
— |
analysing reports drawn up by the independent auditor, |
|
— |
preparing Congolese documents for the Joint Implementation Committee, |
|
— |
preparing for sessions (meetings) of the Joint Implementation Committee and the National Consultative Group, |
|
— |
monitoring proper verification of legality by the General Forest Economy Inspectorate and other bodies involved, |
|
— |
assessing/evaluating requirements for the effective functioning of Congolese stakeholders, |
|
— |
monitoring implementation of the communication plan, |
|
— |
examining and adopting draft regulations supplementing laws and orders referred to in assessing legality, |
|
— |
suggesting any measure that may facilitate the entry into force and implementation of the VPA, |
|
— |
monitoring the drafting of periodic reports on the timber market, |
|
— |
monitoring the implementation of measures increasing the capabilities of the private sector and civil society, |
|
— |
suggesting suitable measures to overcome any difficulties associated with implementation of the VPA identified by the joint committee, |
|
— |
monitoring the drafting of periodic reports on the situation in the timber market. |
5.2. Composition of the technical office
The technical office includes:
|
— |
a president, |
|
— |
a vice-president, |
|
— |
a rapporteur, |
|
— |
a deputy rapporteur, |
|
— |
members: representatives of public authorities, the private sector and civil society. |
ANNEX X
PUBLISHED INFORMATION
1. Introduction
In order to implement the Voluntary Partnership Agreement (VPA), amongst other things, information has to be available on the VPA and its objectives, implementation, monitoring and control. This information has to be published by the Joint Implementation Committee of the VPA and by each of the Parties, this being in order to guarantee a clear understanding of the FLEGT licensing scheme by all those involved and effective governance with respect to forestry management.
2. Relevant information published by the forestry authority and other parties
The following information will be published:
|
|
Legal information:
|
|
|
Information on the annual forestry production of Congo:
|
|
|
Information on the process of granting certificates and the holders of permits:
|
|
|
Information on forest management:
|
|
|
Information on processing:
|
|
|
Information on the monitoring of legality:
|
|
|
Information on forestry revenue:
|
|
|
Information on trade with the Union:
|
|
|
The following information is published by the Union:
|
Information on the prices of timber and derived products charged in the Union market will be regularly supplied to the Congolese party.
3. Information that will be published by the Joint Committee
3.1. Minutes of meetings of the Joint Committee and summaries of decisions
3.2. A joint report containing the following information in particular:
|
(a) |
the measures taken by both Parties to prevent importation of timber and derived products of illegal origin in order to maintain the integrity of the FLEGT licensing scheme; |
|
(b) |
cases of non-compliance with the FLEGT licensing scheme in Congo and action taken in such cases; |
|
(c) |
number of cases and quantities of timber and derived products involved where Article 9(1) (1) has been applied; |
|
(d) |
action preventing the exportation of timber and derived products of illegal origin to non-EU markets or sale thereof on the national market; |
|
(e) |
progress made in achieving the objectives and carrying out the activities of the VPA within a deadline specified and all matters relating to implementation of the VPA; |
|
(f) |
Structure and functioning of the Joint Committee; |
|
(g) |
And certain details published by either party and mentioned under 2 in this annex (2). |
3.3. Terms of reference, inspection and audit reports by the independent auditor
4. Means of accessing information
The information mentioned above will be available:
|
— |
on the MEF website, |
|
— |
at the technical office of the Congolese party responsible for monitoring the VPA, |
|
— |
in annual reports drawn up by the Forestry Authority, available at the ministry and departmental offices, |
|
— |
in the national and international written press. |
Under the communication plan, public information meetings will also be held and will be an opportunity to pass this information on to participants, particularly to those on the ground and communities that do not have Internet access.
(1) Article 9(1) Link with the body of the text (refers to cases where timber has arrived at a Union customs office without a licence).
(2) These details are identified by an asterisk *.
ANNEX XI
FUNCTIONS OF THE JOINT AGREEMENT IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE
The Joint Agreement Implementation Committee is responsible for managing the Voluntary Partnership Agreement (VPA) and monitoring and assessing its implementation.
Its responsibilities include the following in particular:
|
(a) |
in relation to management of the VPA,
|
|
(b) |
in relation to the monitoring and assessment of the VPA,
|
|
(c) |
in relation to the independent audit,
|
|
(d) |
in relation to the involvement of other players in management of the VPA,
|