Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62023CN0659

    Case C-659/23 P: Appeal brought on 8 November 2023 by LD against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 29 August 2023 in Case T-633/22, LD v EUIPO

    OJ C, C/2024/4303, 15.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4303/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4303/oj

    European flag

    Official Journal
    of the European Union

    EN

    C series

    C/2024/4303

    15.7.2024

    Appeal brought on 8 November 2023 by LD against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 29 August 2023 in Case T-633/22, LD v EUIPO

    (Case C-659/23 P)

    (C/2024/4303)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Appellant: LD (represented by: H. Tettenborn, Rechtsanwalt)

    Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office

    By order of 4 June 2024, the Court of Justice (Ninth Chamber) dismissed the appeal as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded. Further, the Court held that LD should bear her own costs.

    ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4303/oj

    ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

    Top