This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62023TB0421
Case T-421/23: Order of the General Court of 16 May 2024 – Versobank v ECB (Action for damages – Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Manifest inadmissibility)
Case T-421/23: Order of the General Court of 16 May 2024 – Versobank v ECB (Action for damages – Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Manifest inadmissibility)
Case T-421/23: Order of the General Court of 16 May 2024 – Versobank v ECB (Action for damages – Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Manifest inadmissibility)
OJ C, C/2024/3917, 1.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3917/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
Official Journal |
EN C series |
|
C/2024/3917 |
1.7.2024 |
Order of the General Court of 16 May 2024 – Versobank v ECB
(Case T-421/23) (1)
(Action for damages - Non-contractual liability - Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB - Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation - Failure to comply with procedural requirements - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2024/3917)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Versobank AS (Tallinn, Estonia) (represented by: O. Behrends, lawyer)
Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: E. Yoo, A. Pizzolla and G. Marafioti, acting as Agents)
Re:
By its action under Article 268 TFEU, the applicant seeks compensation for the damage it claims to have suffered as a result of, first, the adoption of Decision ECB-SSM-2018-EE2 WHD-2017-0012 of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 17 July 2018 withdrawing its authorisation as a credit institution and, secondly, the ECB’s conduct in connection with that decision.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
|
2. |
There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application to intervene submitted by the Council of the European Union. |
|
3. |
Versobank AS shall pay the costs, except those relating to the application to intervene. |
|
4. |
The Council shall bear its own costs. |
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3917/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)